Attributions of Power Across a Social Network

This paper examines the relationship between individual and structural explanations of attributions of power across two domains: administrative decisions and technical decisions. An assessment is made of the relative importance of member level variates against contextual variates as determinants of perceived power. The results suggest that contextual effects are far stronger than member level variates. Among member level characteristics, an incumbent's formal status is found to be a primary determinant of his perceived administrative power, while his expertise is a better predictor of his perceived technical power. The formal structure outweighs the interaction network as a context for understanding attributions of power.

[1]  Peter B. Doeringer,et al.  Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis , 2020 .

[2]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[3]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[4]  L. Erbring,et al.  Individuals and Social Structure , 1979 .

[5]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  New Directions in Organizational Behavior , 1976 .

[6]  George Farkas,et al.  Specification, Residuals and Contextual Effects , 1974 .

[7]  J. Pennings,et al.  A Strategic Contingencies' Theory of Intraorganizational Power , 1971 .

[8]  R. Hauser,et al.  Allen Barton Comments on Hauser's "Context and Consex" , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Robert M. Hauser,et al.  Context and Consex: A Cautionary Tale , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  A. Tannenbaum Control in Organizations , 1969 .

[11]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .

[12]  S. C. Johnson Hierarchical clustering schemes , 1967, Psychometrika.

[13]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[14]  R. Ritti,et al.  Professionalization as Career Immobility , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  E. Campbell,et al.  Structural Effects and Interpersonal Relationships , 1965, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  David Mechanic,et al.  Sources of Power of Lower Participants in Complex Organizations , 1962 .

[17]  A. Tannenbaum Control in Organizations: Individual Adjustment and Organizational Performance , 1962 .

[18]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  Complex organizations : a sociological reader , 1961 .

[19]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Studies in Social Power. , 1960 .

[20]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[21]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[22]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[23]  Craig C. Lundberg,et al.  Power and politics in organizations , 1980 .

[24]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[25]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Ambiguity of Leadership , 1977 .

[26]  A. Pettigrew The politics of organizational decision-making , 1973 .

[27]  C. Perrow Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View , 1970 .

[28]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[29]  M. Crozier The Bureaucratic Phenomenon , 1964 .