Unraveling the mechanism of the cadherin-catenin-actin catch bond

The adherens junctions between epithelial cells involve a protein complex formed by E-cadherin, β-catenin, α-catenin and F-actin. The stability of this complex was a puzzle for many years, since in vitro studies could reconstitute various stable subsets of the individual proteins, but never the entirety. The missing ingredient turned out to be mechanical tension: a recent experiment that applied physiological forces to the complex with an optical tweezer dramatically increased its lifetime, a phenomenon known as catch bonding. However, in the absence of a crystal structure for the full complex, the microscopic details of the catch bond mechanism remain mysterious. Building on structural clues that point to α-catenin as the force transducer, we present a quantitative theoretical model for how the catch bond arises, fully accounting for the experimental lifetime distributions. The underlying hypothesis is that force induces a rotational transition between two conformations of α-catenin, overcoming a significant energy barrier due to a network of salt bridges. This transition allosterically regulates the energies at the interface between α-catenin and F-actin. The model allows us to predict these energetic changes, as well as highlighting the importance of the salt bridge rotational barrier. By stabilizing one of the α-catenin states, this barrier could play a role in how the complex responds to additional in vivo binding partners like vinculin. Since significant conformational energy barriers are a common feature of other adhesion systems that exhibit catch bonds, our model can be adapted into a general theoretical framework for integrating structure and function in a variety of force-regulated protein complexes.

[1]  G. Rose,et al.  Structure and energetics of the hydrogen-bonded backbone in protein folding. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[2]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  JCB_200810002 1275..1284 , 2009 .

[3]  Gerhard Wagner,et al.  Force-dependent transition in the T-cell receptor β-subunit allosterically regulates peptide discrimination and pMHC bond lifetime , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Oleg V Prezhdo,et al.  The two-pathway model for the catch-slip transition in biological adhesion. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[5]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[6]  Alan Rick Horwitz,et al.  Actin-Based Adhesion Modules Mediate Cell Interactions with the Extracellular Matrix and Neighboring Cells. , 2017, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[7]  David L Rimm,et al.  Direct Interaction of the C-Terminal Domain of α-Catenin and F-Actin is Necessary for Stabilized Cell-Cell Adhesion , 2006, Cell communication & adhesion.

[8]  William I. Weis,et al.  Deconstructing the Cadherin-Catenin-Actin Complex , 2005, Cell.

[9]  William I. Weis,et al.  α-Catenin Is a Molecular Switch that Binds E-Cadherin-β-Catenin and Regulates Actin-Filament Assembly , 2005, Cell.

[10]  B. Gumbiner,et al.  Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  José N Onuchic,et al.  Jamming proteins with slipknots and their free energy landscape. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[12]  Ron Elber,et al.  Catch bond-like kinetics of helix cracking: network analysis by molecular dynamics and milestoning. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  Jie Yan,et al.  Force-dependent conformational switch of α-catenin controls vinculin binding , 2014, Nature Communications.

[14]  Valeri Vasioukhin,et al.  Adherens junctions and cancer. , 2012, Sub-cellular biochemistry.

[15]  Hui Li,et al.  Resolving the molecular mechanism of cadherin catch bond formation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[16]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  Structural basis for selectin mechanochemistry , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  E. Rangarajan,et al.  Dimer asymmetry defines α-catenin interactions , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[18]  Oleg V Prezhdo,et al.  Allosteric role of the large-scale domain opening in biological catch-binding. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Ultrastable cellulosome-adhesion complex tightens under load , 2014, Nature Communications.

[20]  Jizhong Lou,et al.  Flow-enhanced adhesion regulated by a selectin interdomain hinge , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  Niels Volkmann,et al.  The minimal cadherin-catenin complex binds to actin filaments under force , 2014, Science.

[22]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[23]  Junwu,et al.  Dynamic Visualization of a-C , 2015 .

[24]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules , 2003, Nature.

[25]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Bacterial Adhesion to Target Cells Enhanced by Shear Force , 2002, Cell.

[26]  Byoung Choul Kim,et al.  Notch-Jagged complex structure implicates a catch bond in tuning ligand sensitivity , 2017, Science.

[27]  Changbong Hyeon,et al.  Directly measuring single-molecule heterogeneity using force spectroscopy , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Michael Hinczewski,et al.  Force-dependent switch in protein unfolding pathways and transition-state movements , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  W. Somers,et al.  Insights into the Molecular Basis of Leukocyte Tethering and Rolling Revealed by Structures of P- and E-Selectin Bound to SLeX and PSGL-1 , 2000, Cell.

[30]  Yang Zhang,et al.  The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction , 2014, Nature Methods.

[31]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  An Autoinhibited Structure of α-Catenin and Its Implications for Vinculin Recruitment to Adherens Junctions* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  Olga Yakovenko,et al.  FimH Forms Catch Bonds That Are Enhanced by Mechanical Force Due to Allosteric Regulation* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Michael Hinczewski,et al.  Plasticity of hydrogen bond networks regulates mechanochemistry of cell adhesion complexes , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Jongseong Kim,et al.  A mechanically stabilized receptor–ligand flex-bond important in the vasculature , 2010, Nature.

[35]  Christopher W. Bielawski,et al.  Molecular catch bonds and the anti-Hammond effect in polymer mechanochemistry. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  William I. Weis,et al.  The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin , 2001, Cell.

[37]  William I. Weis,et al.  Structure of the Dimerization and β-Catenin- Binding Region of α-Catenin , 2000 .

[38]  John D Chodera,et al.  The molten globule state is unusually deformable under mechanical force , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Mechanical switching and coupling between two dissociation pathways in a P-selectin adhesion bond. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Tamir Gonen,et al.  Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments , 2010, Nature.

[41]  Joanna I. Sulkowska,et al.  Jamming Proteins with Slipknots and Their Free Energy Landscape , 2010 .

[42]  Mitsuhiko Ikura,et al.  Structural Determinants of the Mechanical Stability of α-Catenin* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  S. Yonemura,et al.  α-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[44]  H Weissig,et al.  Assembly of the cadherin-catenin complex in vitro with recombinant proteins. , 1994, Journal of cell science.

[45]  Jizhong Lou,et al.  A structure-based sliding-rebinding mechanism for catch bonds. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[46]  Yang Zhang,et al.  I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction , 2010, Nature Protocols.

[47]  D L Rimm,et al.  Alpha 1(E)-catenin is an actin-binding and -bundling protein mediating the attachment of F-actin to the membrane adhesion complex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  William I. Weis,et al.  Vinculin Forms a Directionally Asymmetric Catch Bond with F-Actin , 2018 .

[49]  V Barsegov,et al.  Dynamics of unbinding of cell adhesion molecules: transition from catch to slip bonds. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Michael Hinczewski,et al.  Phenomenological and microscopic theories for catch bonds. , 2016, Journal of structural biology.

[51]  G. Klebe,et al.  Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.

[52]  William H Guilford,et al.  Mechanics of actomyosin bonds in different nucleotide states are tuned to muscle contraction. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  W. Weis,et al.  25 Years of Tension over Actin Binding to the Cadherin Cell Adhesion Complex: The Devil is in the Details. , 2016, Trends in cell biology.