Regional Corruption, Foreign Trade, and Environmental Pollution

As an effective means and an important guarantee for environmental pollution management in China, enhancing the level of foreign openness and reducing the level of regional corruption, respectively, the successful implementation of both are key steps in determining the future development of China’s transformation of trade development and green transformation. This paper attempts to systematically examine the mechanisms of regional corruption and foreign trade on environmental pollution from both theoretical and empirical levels. Using the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2004 to 2017, this study constructs a dynamic panel model with a one-stage pollution index. The system GMM is used to verify the relationship between corruption, trade, and the environment. Empirical results show that corruption reduces investment in environmental governance, R&D, and the introduction of environmental technology, and it increases environmental pollution by reducing the implementation and control of environmental policies. After excluding the effect of corruption on trade, foreign trade is conducive to the improvement of environmental pollution. Meanwhile, the intensification of corruption on pollution will be weakened with increased openness; that is, China’s expansion of foreign trade is beneficial to attenuating the pollution effect of corruption on the environment. These findings suggest that expanding trade will ultimately improve the environment and even mitigate the negative impact of corruption on the environment. Therefore, China should dredge the channel of factor flow, give full play to the vitality of market players, strictly investigate corruption, and encourage opening up.

[1]  M. Kartal,et al.  Asymmetric and long-run impact of political stability on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in Finland: Evidence from nonlinear and Fourier-based approaches. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  Jianzheng Liu,et al.  Air pollution-induced health impacts and health economic losses in China driven by US demand exports. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Examining the Interaction Effect of Control of Corruption and Income Level on Environmental Quality in Africa , 2022, Sustainability.

[4]  Hongyan Zhang,et al.  Trade openness, economic growth, and energy intensity in China , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[5]  N. Mahmood,et al.  The corruption-emissions nexus: Do information and communication technologies make a difference? , 2021 .

[6]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Role of political risk to achieve carbon neutrality: Evidence from Brazil. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  K. Ajide,et al.  Nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption, trade openness, and environmental quality in G-7 countries: the conditional role of technological progress , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[8]  Shuwei Jia Effect of combined strategy on mitigating air pollution in China , 2021, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[9]  Yuanhua Yang,et al.  The dynamic relationship between regional corruption and carbon emissions in China , 2020, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[10]  Rakesh Kumar,et al.  Review of scientific technology-based solutions for vehicular pollution control , 2020, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[11]  M. Song,et al.  Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Shu-Chen Chang,et al.  Same Trade Openness Yet Different Environmental Quality — But Why? , 2020 .

[13]  Kerui Du,et al.  How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data , 2020, Energy Policy.

[14]  Xuan Chen,et al.  Effect of marine environmental regulation on the industrial structure adjustment of manufacturing industry: An empirical analysis of China's eleven coastal provinces , 2020 .

[15]  Yingzhi Xu,et al.  Trade liberalization and haze pollution: Evidence from China , 2020 .

[16]  E. Osabuohien,et al.  Environmental pollution, economic growth and institutional quality: exploring the nexus in Nigeria , 2020, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.

[17]  V. Trofimchuk Manus manum lavat: can corruption be considered a state-imposed trade barrier? , 2020 .

[18]  Shuhong Wang,et al.  Government corruption, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency , 2020 .

[19]  S. Narayan,et al.  Does Corruption in Exporter and Importer Country Influence International Trade? , 2019, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade.

[20]  Ayesha Ameer,et al.  Nonlinear effect of FDI, economic growth, and industrialization on environmental quality , 2019 .

[21]  S. Gil‐Pareja,et al.  Corruption and international trade: a comprehensive analysis with gravity , 2019, Applied Economic Analysis.

[22]  Wisdom Akpalu,et al.  Trade-induced environmental quality: the role of factor endowment and environmental regulation in Africa , 2019, Climate and Development.

[23]  Per G. Fredriksson,et al.  Corruption and environmental regulatory policy in the United States: Does trust matter? , 2018, Resource and Energy Economics.

[24]  Xuping Cao,et al.  Dynamic Change in the Export Technology Structure of China’s Environmental Goods and Its International Comparison , 2018, Sustainability.

[25]  C. Tang,et al.  The double-edge resource-based view of logistics performance and governance in Asian countries , 2018, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.

[26]  Ryan Abman Rule of Law and Avoided Deforestation from Protected Areas , 2018 .

[27]  Giray Gozgor Does trade matter for carbon emissions in OECD countries? Evidence from a new trade openness measure , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[28]  Eyup Dogan,et al.  Does corruption matter for the environment? Panel evidence from China , 2017 .

[29]  Carlo Migliardo,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Impact of Corruption on Environmental Performance: Evidence from Panel Data , 2017 .

[30]  Suxia Liu,et al.  The impact of industrial agglomeration on industrial pollutant emission: evidence from China under New Normal , 2017, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[31]  Meenakshi Rishi,et al.  Determinants of CO2 emission for post-Soviet Union independent countries , 2017 .

[32]  Abdul Qayyum Khan,et al.  Growth-corruption-health triaca and environmental degradation: empirical evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[33]  M. Brauer,et al.  Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and international trade , 2017, Nature.

[34]  Š. Bojnec,et al.  EFFECTS OF GLOBALIZATION AND CORRUPTION ON THE OUTWARD FDI IN OECD COUNTRIES , 2017 .

[35]  S. Mukherjee,et al.  Is environmental sustainability influenced by socioeconomic and sociopolitical factors? cross‐country empirical evidence , 2013 .

[36]  Sotirios K. Bellos,et al.  Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment: A Panel Gravity Model Approach , 2012 .

[37]  Shu Tao,et al.  Sulfur dioxide emissions from combustion in china: from 1990 to 2007. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Eelke de Jong,et al.  Does corruption discourage international trade , 2011 .

[39]  A. Blackman,et al.  Clean technological change in developing-country industrial clusters: Mexican leather tanning , 2010 .

[40]  M. Cole Corruption, income and the environment: An empirical analysis , 2007 .

[41]  R. Elliott,et al.  Research Paper Series Internationalisation of Economic Policy Endogenous Pollution Havens: Does Fdi Influence Environmental Regulations? the Authors Endogenous Pollution Havens: Does Fdi Influence Environmental Regulations? , 2022 .

[42]  Nathan Nunn,et al.  Relationship Specificity, Incomplete Contracts and the Pattern of Trade , 2007 .

[43]  J. Aizenman,et al.  FDI and Trade - Two Way Linkages? , 2005 .

[44]  H. Welsch Corruption, growth, and the environment: a cross-country analysis , 2004, Environment and Development Economics.

[45]  J. List,et al.  Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: theory and evidence , 2003 .

[46]  D. O'Rourke Motivating a conflicted environmental state: Community-driven regulation in Vietnam , 2002 .

[47]  Leon Zurawicki,et al.  Country-level investments and the effect of corruption -- some empirical evidence , 2001 .

[48]  Ramón López,et al.  Corruption, Pollution, and the Kuznets Environment Curve , 2000 .

[49]  Daniel Treisman,et al.  The causes of corruption: a cross-national study , 2000 .

[50]  L. de Mello,et al.  Corruption and Military Spending , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[51]  P. J. Beck,et al.  A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets , 1986 .