How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map.

OBJECTIVE Significant advances have been made in the development of decision support interventions, also called decision aids, for patients facing difficult or uncertain decisions. However, challenges related to the definition, the theoretical underpinnings, the relative contribution of different components and how to migrate these tools to the Internet, remain unresolved. We propose a systematic process map for others to consider as they develop web-based, perhaps multimedia, decision support interventions and to examine the future challenges faced by developers. METHODS Based on our experiences of developing and evaluating web-based decision support interventions, we outline a process map to illustrate the general principles of content specification followed by creative design and tailoring to the target audience. RESULTS Content specification is fundamental and it should go beyond the traditional emphasis on scientific evidence in order to ensure patients' perspectives on the proposed options. The creative design phase aims to develop a medium to achieve three fundamental tasks: present information; achieve accurate affective forecasting; provide a basis for preference construction. This phase should be an open to experimentation and, where empirical work may be difficult or not yet available, guided by consultation with users, using an iterative method of trial and adaptation. CONCLUSION There is little empirical research on how best to achieve these tasks. The guiding principle needs to be one of customising the delivery, based on close consultation with the target users and an iterative development process until the intervention is deemed accessible and useful. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The process map provides a basis for further developments and outlines areas where remaining challenges need further investigation.

[1]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Affective Forecasting , 2005 .

[2]  M. Versluijs,et al.  A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Toward a Model for Field-Testing Patient Decision-Support Technologies: A Qualitative Field-Testing Study , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  A systematic review of information in decision aids , 2007, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[5]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  Dominick L Frosch,et al.  Internet patient decision support: a randomized controlled trial comparing alternative approaches for men considering prostate cancer screening. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  Steve Krug,et al.  Don't Make Me Think!: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability , 2000 .

[8]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Decision Support Technologies Using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi) , 2009, PloS one.

[9]  Aileen Clarke,et al.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Design and usability of heuristic‐based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis , 2012, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[11]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[12]  P Tugwell,et al.  A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. , 1998, Patient education and counseling.

[13]  Patricia Wright,et al.  Designing an interactive decision explorer , 2003 .

[14]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Stakeholder field-testing of amnioDex: A patient decision support intervention for amniocentesis , 2012 .

[15]  M. Brundage,et al.  Overall information needs of early-stage prostate cancer patients over a decade: highly variable and remarkably stable , 2009, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[16]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Implementation Science BioMed Central Debate , 2009 .

[17]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Supporting Informed Decision Making for Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing on the Web: An Online Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  Dawn Stacey,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.