Excitation and changes in adaptation by stretch of mechanoreceptors

The observation that stretch applied to the skin has a facilitatory action on the 'spontaneous' activity of tactile receptors induced by impulses arriving via sympathetic nerve fibres to the skin or by sympathomimetic substances (Loewenstein, 1956), gave the stimulus for exploring the action of stretch alone on the touch receptor. It appeared also probable that the adequate mechanical stimulus for a tactile receptor excited the ending by stretching it; this being the case, only minute stretching of the ending occurs under physiological conditions of tactile stimulation. It seemed of interest to examine the touch receptor's behaviour over a wider range of skin stretch in the hope of throwing some light on the nature of mechanoreceptive adaptation. A preparation such as the frog's skin, providing a physical system in which two differently adapting mechanoreceptors lying side by side may be simultaneously activated, seemed well suited for this purpose. The frog's skin presents a fastadapting mechanoreceptor, namely the well-known touch receptor, and a slowly adapting ending (Fessard & Segers, 1943a, b; Maruhashi, Mizuguchi & Tasaki, 1952); the latter will be shown in the present work to have the attributes of a stretch receptor. It was found that adaptation of the touch receptor is inifluenced in a marked degree by stretch, so that the ordinarily fast-adapting touch receptor when fully stretched presents a non-adapting stationary discharge like a stretch receptor. The results seem to indicate the existence of a mechanical basis for adaptation.

[1]  J. Malcolm,et al.  The excitation of touch receptors in frog's skin , 1951, Journal of Physiology.

[2]  R. Álvarez-Buylla,et al.  Local responses in Pacinian corpuscles. , 1952, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  PROCESSES OF EXCITATION IN THE DENDRITES AND IN THE SOMA OF SINGLE ISOLATED SENSORY NERVE CELLS OF THE LOBSTER AND CRAYFISH , 1955, The Journal of general physiology.

[4]  I. Tasaki,et al.  Action currents in single afferent nerve fibres elicited by stimulation of the skin of the toad and the cat , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  B. Matthews The response of a single end organ , 1931, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  J. M. Ritchie,et al.  Effects of stretch on single myelinated nerve fibres , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  P.D.W.,et al.  Parkinson's Disease and Its Surgical Treatment , 1954, Neurology.

[8]  D. W. Bronk Fatigue of the sense organs in muscle , 1929, Journal of Physiology.

[9]  M. J. Cohen,et al.  Effect of stretch on conduction in single nerve fibers. , 1950, The Biological Bulletin.

[10]  W. Loewenstein Modulation of cutaneous mechanoreceptors by sympathetic stimulation , 1956, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  B. Katz,et al.  Depolarization of sensory terminals and the initiation of impulses in the muscle spindle , 1950, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  M SATO,et al.  The distribution of myelin on nerve fibres from pacinian corpuscles , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  J. Gray,et al.  Properties of the receptor potential in Pacinian corpuscles , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Y. Zotterman,et al.  Special senses: thermal receptors. , 1953, Annual review of physiology.