Marchand’s analysis of back-formation revisited: Back-formation as a type of conversion

Marchand (1960; 1969) presents a unique analysis of back-formation (e.g., editor N > edit V ) as a combination of zero-derivation ( editor N > editor V ) and clipping ( editor V > edit V ). This paper will take a closer look at his analysis and argue that its revised version, which uses the notion of conversion rather than zero-derivation, is superior to the mainstream analyses of back-formation. Citing a lot of instances of back-formed verbs, we will show that back-formation does not necessarily delete an affix (e.g., liaison N > liaise V ), and that it is semantically parallel not to affixation (e.g., film N > filmize V ) but to conversion (e.g., referee N > referee V ). Almost all the preceding analyses fail to deal with these facts, for they are based on the assumption that back-formation deletes a (supposed) affix, or it is the reverse of affixation. Our new analysis, on the other hand, is free from this traditional assumption and can account for various properties of back-formation, including the ab...

[1]  Hiroyuki Oshita,et al.  Compounds: A View from Suffixation and A-Structure Alteration , 1995 .

[2]  W. U. Wurzel,et al.  On Morphological Naturalness , 1984, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[3]  Valerie Adams,et al.  An Introduction To Modern English Word Formation , 1973 .

[4]  Rochelle Lieber,et al.  English Word-Formation Processes , 2005 .

[5]  R. Quirk.  A Grammar of contemporary English , 1974 .

[6]  Akiko Nagano.  THE STATUS OF BACK-FORMATION AND MORPHEME-BASEDNESS OF ENGLISH MORPHOLOGY , 2006 .

[7]  Simeon Potter,et al.  A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part V: Syntax, Fourth Volume@@@A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI: Morphology , 1947 .

[8]  O. Jespersen.  A modern English grammar on historical principles , 1928 .

[9]  Mark Aronoff,et al.  Word Formation in Generative Grammar , 1979 .

[10]  Valerie Adams,et al.  Complex Words in English , 2001 .

[11]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  English Word-Formation: Frontmatter , 1983 .

[12]  Stavros Skopeteas,et al.  Base and direction of derivation , 2000 .

[13]  J. Ayto,et al.  Twentieth Century Words , 1999 .

[14]  Clarence Lewis Barnhart,et al.  Third Barnhart dictionary of new English , 1990 .

[15]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  The Lexicon in Acquisition , 1996 .

[16]  Clarence Lewis Barnhart,et al.  A dictionary of new English : 1963-1972 , 1973 .

[17]  Esko V. Pennanen.  Contributions to the study of back-formation in English , 1966 .

[18]  D. Gary Miller,et al.  Complex verb formation , 1993 .

[19]  Rochelle Lieber,et al.  Morphology and Lexical Semantics , 2004 .

[20]  H. Marchand.  The categories and types of present-day English word-formation : a synchronic-diachronic approach , 1960 .

[21]  Henry Louis Mencken,et al.  The American Language: An Inquiry Into the Development of English in the United States , 1919 .

[22]  Julia Elliott,et al.  The Oxford dictionary of new words , 1997 .

[23]  Geert Booij,et al.  The grammar of words : an introduction to linguistic morphology , 2005 .

[24]  I. Plag.  Morphological Productivity , 1999 .

[25]  Wolfgang U. Dressler,et al.  I. Word formation as part of natural morphology , 1987 .

[26]  Ingo Plag,et al.  Word-Formation in English , 2018 .

[27]  Thomas Becker,et al.  Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology , 1993 .

[28]  R. Jackendoff.  Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon , 1975 .

[29]  Robert A. Hall.  How We Noun-Incorporate in English , 1956 .

[30]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  When Nouns Surface as Verbs , 1979 .