A Diagnostic Tool for Assessing the Relative Importance of Information in Impression Formation: Application in Order Effects

This paper describes a diagnostic tool for assessing relative impact weights of time-dependent information on an impression or judgment and illustrates its use in the area of order effects. A novel and somewhat counterintuitive finding, based on applying this tool, is that the bit of information associated with the greatest impact weight is not necessarily the bit of information associated with the greatest relative impact weight. At the heart of this tool is the ability to compute precisely the relative impact weights associated with each piece of information, which are, in general, different from the actual impact weights associated with each piece of information. This provides the opportunity to determine relative impact weights under various assumptions about, and theories of, or related to, impression formation. In turn, this diagnostic information may be used to deepen understanding of a particular theory or, perhaps, to propose or define new theory.

[1]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Order effects in belief updating with consistent and inconsistent evidence , 1993 .

[2]  Leonard Adelman,et al.  Demonstrating the effect of context on order effects for an army air defense task using the patriot simulator , 1997 .

[3]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Order Effects in Personnel Decision Making , 1997 .

[4]  A. Maldonado,et al.  The belief revision model: asymmetrical effects of noncontingency on human covariation learning , 1999 .

[5]  Jodie Woolcock,et al.  Group impressions as dynamic configurations: the tensor product model of group impression formation and change. , 2000, Psychological review.

[6]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. , 1961 .

[7]  M. Kaplan.  2 – JUDGMENT BY JURIES , 1977 .

[8]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Causation and Association , 1996 .

[9]  Dirk Van Rooy,et al.  When more observations are better than less: a connectionist account of the acquisition of causal strength , 2001 .

[10]  Elliot E. Entin,et al.  Sequential revision of belief: an application to complex decision making situations , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[11]  Ephraim Nissan,et al.  Belief Revision as Applied within a Descriptive Model of Jury Deliberations , 2001 .

[12]  S. Ahlawat,et al.  Order effects and memory for evidence in individual versus group decision making in auditing , 1999 .

[13]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Contributions to information integration theory , 1991 .

[14]  P. Thagard,et al.  FORMING IMPRESSIONS FROM STEREOTYPES, TRAITS, AND BEHAVIORS : A PARALLEL-CONSTRAINT-SATISFACTION THEORY , 1996 .

[15]  Luc De Raedt,et al.  Belief Updating from Integrity Constraints and Queries , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Mario J. Maletta,et al.  Primacy Effects and the Role of Risk in Auditor Belief-Revision Processes , 1999 .

[17]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  An integration theory analysis of jurors' presumptions of guilt or innocence. , 1978 .

[18]  R. H. Stewart.  EFFECT OF CONTINUOUS RESPONDING ON THE ORDER EFFECT IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION FORMATION. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[20]  S. K. Asare,et al.  The auditors' going concern opinion decision: Interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence. , 1989 .

[21]  Eric N. Johnson.  Effects of information order, group assistance, and experience on auditors' sequential belief revision , 1995 .

[22]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[24]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  A Distributed Memory Model of Averaging Phenomena in Person Impression Formation , 1994 .

[25]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[27]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[28]  Johanna Helena Kerstholt,et al.  Judicial decision making: order of evidence presentation and availability of background information , 1998 .

[29]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Message Order Effects in Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Perspective , 1994 .

[30]  Brad Tuttle,et al.  An examination of market efficiency: Information order effects in a laboratory market , 1997 .

[31]  Hongbin Wang,et al.  Order Effects in Human Belief Revision , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[32]  M. Kaplan,et al.  Human judgment and decision processes in applied settings , 1977 .

[33]  J. Baron,et al.  Exploring the role of order effects in person trade-off elicitations. , 2002, Health policy.

[34]  S. Diamond.  Truth, justice, and the jury , 2003 .