Predicting functional responses in agro-ecosystems from animal movement data to improve management of invasive pests.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nathan P. Snow | C. Webb | K. Vercauteren | Jesse S. Lewis | J. Beasley | R. Boughton | R. Brook | Ryan S. Miller | S. Hartley | S. Wisely | K. Pepin | J. Fischer | S. Ditchkoff | J. Kilgo | M. Wilber | L. Holmstrom | Sarah M. Chinn
[1] Jonah Gabry,et al. R-squared for Bayesian Regression Models , 2019, The American Statistician.
[2] David W. Wolfson,et al. Accounting for heterogeneous invasion rates reveals management impacts on the spatial expansion of an invasive species , 2019, Ecosphere.
[3] Nathan P. Snow,et al. Evaluation of movement behaviors to inform toxic baiting strategies for invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa). , 2018, Pest management science.
[4] Jason B Terry,et al. Prevalence and amount of feral swine damage to three row crops at planting , 2018, Crop Protection.
[5] Jessica L. Tegt,et al. Seasonal variation in preference dictates space use in an invasive generalist , 2018, PloS one.
[6] Connor J. Burgin,et al. How many species of mammals are there? , 2018, Journal of Mammalogy.
[7] M. A. Tabak,et al. Abiotic and biotic influences on home-range size of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) , 2018, Journal of Mammalogy.
[8] Nathan P. Snow,et al. Interpreting and predicting the spread of invasive wild pigs , 2017 .
[9] Nathan P. Snow,et al. Attractants for wild pigs: current use, availability, needs, and future potential , 2017, European Journal of Wildlife Research.
[10] Benjamin Rosenbaum,et al. Fitting functional responses: Direct parameter estimation by simulating differential equations , 2017, bioRxiv.
[11] J. Beasley,et al. Ecology and Management of Terrestrial Vertebrate Invasive Species in the United States , 2017 .
[12] K. Vercauteren,et al. Quantifying drivers of wild pig movement across multiple spatial and temporal scales , 2017, Movement ecology.
[13] Nathan P. Snow,et al. Development of toxic bait to control invasive wild pigs and reduce damage , 2017 .
[14] Jesse S. Lewis,et al. Biotic and abiotic factors predicting the global distribution and population density of an invasive large mammal , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[15] P. Landi,et al. Functional responses can’t unify invasion ecology , 2017, Biological Invasions.
[16] Ryan Wasserman,et al. Functional responses can unify invasion ecology , 2017, Biological Invasions.
[17] Brett T. McClintock,et al. Animal Movement: Statistical Models for Telemetry Data , 2017 .
[18] C. Slootmaker,et al. Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states , 2016 .
[19] Adrien Michez,et al. Use of unmanned aerial system to assess wildlife (Sus scrofa) damage to crops (Zea mays) , 2016 .
[20] Derek E. Lee,et al. Foraging habitat selection by California spotted owls after fire , 2016 .
[21] Jacob S. Ivan,et al. A functional model for characterizing long‐distance movement behaviour , 2016 .
[22] Mevin B. Hooten,et al. Basis Function Models for Animal Movement , 2016, 1601.05408.
[23] Josep Peñuelas,et al. Temporal trends in the enhanced vegetation index and spring weather predict seed production in Mediterranean oaks , 2015, Plant Ecology.
[24] M. J. Hatcher,et al. Predicting invasive species impacts: a community module functional response approach reveals context dependencies , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.
[25] D. Maillard,et al. Diet of the Wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) inhabiting the Montpellier garrigue , 2014 .
[26] R. Brook,et al. Feral wild boar distribution and perceptions of risk on the central Canadian prairies , 2014 .
[27] M. Lutman,et al. Consequences Associated with the Recent Range Expansion of Nonnative Feral Swine , 2014 .
[28] S. Ballari,et al. A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges , 2014 .
[29] Anthony Ricciardi,et al. Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach , 2014, Biological Invasions.
[30] Mevin B Hooten,et al. Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. , 2013, Ecology.
[31] A. Amici,et al. Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): the “refuge effect” , 2012, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.
[32] S. Ballari,et al. Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review , 2012, Biological Invasions.
[33] N. Pettorelli,et al. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI): unforeseen successes in animal ecology , 2011 .
[34] R. López‐Lozano,et al. An increase in canopy cover leads to masting in Quercusilex , 2010, Trees.
[35] I. L. Brisbin,et al. WILD PIGS: BIOLOGY, DAMAGE, CONTROL TECHINQUES AND MANAGEMENT , 2009 .
[36] M. S. Mitchell,et al. Territoriality of Feral Pigs in a Highly Persecuted Population on Fort Benning, Georgia , 2009 .
[37] Holger Dettki,et al. Habitat use and spatial patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa (L.): agricultural fields and edges , 2009, European Journal of Wildlife Research.
[38] M. Roth,et al. Commuting, shifting or remaining?: different spatial utilisation patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in forest and field crops during summer. , 2009 .
[39] Atle Mysterud,et al. Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection. , 2009, Ecology.
[40] O. Ovaskainen,et al. State-space models of individual animal movement. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[41] V. Jansen,et al. How population dynamics shape the functional response in a one-predator-two-prey system. , 2007, Ecology.
[42] T. Ruf,et al. Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa: ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers , 2005 .
[43] N. Pettorelli,et al. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[44] R. Byrne,et al. Foraging behaviour in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa): remembering and prioritizing food sites of different value , 2005, Animal Cognition.
[45] Stephen P. Ellner,et al. SCALING UP ANIMAL MOVEMENTS IN HETEROGENEOUS LANDSCAPES: THE IMPORTANCE OF BEHAVIOR , 2002 .
[46] W. M. Lonsdale,et al. GLOBAL PATTERNS OF PLANT INVASIONS AND THE CONCEPT OF INVASIBILITY , 1999 .
[47] R. J. Putman,et al. Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats. , 1998 .
[48] Atle Mysterud,et al. FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES IN HABITAT USE: AVAILABILITY INFLUENCES RELATIVE USE IN TRADE-OFF SITUATIONS , 1998 .
[49] B. Manly,et al. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .
[50] Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al. Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .
[51] Douglas H. Johnson. THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .
[52] Thomas Caraco,et al. ON FORAGING TIME ALLOCATION IN A STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENT , 1980 .
[53] E. Charnov. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.
[54] William W. Murdoch,et al. Switching, Functional Response, and Stability in Predator-Prey Systems , 1975, The American Naturalist.
[55] C. S. Holling. The Components of Predation as Revealed by a Study of Small-Mammal Predation of the European Pine Sawfly , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.
[56] D. Pimental. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC COSTS OF VERTEBRATE SPECIES INVASIONS INTO THE UNITED STATES , 2007 .
[57] P. Vitousek,et al. INTRODUCED SPECIES: A SIGNIFICANT COMPONENT OF HUMAN-CAUSED GLOBAL CHANGE , 1997 .
[58] W. E. Pinchak,et al. Wildlife Damage Management , Internet Center for April 1995 FERAL HOGS IN THE ROLLING PLAINS OF TEXAS : PERSPECTIVES , PROBLEMS , AND POTENTIAL , 2017 .
[59] Robert M. Timm,et al. Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage , 1985 .
[60] W. Murdoch,et al. Predation and Population Stability , 1975 .