Consistent segregated staggered schemes with explicit steps for the isentropic and full Euler equations

In this paper, we build and analyze the stability and consistency of decoupled schemes, involving only explicit steps, for the isentropic Euler equations and for the full Euler equations. These schemes are based on staggered space discretizations, with an upwinding performed with respect to the material velocity only. The pressure gradient is defined as the transpose of the natural velocity divergence, and is thus centered. The velocity convection term is built in such a way that the solutions satisfy a discrete kinetic energy balance, with a remainder term at the left-hand side which is shown to be non-negative under a CFL condition. In the case of the full Euler equations, we solve the internal energy balance, to avoid the space discretization of the total energy, whose expression involves cell-centered and face-centered variables. However, since the residual terms in the kinetic energy balance (probably) do not tend to zero with the time and space steps when computing shock solutions, we compensate them by corrective terms in the internal energy equation, to make the scheme consistent with the conservative form of the continuous problem. We then show, in one space dimension, that, if the scheme converges, the limit is indeed an entropy weak solution of the system. In any case, the discretization preserves by construction the convex of admissible states (positivity of the density and, for Euler equations, of the internal energy), under a CFL condition. Finally, we present numerical results which confort this theory.

[1]  M. Liou,et al.  A New Flux Splitting Scheme , 1993 .

[2]  Raphaèle Herbin,et al.  An unconditionally stable staggered pressure correction scheme for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2016 .

[3]  Jean-Luc Guermond,et al.  Entropy-based nonlinear viscosity for Fourier approximations of conservation laws , 2008 .

[4]  Kinetic energy control in the MAC discretization of compressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2010 .

[5]  Meng-Sing Liou,et al.  A sequel to AUSM, Part II: AUSM+-up for all speeds , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  Jean-Claude Latché,et al.  An L2‐stable approximation of the Navier–Stokes convection operator for low‐order non‐conforming finite elements , 2011 .

[7]  F. Bouchut Nonlinear Stability of Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws: and Well-Balanced Schemes for Sources , 2005 .

[8]  B. Larrouturou How to preserve the mass fractions positivity when computing compressible multi-component flows , 1991 .

[9]  R. Herbin,et al.  Staggered discretizations, pressure correction schemes and all speed barotropic flows , 2011 .

[10]  P. Raviart,et al.  Conforming and nonconforming finite element methods for solving the stationary Stokes equations I , 1973 .

[11]  Raphaèle Herbin,et al.  EXPLICIT STAGGERED SCHEMES FOR THE COMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATIONS , 2013 .

[12]  R. Herbin,et al.  On some implicit and semi-implicit staggered schemes for the shallow water and Euler equations , 2014 .

[13]  Jean-Luc Guermond,et al.  Entropy viscosity method for nonlinear conservation laws , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[14]  R. Rannacher,et al.  Simple nonconforming quadrilateral Stokes element , 1992 .

[15]  Raphaèle Herbin,et al.  STAGGERED SCHEMES FOR ALL SPEED FLOWS , 2012 .

[16]  A. A. Amsden,et al.  A numerical fluid dynamics calculation method for all flow speeds , 1971 .

[17]  E. Toro Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics , 1997 .

[18]  F. Harlow,et al.  Numerical Calculation of Time‐Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface , 1965 .

[19]  P. G. Ciarlet,et al.  Basic error estimates for elliptic problems , 1991 .

[20]  P. Raviart,et al.  Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws , 1996, Applied Mathematical Sciences.