Isolating the Determinants of Innovativeness: A Split-Population Tobit (SPOT) Duration Model of Timing and Volume of First and Repeat Purchase

The authors present the Split-Population Tobit (SPOT) duration model to incorporate two conceptually distinct dimensions of innovativeness in a single framework, namely, the timing and volume of adoption. Rather than utilizing a diffusion model specification based on word-of-mouth and social contagion effects, the present approach uses a growth model specification and delineates a general function of time to describe the distribution of adoption timing. Estimation and several validation exercises performed on a data set describing the diffusion of personal computers across a sample of over 3000 U.S. firms provide strong support for the superiority of the SPOT model over models derived from restricted conceptualizations of innovativeness. The empirical work, albeit modest, tests the impact of covariates, such as firm-size and decision-centralization, on the dimensions of innovativeness and sheds light on some inconsistent findings in the innovation adoption literature. The authors subsequently derive the extended SPOT model (EXT-SPOT) to incorporate repeat purchase volume and timing in the SPOT framework. Finally, they discuss limitations, further research directions, and implications for the practitioner.

[1]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[2]  V. Govindarajan.  A Contingency Approach to Strategy Implementation at the Business-Unit Level: Integrating Administrative Mechanisms with Strategy , 1988 .

[3]  Seungmook Choi,et al.  A product diffusion model incorporating repeat purchases , 1985 .

[4]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[5]  P. Joskow,et al.  The Diffusion of New Technologies: Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry , 1988 .

[6]  R. Pollak,et al.  The likelihood dominance criterion: A new approach to model selection , 1991 .

[7]  John B. Meisel,et al.  A dynamic analysis of the adoption of a new technology: the case of optical scanners , 1987 .

[8]  F. Bass.  A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[9]  Siva Balasubramanian,et al.  Long-Term Forecasting with Innovation Diffusion Models: The Impact of Replacement Purchases , 1986 .

[10]  Rajiv K. Sinha,et al.  A Split Hazard Model for Analyzing the Diffusion of Innovations , 1992 .

[11]  Yoram Wind,et al.  Organizational Psychographics and Innovativeness , 1980 .

[12]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Marketing's Role in the Implementation of Business Strategies: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework , 1987 .

[13]  G. Maddala.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[14]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Conceptual issues in the study of innovation , 1976 .

[15]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion , 1986 .

[16]  D. G. Morrison.  On the Interpretation of Discriminant Analysis , 1969 .

[17]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[18]  J. Baldridge,et al.  Organizational Innovation: Individual, Organizational, and Environmental Impacts. , 1975 .

[19]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[20]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Determination of Adopter Categories by Using Innovation Diffusion Models , 1990 .

[21]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  The Use of Computers in Hospitals: An Analysis of Adopters and Nonadopters , 1977 .

[22]  J. Heckman,et al.  Econometric duration analysis , 1984 .

[23]  G. Lilien,et al.  Marketing Decision Making: A Model Building Approach , 1984 .

[24]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects , 1989 .

[25]  S. H. Star,et al.  Advanced Marketing Strategy : Phenomena, Analysis and Decisions , 1991 .

[26]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogeneous Population: A Micromodeling Approach , 1990 .

[27]  R. Prentice,et al.  Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer data. , 1978, Biometrics.

[28]  F. Bass,et al.  A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products , 1987 .