User Acceptance of Usable Blockchain-Based Research Data Sharing System: An Extended TAM-Based Study

Blockchain technology has evolved as a promising means to transform data management models in many domains including healthcare, agricultural research, tourism domains etc. In the research community, a usable blockchain-based system can allow users to create a proof of ownership and provenance of the research work, share research data without losing control and ownership of it, provide incentives for sharing and give users full transparency and control over who access their data, when and for what purpose. The initial adoption of such blockchain-based systems is necessary for continued use of the services, but their user acceptance behavioral model has not been well investigated in the literature. In this paper, we take the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a foundation and extend the external constructs to uncover how the perceived ease of use, perceived usability, quality of the system and perceived enjoyment influence the intention to use the blockchain-based system. We based our study on user evaluation of a prototype of a blockchain-based research data sharing framework using a TAM validated questionnaire. Our results show that, overall, all the individual constructs of the behavior model significantly influence the intention to use the system while their collective effect is found to be insignificant. The quality of the system and the perceived enjoyment have stronger influence on the perceived usefulness. However, the effect of perceived ease of use on the perceived usefulness is not supported. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings.

[1]  Roberto Baldoni,et al.  A Prototype Evaluation of a Tamper-Resistant High Performance Blockchain-Based Transaction Log for a Distributed Database , 2017, 2017 13th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC).

[2]  Andrew Lippman,et al.  A Case Study for Blockchain in Healthcare : “ MedRec ” prototype for electronic health records and medical research data , 2016 .

[3]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[4]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[5]  Meng Chang Chen,et al.  Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Disrupting Industries with Blockchain: The Industry, Venture Capital Funding, and Regional Distribution of Blockchain Ventures , 2018, HICSS.

[7]  Feng Tian,et al.  An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology , 2016, 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM).

[8]  Y. Liou,et al.  Adolescent health promotion scale: development and psychometric testing. , 2003, Public health nursing.

[9]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[10]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  A Model for Mandatory Use of Software Technologies: An Integrative Approach by Applying Multiple Levels of Abstraction of Informing Science , 2010 .

[11]  Vassilis Moustakis,et al.  Modeling the acceptance of clinical information systems among hospital medical staff: An extended TAM model , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[12]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal Data , 2015, 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops.

[13]  Zhu Han,et al.  Performance Analysis and Application of Mobile Blockchain , 2017, 2018 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).

[14]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[16]  J. Tirole,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 2003 .

[17]  Ellis Solaiman,et al.  On and Off-Blockchain Enforcement Of Smart Contracts , 2018, Euro-Par Workshops.

[18]  David L DeMets,et al.  Incentives for Clinical Trialists to Share Data. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation , 1985 .

[20]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  User Data Sharing Frameworks: A Blockchain-Based Incentive Solution , 2019, 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON).

[21]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  User-Controlled Privacy-Preserving User Profile Data Sharing based on Blockchain , 2019, ArXiv.

[22]  A. P. Rovai A constructivist approach to online college learning , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[23]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[24]  Andrew Lippman,et al.  MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management , 2016, 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD).

[25]  Angus Whyte,et al.  Open Science in Practice: Researcher Perspectives and Participation , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[26]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[27]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Blockchain-Based Research Data Sharing Framework for Incentivizing the Data Owners , 2018, ICBC.

[29]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Bitcoin Blockchain Transactions Visualization , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Cloud Computing, Big Data and Blockchain (ICCBB).

[30]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[31]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Towards decentralized data storage in general cloud platform for meta-products , 2016, BDAW '16.