Efficient low-dose CT artifact mitigation using an artifact-matched prior scan.

PURPOSE Low-dose CT has attracted increasing attention due to growing concerns about radiation exposure in medical scans. However, the frugal use of x-ray radiation inevitably reduces the quality of the CT images, introducing artifacts such as noise and streaks which make the reconstructed images difficult to read in clinical routine. For follow-up CT exams a prior scan is often available. It typically contains the same anatomical structures, just somewhat deformed and not aligned. This work describes a two-step technique that utilizes this prior scan to achieve high-quality low-dose CT imaging, overcoming difficulties arising from noise artifacts and misalignment. We specifically focus on reducing the dose by lowering the number of projections. This gives rise to severe streak artifacts which possibly lower the readability of CT images to a larger extent than the fine-grained noise that results from lowering the mA or kV settings. METHODS A common approach is to apply image filtering to reduce the noise artifacts. These techniques typically utilize pixel neighborhoods in the degraded image to estimate the true value of a pixel at the center of this neighborhood. However, this can lead to poor results when the image is severely contaminated under very low low-dose situations. We propose a method that utilizes the nondegraded, clean prior to determine higher quality pixel statistics to form the pixel estimates, supported by the matching scheme of the non-local means filter. To make this matching reliable, a good registration of prior and low-dose image is required. For this, we employ a state-of-the-art registration method, called SIFT-flow, which can tolerate the high amount of streak noise. But even for properly registered images, using an artifact free prior for the matching yields inferior results. We hence describe a scheme that first constructs a tandem-prior with streak artifacts resembling those in the low-dose image, and then employs this image for the matching, but uses the corresponding high-quality prior to determine the pixel estimates. RESULTS Two experimental studies are carried out, using a head phantom and a human lung with projections gathered via simulation. We assess the quality of the processed reconstruction with various metrics: mathematical and perceptual. We find that the quality that can be obtained with the artifact-matched prior-based scheme significantly exceeds that of all competing schemes. Even though the general prior-based approach is able to eliminate the streak artifacts, only the artifact-matched scheme can restore small detail and feature sharpness. CONCLUSIONS The reduced-projection low-dose image reconstruction algorithm we present outperforms traditional image restoration algorithms when a prior scan is available. Our method is quite efficient and as such it is well suited for fast-paced clinical applications such as image-assisted interventions, orthopedic alignment scans, and follow-ups.

[1]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[2]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[3]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Evaluation of sparse-view reconstruction from flat-panel-detector cone-beam CT , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  E. Sidky,et al.  Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  F. Natterer The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography , 1986 .

[8]  P. Gilbert Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Mythreyi Bhargavan,et al.  MEDICAL RADIATION EXPOSURE IN THE U.S. IN 2006: PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 2008, Health physics.

[10]  Hengyong Yu,et al.  A soft-threshold filtering approach for reconstruction from a limited number of projections , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Bradley James Erickson,et al.  Optimizing non-local means for denoising low dose CT , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[12]  Klaus Mueller,et al.  Evaluating popular non-linear image processing filters for their use in regularized iterative CT , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[13]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey , 2011, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[14]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Ultra-low dose lung CT perfusion regularized by a previous scan. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[15]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  SIFT Flow: Dense Correspondence across Scenes and Its Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  G. Herman,et al.  Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  A. Kak,et al.  Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm , 1984, Ultrasonic imaging.

[19]  Klaus Mueller,et al.  Learning Effective Parameter Settings for Iterative CT Reconstruction Algorithms , 2009 .

[20]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  Low-dose computed tomography image restoration using previous normal-dose scan. , 2011, Medical physics.

[21]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[22]  E. W. Shrigley Medical Physics , 1944, British medical journal.

[23]  Klaus Mueller,et al.  Performance Tuning for CUDA-Accelerated Neighborhood Denoising Filters , 2011 .

[24]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[25]  Klaus Mueller,et al.  IOP PUBLISHING PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY , 2007 .

[26]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  A Fast 3-D Medical Image Registration Algorithm Based on Equivalent Meridian Plane , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[27]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .