论文信息 - A Pragma-dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion

A Pragma-dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion

According to the pragma-dialectical ideal of reasonableness, in case of a difference of opinion the protagonist and the antagonist of a standpoint should attempt to find out by means of a critical discussion whether the protagonist's standpoint is capable of withstanding the antagonist's criticism. In this paper, the authors formulate the latest version of their basic rules for the performance of speech acts in the various stages that can beanalytically distinguished in a critical discussion that can lead to the resolution of a single and non-mixed difference opinion.

Rob Grootendorst | Frans H. van Eemeren | F. H. Eemeren | R. Grootendorst

[1] Rob Grootendorst,et al. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: Contents , 2003 .

[2] F. H. Eemeren,et al. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective , 1992 .

[3] Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al. From axiom to dialogue , 1982 .

[4] S. Jackson,et al. Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse , 1993 .

[5] Frans H. van Eemeren,et al. Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[6] F. H. Eemeren,et al. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach , 2003 .

[7] F. H. Eemeren,et al. Speech acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion (vertaling in het Russisch) , 1984 .

[8] F. V. Eemeren. A systematic theory of argumentation , 2004 .

[9] Frans H. van Eemeren,et al. A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.