Quantitative analysis of wound healing

In this article, we initially review several problems associated with the design and interpretation of certain types of experiments currently used to study wound healing, drawing attention to the fact that applications for standard statistical techniques in the analysis of the experimental results are often of limited value. We then argue that, because of the special nature of wound healing data, curve fitting of empirical model equations can often provide a convenient way to summarize treatment effects with large data sets. The various ways in which this technique could be used to facilitate the interpretation of experimental wound healing results are then explored. To illustrate this approach, we then took several wound healing experiments and introduced possible models that could be used, paying particular attention to simple equations with the smallest possible number of parameters. For each equation, the way that the parameters of the model could be interpreted with regard to the biologic effects represented is given. Examples are given to show the application of each model discussed theoretically in the interpretation of some typical experimental data sets.

[1]  B. Fadem,et al.  Care and breeding of the gray, short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) , 1982, Laboratory animal science.

[2]  I. K. Cohen,et al.  Fetal response to injury in the rabbit. , 1987, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[3]  D. Foreman,et al.  Neutralisation of TGF-β 1 and TGF-β 2 or exogenous addition of TGF-β 3 to cutaneous rat wounds reduces scarring , 1995 .

[4]  William G. Bardsley,et al.  The F test for model discrimination with exponential functions , 1986 .

[5]  Paul Martin,et al.  Actin cables and epidermal movement in embryonic wound healing , 1992, Nature.

[6]  M. Raff,et al.  Social controls on cell survival and cell death , 1992, Nature.

[7]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Ontogeny of the skin and the transition from scar-free to scarring phenotype during wound healing in the pouch young of a marsupial, Monodelphis domestica. , 1995, Developmental biology.

[8]  J. Stapleton Introduction to Probability Theory and Statistical Inference , 1970 .

[9]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Immunohistochemical localization of growth factors in fetal wound healing. , 1991, Developmental biology.

[10]  A. Kingsnorth,et al.  Peptide growth factors and wound healing , 1991, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  L. Schwartz,et al.  An ontogenic study of the acute inflammatory reaction in the fetal rhesus monkey. I. Cellular response to bacterial and nonbacterial irritants. , 1974, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[12]  William G. Bardsley,et al.  Optimal design for model discrimination using the F-test with non-linear biochemical models. Criteria for choosing the number and spacing of experimental points , 1989 .

[13]  K. Holbrook,et al.  Embryogenesis of the Dermis in Human Skin , 1986, Pediatric dermatology.

[14]  D. Foreman,et al.  Neutralising antibody to TGF-beta 1,2 reduces cutaneous scarring in adult rodents. , 1994, Journal of cell science.