Environmental enrichment improves mating success in fruit flies

Environmental enrichment, defined as housing conditions that include a combination of complex inanimate and social stimulation, has strong positive effects on brain and behaviour in various species. We extended previous studies to evaluate how enrichment affects mating success. In a series of experiments, we found that male fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, reared in an enriched environment were twice as successful in acquiring mates as were males from standard rearing conditions. The dominant factor increasing mating success was the larger space available per fly. Flies from enriched and standard environments showed no significant behavioural differences, leading us to suggest that different social environments at high and low per capita spaces are associated, on average, with either subtle behavioural differences or distinct pheromonal profiles to which females are sensitive while choosing mates.

[1]  D. Tautz,et al.  Patterns of Speciation , 2004 .

[2]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Fighting fruit flies: A model system for the study of aggression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Y. Kidokoro,et al.  Aggressive behaviours of female Drosophila melanogaster are influenced by their social experience and food resources , 2002 .

[4]  Gene E. Robinson,et al.  Experience- and Age-Related Outgrowth of Intrinsic Neurons in the Mushroom Bodies of the Adult Worker Honeybee , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  H. Würbel Ideal homes? Housing effects on rodent brain and behaviour , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  C. Strambi,et al.  Influence of environmental stimulation on neurogenesis in the adult insect brain. , 2000, Journal of neurobiology.

[7]  D. Lockhart,et al.  Effects of environmental enrichment on gene expression in the brain. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  E. Nevo,et al.  Nonrandom mating in Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations derived from closely adjacent ecologically contrasting slopes at "Evolution Canyon". , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  E. Jakob,et al.  Rearing environment affects behaviour of jumping spiders , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  L. Ehrman,et al.  Developmental Isolation and Subsequent Adult Behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. V. Survey of Six Sibling Species , 1999 .

[11]  T. Robinson,et al.  Brain Plasticity and Behavior , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  L. Ehrman,et al.  Developmental Isolation and Subsequent Adult Behavior of Drosophila paulistorum.IV. Courtship , 1998, Behavior genetics.

[13]  Jeffrey R. Powell,et al.  Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology: The Drosophila Model , 1997 .

[14]  M Heisenberg,et al.  Vision affects mushroom bodies and central complex in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[15]  I A Meinertzhagen,et al.  Experience-Dependent Developmental Plasticity in the Optic Lobe of Drosophila melanogaster , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Rearing in different light regimes affects courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  D. H. Edwards,et al.  The Effect of Social Experience on Serotonergic Modulation of the Escape Circuit of Crayfish , 1996, Science.

[18]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Early visual experience affects mate choice of Drosophila melanogaster , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  A. J. Moore,et al.  Conditional signalling strategies: effects of ontogeny, social experience and social status on the pheromonal signal of male cockroaches , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  M Heisenberg,et al.  Structural plasticity in the Drosophila brain , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  L Tompkins,et al.  The flexible fly: experience-dependent development of complex behaviors in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  W. Rice,et al.  LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS? , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Territoriality in Drosophila melanogaster as a conditional strategy , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Michael Ashburner,et al.  Drosophila: A laboratory handbook , 1990 .

[25]  H. A. Orr,et al.  PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  Peter Knoppien Rare-male mating advantage: An artifact caused by differential storage conditions? , 1987, Behavior genetics.

[27]  B. Burnet,et al.  Courtship Behaviour in the Melanogaster Species Sub-Group of Drosophila , 1985 .

[28]  H. L. Carson,et al.  The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila , 1976, Heredity.

[29]  S. Kessler,et al.  Differential posteclosion housing experiences and reproduction in Drosophila , 1975, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  F. Volkmar,et al.  Pattern of dendritic branching in occipital cortex of rats reared in complex environments. , 1973, Experimental neurology.

[31]  M. Rosenzweig Environmental complexity, cerebral change, and behavior. , 1966, The American psychologist.