Managing Communication in New Product Development Process: Virtual R&D Teams and Information Technology

Literature proves the importance of the role of information technology in increasing the effectiveness of virtual R&D teams’ communication for new product development. However, the factors that make information technology construct in a virtual R&D team are still ambiguous. Managers of virtual R&D teams for new product development do not know “which type of technology should be used”. To address the gap and answer the question, the paper presents a set of factors that make a construct that contribute to effective communication strategy for virtual R&D teams. The proposed construct has been modified based on the findings of a field survey. This work empirically examines the relationship between information technology construct and its factors by employing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). A measurement model is built based on the 19 preliminary chosen factors that have been extracted from literature review. The result shows that 10 factors can make a technology construct. These 10 factors can be grouped into two different constructs, namely Web-based communication and Web-based data sharing. The study findings can help new product developers to concentrate on the main factors for leading effective communications among virtual R&D team members. In addition, this work provides a guideline for software developers to create appropriate tools for virtual R&D teams.

[1]  S. Sills,et al.  Innovations in Survey Research , 2002 .

[2]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[3]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Self-assessment of conflict management in client-supplier collaborative new product development , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[4]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  External technology integration in product and process development , 2004 .

[5]  Chi-Cheng Huang.  Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan , 2009 .

[6]  K. Hinson,et al.  Handbook of Research on Virtual Workplaces and the New Nature of Business Practices (Zemliansky, P. and St. Amant, K.) [Book Review] , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[7]  Daphne M. Dekker,et al.  Cultural differences in the perception of critical interaction behaviors in global virtual teams , 2008 .

[8]  Minder Chen,et al.  TeamSpirit: Design, implementation, and evaluation of a Web-based group decision support system , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Chad Lin,et al.  A model to develop effective virtual teams , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  S. Sills,et al.  Innovations in Survey Research , 2002 .

[11]  J. Kratzer,et al.  Keeping Virtual R&D Teams Creative , 2005 .

[12]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  It's the Thought that Counts: The Mediating Effects of Information Processing in Virtual Team Decision Making , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[13]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  CAIRO: a concurrent engineering meeting environment for virtual design teams , 2000, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[14]  Justin B. Craig,et al.  Fueling Innovation through Information Technology in SMEs* , 2008 .

[15]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[16]  Shamsuddin Ahmed Mohammed Shahadat,et al.  Virtual R&D teams and SMEs growth: A comparative study between Iranian and Malaysian SMEs , 2010 .

[17]  Linda R. Elliott,et al.  Empowering followers in virtual teams: Guiding principles from theory and practice , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on Computer personnel research: The global information technology workforce , 2007 .

[19]  Elitsa Vasileva Shumarova,et al.  Authority-based and bottom-up diffusion of collaboration information technologies: constraints and enablements , 2009 .

[20]  Shamsuddin Ahmed,et al.  Virtual R&D teams in small and medium enterprises: a literature review , 2009 .

[21]  Zahari Taha,et al.  Virtual Teams: A Literature Review , 2009 .

[22]  Nader Ale Ebrahim,et al.  Modified stage-gate: A conceptual model of virtual product development process , 2009 .

[23]  M. Rita Thissen,et al.  Communication tools for distributed software development teams , 2007, SIGMIS CPR '07.

[24]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[26]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective , 2003 .

[27]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[29]  Miguel López-Coronado,et al.  A model for the assessment and development of Internet-based information and communication services in small and medium enterprises , 2008 .

[30]  David Coleman,et al.  Collaboration 2.0: Technology and Best Practices for Successful Collaboration in a Web 2.0 World , 2008 .

[31]  Nader Ale Ebrahim,et al.  The Effectiveness of Virtual R&D Teams in SMEs: Experiences of Malaysian SMEs , 2012, ArXiv.

[32]  Liz Lee-Kelley,et al.  Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study , 2008 .

[33]  R. Baskerville,et al.  Activating and Perpetuating Virtual Teams: Now That We're Mobile, Where Do We Go? , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[34]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with AMOS , 2010 .

[35]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels , 2001, Internet Res..