Exploring Neural Mechanisms of Reward Processing Using Coupled Matrix Tensor Factorization: A Simultaneous EEG–fMRI Investigation

Background: It is crucial to understand the neural feedback mechanisms and the cognitive decision-making of the brain during the processing of rewards. Here, we report the first attempt for a simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG)–functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study in a gambling task by utilizing tensor decomposition. Methods: First, the single-subject EEG data are represented as a third-order spectrogram tensor to extract frequency features. Next, the EEG and fMRI data are jointly decomposed into a superposition of multiple sources characterized by space-time-frequency profiles using coupled matrix tensor factorization (CMTF). Finally, graph-structured clustering is used to select the most appropriate model according to four quantitative indices. Results: The results clearly show that not only are the regions of interest (ROIs) found in other literature activated, but also the olfactory cortex and fusiform gyrus which are usually ignored. It is found that regions including the orbitofrontal cortex and insula are activated for both winning and losing stimuli. Meanwhile, regions such as the superior orbital frontal gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex are activated upon winning stimuli, whereas the inferior frontal gyrus, cingulate cortex, and medial superior frontal gyrus are activated upon losing stimuli. Conclusion: This work sheds light on the reward-processing progress, provides a deeper understanding of brain function, and opens a new avenue in the investigation of neurovascular coupling via CMTF.

[1]  L. Concha,et al.  Preservation of EEG spectral power features during simultaneous EEG-fMRI , 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[2]  Zhiqin Zhu,et al.  Brain tumor segmentation based on the fusion of deep semantics and edge information in multimodal MRI , 2022, Inf. Fusion.

[3]  G. Hossein-Zadeh,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity estimation for neurofeedback emotion regulation paradigm with simultaneous EEG-fMRI analysis , 2022, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[4]  Ling Zou,et al.  Source localization and functional network analysis in emotion cognitive reappraisal with EEG-fMRI integration , 2022, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[5]  T. Warbrick Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: What Have We Learned and What Does the Future Hold? , 2022, Sensors.

[6]  L. De Lathauwer,et al.  Early soft and flexible fusion of electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging via double coupled matrix tensor factorization for multisubject group analysis , 2021, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Guillaume Sescousse,et al.  Electrophysiological underpinnings of reward processing: Are we exploiting the full potential of EEG? , 2021, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. Sereno,et al.  Inferior Occipital Gyrus Is Organized along Common Gradients of Spatial and Face-Part Selectivity , 2021, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh,et al.  Correlated coupled matrix tensor factorization method for simultaneous EEG-fMRI data fusion , 2020, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[10]  G. Hossein-Zadeh,et al.  Probing fMRI brain connectivity and activity changes during emotion regulation by EEG neurofeedback , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[11]  Simon Van Eyndhoven,et al.  Augmenting interictal mapping with neurovascular coupling biomarkers by structured factorization of epileptic EEG and fMRI data , 2020, NeuroImage.

[12]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Tensor-based Blind fMRI Source Separation Without the Gaussian Noise Assumption — A β-Divergence Approach , 2019, 2019 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP).

[13]  Simon Van Eyndhoven,et al.  Identifying Stable Components of Matrix /Tensor Factorizations via Low-Rank Approximation of Inter-Factorization Similarity , 2019, 2019 27th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[14]  K. Chen,et al.  Orbitofrontal dysfunction during the reward process in adults with ADHD: An fMRI study , 2019, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Yingchun Zhang,et al.  Underlying modulators of frontal global field potentials in emotion regulation: an EEG-informed fMRI study , 2019, 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[16]  Cheng Luo,et al.  BOLD-fMRI activity informed by network variation of scalp EEG in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy , 2019, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[17]  R. Kleiser,et al.  Neurobiological processes during the Cambridge gambling task , 2019, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  Narun Pornpattananangkul,et al.  Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing. , 2018, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[19]  A. Dagher,et al.  Spatio–temporal patterns of cognitive control revealed with simultaneous electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Anna Weinberg,et al.  Reward and feedback processing: State of the field, best practices, and future directions. , 2018, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  Bin He,et al.  Electrophysiological Source Imaging: A Noninvasive Window to Brain Dynamics. , 2018, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[22]  M. Potenza,et al.  Individual differences in self-reported reward-approach tendencies relate to resting-state and reward-task-based fMRI measures. , 2018, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[23]  Tommy H. Ng,et al.  Meta-analysis of reward processing in major depressive disorder reveals distinct abnormalities within the reward circuit , 2018, bioRxiv.

[24]  J Matias Palva,et al.  Fluctuations of the EEG‐fMRI correlation reflect intrinsic strength of functional connectivity in default mode network , 2018, Journal of neuroscience research.

[25]  Yingchun Zhang,et al.  Characterization of dynamic changes of current source localization based on spatiotemporal fMRI constrained EEG source imaging , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  The Error-Related Negativity , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[27]  Kai Wang,et al.  Clustering-Constrained ICA for Ballistocardiogram Artifacts Removal in Simultaneous EEG-fMRI , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[28]  Bogdan Alexandru Cociu,et al.  Multimodal Functional and Structural Brain Connectivity Analysis in Autism: A Preliminary Integrated Approach With EEG, fMRI, and DTI , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

[29]  Simon Van Eyndhoven,et al.  Flexible fusion of electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging: Revealing neural-hemodynamic coupling through structured matrix-tensor factorization , 2017, 2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[30]  Ling Zou,et al.  Single‐trial EEG‐informed fMRI analysis of emotional decision problems in hot executive function , 2017, Brain and behavior.

[31]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Tensor-based fusion of EEG and FMRI to understand neurological changes in schizophrenia , 2016, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).

[32]  Nico Vervliet,et al.  Tensorlab 3.0 — Numerical optimization strategies for large-scale constrained and coupled matrix/tensor factorization , 2016, 2016 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[33]  Wim Van Paesschen,et al.  Fusion of electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore epileptic network activity , 2016, 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[34]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  DPABI: Data Processing & Analysis for (Resting-State) Brain Imaging , 2016, Neuroinformatics.

[35]  K. Zilles,et al.  The anatomical and functional specialization of the fusiform gyrus , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  Principal components analysis of reward prediction errors in a reinforcement learning task , 2016, NeuroImage.

[37]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Structure-revealing data fusion , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[38]  Yong He,et al.  BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  Lilianne R. Mujica-Parodi,et al.  Ventral striatal and medial prefrontal BOLD activation is correlated with reward-related electrocortical activity: A combined ERP and fMRI study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[40]  Arnaud D'Argembeau,et al.  The Iowa Gambling Task in fMRI images , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[41]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Tensor Decompositions and Applications , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[42]  J. Pearce Amygdala , 2008, European Neurology.

[43]  C. Carter,et al.  Reward-related decision-making in pediatric major depressive disorder: an fMRI study. , 2006, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[44]  Rami K. Niazy,et al.  Simultaneous recording of laser-evoked brain potentials and continuous, high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging in humans , 2005, NeuroImage.

[45]  Rami K. Niazy,et al.  Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets , 2005, NeuroImage.

[46]  Jeffrey C. Cooper,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward prediction , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.

[47]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  The Neural Substrates of Reward Processing in Humans: The Modern Role of fMRI , 2004, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[48]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[50]  H. Geurts,et al.  The top and the bottom of ADHD: a neuropsychological perspective , 2003, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[51]  R. Bro,et al.  A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models , 2003 .

[52]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dissociable Neural Responses in Human Reward Systems , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Martin T. Hagan,et al.  Gauss-Newton approximation to Bayesian learning , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'97).

[55]  D. Thomson,et al.  Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[56]  J. J. Moré,et al.  Quasi-Newton Methods, Motivation and Theory , 1974 .

[57]  P. McKenna,et al.  Brain activations associated with anticipation and delivery of monetary reward: A systematic review and meta-analysis of fMRI studies , 2021, PloS one.

[58]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  ICA and IVA for Data Fusion: An Overview and a New Approach Based on Disjoint Subspaces , 2019, IEEE Sensors Letters.

[59]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Tensor decompositions and data fusion in epileptic electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging data , 2017, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[60]  Pierre Comon,et al.  Multimodal approach to estimate the ocular movements during EEG recordings: A coupled tensor factorization method , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).