Organisation Preparedness and Information Technology Acquisition Success: An Assessment Model

Business processes have been exploiting the continual growth of information technology, and therefore, with complexity. Without adequate IT support, an organization can hardly survive these days. IT acquisition involves two important process dimensions, one, suppliers’ capability to adequately evaluate the IT needs of the organization and two, users’ capability to properly assess its own IT requirements. Due to mismatch in the understanding of the IT dimension by business process owners and business dimension by IT managers, IT acquisition in many cases result in failures. User’s involvement may help an organisation to prevent post acquisition shocks. This paper first discusses users, IT acquisition process and its phases. It further discusses a model to ascertain organisation’s preparedness based on preparedness of Users, information system, technology in the pre-IT acquisition process. Through this case based research, the model is tested to examine the role of organisational preparedness to predict the health of the future IT acquisition.

[1]  Jon B. Woodroof,et al.  Satisfaction/dissatisfaction: are users predisposed? , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Pankaj Jalote,et al.  CMM in Practice: Processes for Executing Software Projects at Infosys , 1999 .

[3]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Dimensions of Information Systems Success , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Peter Weill,et al.  Firm Context and Patterns of IT Infrastructure Capability (Best Paper Award) , 1996, ICIS.

[5]  Judith Gebauer,et al.  Modeling the IT-Infrastructure of Inter- Organizational Processes - Automation vs. Flexibility , 1997 .

[6]  Qing Hu,et al.  Integrating Web Services with Competitive Strategies: A Balanced Scorecard Approach , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Narayan S. Umanath The concept of contingency beyond "It depends": illustrations from IS research stream , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Timo Jokela Review of Usability Capability Assessment Approaches , 2001 .

[9]  Roger S. Pressman,et al.  Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach , 1982 .

[10]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  C. Sophie Lee,et al.  Modeling the business value of information technology , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Experiences in Strategic Information Systems Planning , 1993, MIS Q..

[13]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons From Two Longitudinal Case Studies , 1998, MIS Q..

[15]  Timo Jokela Assessment of User-Centred Design Processes - Lessons Learnt and Conclusions , 2002, PROFES.

[16]  Agnar Aamodt,et al.  CASE-BASED REASONING: FOUNDATIONAL ISSUES, METHODOLOGICAL VARIATIONS, AND SYSTEM APPROACHES AICOM - ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATIONS , 1994 .

[17]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Jerry N. Luftman Assessing It/Business Alignment , 2003, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[19]  Charles Møller,et al.  Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems , 2004 .

[20]  RaiArun,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models , 2002 .

[21]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Factors affecting information systems planning effectiveness: organizational contexts and planning systems dimensions , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[23]  Timo Jokela,et al.  Development of Management Commitment to Software Process Improvement , 2000 .

[24]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[25]  Mark Lycett,et al.  Migrating Agile Methods to Standardized Development Practice , 2003, Computer.

[26]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[27]  Sarah A. Sheard The Frameworks Quagmire, A Brief Look , 1997 .

[28]  Gayle J. Yaverbaum,et al.  Critical Factors in the User Environment: An Experimental Study of Users, Organizations and Tasks , 1988, MIS Q..

[29]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  H. K. Mishra,et al.  A User-centric IT Acquisition Model , 2003 .

[31]  Kavin W. Moody,et al.  New Meaning to it Alignment , 2003, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[32]  Kenneth A. Kozar,et al.  The Impact of Computer Alienation on Information Technology INvestment Decisions: An Exploratory Cross-National Analysis , 1995, MIS Q..

[33]  Yannis Bakopoulos,et al.  Toward a More Precise Concept of Information Technology , 2015, ICIS.