Low latency IP mobility management: protocol and analysis

Mobile IP is one of the dominating protocols that enable a mobile node to remain reachable while moving around in the Internet. However, it suffers from long handoff latency and route inefficiency. In this article, we present a novel distributed mobility management architecture, ADA (Asymmetric Double-Agents), which introduces double mobility agents to serve one end-to-end communication. One mobility agent is located close to the MN and the other close to the CN. ADA can achieve both low handoff latency and low transmission latency, which is crucial for improvement of user perceived QoS. It also provides an easy-to-use mechanism for MNs to manage and control each traffic session with a different policy and provide specific QoS support. We apply ADA to MIPv6 communications and present a detailed protocol design. Subsequently, we propose an analytical framework for systematic and thorough performance evaluation of mobile IP-based mobility management protocols. Equipped with this model, we analyze the handoff latency, single interaction delay and total time cost under the bidirectional tunneling mode and the route optimization mode for MIPv6, HMIPv6, CNLP, and ADA. Through both quantitative analysis and NS2-based simulations, we show that ADA significantly outperforms the existing mobility management protocols.

[1]  Thomas F. La Porta,et al.  HAWAII: a domain-based approach for supporting mobility in wide-area wireless networks , 2002, Proceedings. Seventh International Conference on Network Protocols.

[2]  Ahmed H. Zahran,et al.  Signal threshold adaptation for vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks , 2006, Mob. Networks Appl..

[3]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  HMIPv6: A hierarchical mobile IPv6 proposal , 2000, MOCO.

[4]  V. Umesh,et al.  Mobility Management Approaches for Mobile IP Networks: Performance Comparison and Use Recommendations , 2013 .

[5]  James Kempf,et al.  Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping in Split Scenario , 2007, RFC.

[6]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Route Optimization for Mobile IP , 1998, Cluster Computing.

[7]  James Kempf,et al.  Scalability and robustness analysis of mobile IPv6, fast mobile IPv6, hierarchical mobile IPv6, and hybrid IPv6 mobility protocols using a large-scale simulation , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[8]  Heeyoung Jung,et al.  A Scheme for Supporting Fast Handover in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Networks , 2005 .

[9]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A survey of mobility management in next-generation all-IP-based wireless systems , 2004, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[10]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  A Study on Performance of Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 in IP-Based Cellular Networks , 2004 .

[11]  A. G. Valko,et al.  A New Approach to Internet Host Mobility , 1999 .

[12]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  IDMP-based fast handoffs and paging in IP-based 4G mobile networks , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[13]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  Performance Analysis of Fast Handover in Mobile IPv6 Networks , 2003, PWC.

[14]  Ping Pan,et al.  Internet Engineering Task Force , 1995 .

[15]  Jonathan M. Smith,et al.  DHARMA: distributed home agent for robust mobile access , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[16]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[17]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  A performance comparison of Mobile IPv6, Hierarchical Mobile IPv6, fast handovers for Mobile IPv6 and their combination , 2003, MOCO.

[18]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4 , 2002, RFC.

[19]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A New Scheme for Reducing Link and Signaling Costs in Mobile IP , 2003, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[20]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) Mobility Management , 2008, RFC.

[21]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A distributed dynamic regional location management scheme for Mobile IP , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[22]  Kilian Weniger,et al.  MIPv6 Correspondent Node-Targeted Location Privacy and Optimized Routing , 2008 .

[23]  Rajeev Koodli Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers , 2009, RFC.

[24]  Samuel Pierre,et al.  An Analytical Framework for Performance Evaluation of IPv6-Based mobility Management Protocols , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[25]  András Gergely Valkó,et al.  Cellular IP: a new approach to Internet host mobility , 1999, CCRV.

[26]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobile IPv4 Regional Registration , 2004, RFC.

[27]  Jiannong Cao,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of an improved mobile IP protocol , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[28]  Rong Zheng,et al.  A case for mobility support with temporary home agents , 2002, MOCO.

[29]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Dynamic hierarchical mobility management strategy for mobile IP networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.