A rule-based firing model for neural networks

Full multi-compartment multi-channel neu- ron models are state of the art for single neuron modeling but are CPU intensive. This makes them unsuitable for network modeling, where simulation of 10,000 or more neurons is desirable. For this reason, most network mod- els utilize highly simplified models such as single state- variable integrate-and-fire units. This compromise has the disadvantage of eliminating most biological detail, much of which can be expected to lead to interesting and important network behavior. To reconcile these opposing computational and biological demands, we developed a rule-based firing (RBF) model incorporating a number of synaptic and cellular responses which are activated as needed. The rules produce effects that include adaptation, bursting, depolarization blockade, Mg-sensitive NMDA conductance, and post-inhibitory rebound. By utilizing pre-calculated waveforms and avoiding linked differential equations, network simulations are entirely event-driven, with no integration overhead. The model has been further optimized by use of table look-ups in lieu of run-time calculation.

[1]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  In vivo, in vitro, and computational analysis of dendritic calcium currents in thalamic reticular neurons , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  Discrete event simulation in the NEURON environment , 2004, Neurocomputing.

[3]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  Expanding NEURON's Repertoire of Mechanisms with NMODL , 2000, Neural Computation.

[4]  M L Hines,et al.  Neuron: A Tool for Neuroscientists , 2001, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[5]  Michael L. Hines,et al.  Independent Variable Time-Step Integration of Individual Neurons for Network Simulations , 2005, Neural Computation.

[6]  S N Davies,et al.  Paired‐pulse depression of monosynaptic GABA‐mediated inhibitory postsynaptic responses in rat hippocampus. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  CE Jahr,et al.  A quantitative description of NMDA receptor-channel kinetic behavior , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  William W. Lytton,et al.  From Computer to Brain: Foundations of Computational Neuroscience , 2002 .

[9]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Arithmetic of Subthreshold Synaptic Summation in a Model CA1 Pyramidal Cell , 2003, Neuron.

[10]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Self-adjusting binary trees , 1983, STOC.

[11]  Douglas W. Jones,et al.  An empirical comparison of priority-queue and event-set implementations , 1986, CACM.

[12]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  G protein activation kinetics and spillover of gamma-aminobutyric acid may account for differences between inhibitory responses in the hippocampus and thalamus. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Dynamics of networks of randomly connected excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons , 2000, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[14]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Dynamics and plasticity of stimulus-selective persistent activity in cortical network models. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  T. J. Sejnowski,et al.  Control of slow oscillations in the thalamocortical neuron: a computer model , 1996, Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Nicoll,et al.  A physiological role for GABAB receptors in the central nervous system , 1988, Nature.