Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure

Abstract Drawing on the ambidexterity and organizational design theoretical lenses this article analyzes the interplay between R&D team structure, firm’s Information Technology (IT) processes deployment and innovation outcomes. The evidence presented herein upholds the importance of IT and R&D team structure for strategic decisions and to better exploiting firm’s innovation capabilities. Concretely, we argue that R&D team structure (centralized vs formalized vs autonomous) moderates the relationship between IT processes and innovation because it influences the way in which IT is utilized. Considering these facts, we focus on a specific type of innovation, Product-Service Innovation (PSI), largely underexplored despite being increasingly important in modern manufacturing companies. PSI differs from other technological innovations in that it involves continuous engagement with customers and logistics. Through estimation of a Multiple-Indicators Multiple-Causes (MIMIC) model with a unique sample of 352 Manufacturing Multinational Enterprises (MMNEs), we find that customer and logistics IT processes are positively linked to higher levels of PSI and that, as hypothesized, service R&D team structure moderates this relationship. In firms with autonomous R&D teams, customer-based IT processes lead to higher PSI levels, whereas in firms with formalized R&D teams, logistics-based IT processes is conducive to higher PSI levels. IT processes are not an input of PSI in centralized service R&D teams.

[1]  R. Cooper,et al.  An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact , 1986 .

[2]  Len Holden,et al.  Dynamics of Central Control and Subsidiary Autonomy in the Management of Human Resources: Case-Study Evidence from US MNCs in the UK , 2004 .

[3]  K. Storbacka A solution business model: Capabilities and management practices for integrated solutions , 2011 .

[4]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Catalyst Organizations as a New Organization Design for Innovation: The Case of Hyperloop Transportation Technologies , 2018, Academy of Management Discoveries.

[5]  R. Mudambi Hierarchy, coordination, and innovation in the multinational enterprise , 2011 .

[6]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[7]  Maria Rosaria Della Peruta,et al.  The impact of IT-based knowledge management systems on internal venturing and innovation: a structural equation modeling approach to corporate performance , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[10]  D. Prajogo The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance , 2016 .

[11]  J. Hage,et al.  Program Change and Organizational Properties a Comparative Analysis , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  B. Looy,et al.  Servitization: Disentangling the Impact of Service Business Model Innovation on Manufacturing Firm Performance , 2013 .

[13]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness , 2017 .

[14]  Carla Albuquerque de Oliveira,et al.  Conceptualizing and measuring the “strategy execution” construct , 2019 .

[15]  Sengun Yeniyurt,et al.  Establishing rigor in mail-survey procedures in international business research , 2015 .

[16]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[17]  Javier Cenamor,et al.  Adopting a platform approach in servitization : Leveraging the value of digitalization , 2017 .

[18]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Advanced manufacturing systems: socialization characteristics and trends , 2017, J. Intell. Manuf..

[19]  Jeongdoo Park,et al.  Common method bias in hospitality research: A critical review of literature and an empirical study , 2016 .

[20]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[21]  Joan Torrent-Sellens,et al.  ICT, innovation, and firm productivity: New evidence from small local firms , 2015 .

[22]  Tim Baines,et al.  Service implementation in manufacturing: An organisational transformation perspective , 2017 .

[23]  Hamid Noori,et al.  Strategizing niceness in co-opetition: The case of knowledge exchange in supply chain innovation projects , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Servitisation and value co-production in the UK music industry: An empirical study of Consumer Attitudes , 2012 .

[25]  Ronald Mora Esquivel,et al.  Cultura organizativa e innovación: un análisis temático en empresas de Costa Rica , 2015 .

[26]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Ambidexterity Under Scrutiny: Exploration and Exploitation Via Internal Organization, Alliances, and Acquisitions , 2014 .

[27]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies , 2012 .

[28]  Shivam Gupta,et al.  Compliance, network, security and the people related factors in cloud ERP implementation , 2016, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[29]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Talent for services: How gaining access to talent enables successful servitization , 2018, Research Handbook of International Talent Management.

[30]  S. F. Cohn,et al.  Organizational structure, decision-making procedures, and the adoption of innovations , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[31]  S. Vandermerwe,et al.  Servitization of business : Adding value by adding services , 1988 .

[32]  Rogelio Oliva,et al.  Managing the transition from products to services , 2003, International Journal of Service Industry Management.

[33]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Unpacking the effect of strategic ambidexterity on performance: A cross-country comparison of MMNEs developing product-service innovation , 2019 .

[34]  V. Parida,et al.  Interactive Effects of Network Capability, ICT Capability, and Financial Slack on Technology‐Based Small Firm Innovation Performance , 2015 .

[35]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Product–Service Innovation and Performance: The Role of Collaborative Partnerships and R&D Intensity , 2019 .

[36]  Marja Toivonen,et al.  Organizing customer-oriented service business in manufacturing , 2011 .

[37]  Laura B. Cardinal Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development , 2001 .

[38]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  A Tale of Three Perspectives , 2009 .

[39]  Bodo B. Schlegelmilch,et al.  The Use of International R&D Teams - An Empirical Investigation of Selected Contingency Factors , 2004 .

[40]  J. Wincent,et al.  Developing Global Service Innovation Capabilities: How Global Manufacturers Address the Challenges of Market Heterogeneity , 2015 .

[41]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Opening Up: How Centralization Affects Participation and Inclusion in Strategy Making , 2017 .

[42]  Estimating Desired Sample Size for Simple Random Sampling of a Skewed Population , 2018 .

[43]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Integrative Capabilities, Vertical Integration, and Innovation Over Successive Technology Lifecycles , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Bruno Cassiman,et al.  Innovation, exports and productivity , 2010 .

[45]  Thomas Neubauer,et al.  An empirical study about the status of business process management , 2009, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[46]  John Joseph,et al.  Organizational Structure and Performance Feedback: Centralization, Aspirations and Termination Decisions , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Nicholas W. Jankowski,et al.  Conducting Online Surveys , 2006 .

[48]  Bongsik Shin,et al.  Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[49]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Cloud-enabled real-time platform for adaptive planning and control in auction logistics center , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[50]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Scaling: Organizing and Growth in Entrepreneurial Ventures , 2017 .

[51]  Pengcheng Zhang,et al.  Centralization and innovation performance in an emerging economy: testing the moderating effects , 2015 .

[52]  Liang-Hung Lin,et al.  Organizational Structure and Acculturation in Acquisitions , 2014 .

[53]  K. Misulis,et al.  Researchers , 2018, Essentials of Clinical Informatics.

[54]  Abbas Tarhini,et al.  The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[55]  S. Kraus,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation in vertical alliances: joint product innovation and learning from allies , 2016 .

[56]  Cristina Bayona-Sáez,et al.  Organizational innovation, internal R&D and externally sourced innovation practices: Effects on technological innovation outcomes , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[57]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Effect of Knowledge-Sharing Trajectories on Innovative Outcomes in Temporary Online Crowds , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Product-service innovation and performance: Unveiling the complexities , 2018 .

[59]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Measurement and Meaning in Information Systems and Organizational Research: Methodological and Philosophical Foundations , 2011, MIS Q..

[60]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[61]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  IBM's service journey: A summary sketch , 2017 .

[62]  Yipeng Liu,et al.  Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention , 2016 .

[63]  R. Boutellier,et al.  Organizing global R&D: challenges and dilemmas , 2004 .

[64]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Uncovering the role of cross-border strategic alliances and expertise decision centralization in enhancing product-service innovation in MMNEs , 2018, International Business Review.

[65]  Y. Vaillant,et al.  Sustainable and Traditional Product Innovation without Scale and Experience, but Only for KIBS! , 2018 .

[66]  Vanesa Barrales�?Molina,et al.  Explaining the Causes and Effects of Dynamic Capabilities Generation: A Multiple‐Indicator Multiple‐Cause Modelling Approach , 2013 .

[67]  D. Urbig,et al.  Too much or too little of R&D offshoring: The impact of captive offshoring and contract offshoring on innovation performance , 2017 .

[68]  Patrick M. Kreiser,et al.  Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation , 2015 .

[69]  Veronica Soebarto,et al.  Smart steel: new paradigms for the reuse of steel enabled by digital tracking and modelling , 2015 .

[70]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Organizing for servitization: examining front- and back-end design , 2018 .

[71]  Ester Martínez Ros,et al.  Revisiting product and process innovations , 2019, International Journal of Business Environment.

[72]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  E-business, organizational innovation and firm performance in manufacturing SMEs: an empirical study in Spain , 2015 .

[73]  A. Neely,et al.  Why Do Servitized Firms Fail? A Risk-Based Explanation , 2015 .

[74]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Business process maturity models: a systematic literature review , 2016 .

[75]  Frank Wiengarten,et al.  Paths to service capability development for servitization: Examining an internal service ecosystem , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[76]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  External Knowledge and Information Technology: Implications for Process Innovation Performance , 2017, MIS Q..

[77]  Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki,et al.  Translation in cross-language international business research: Beyond equivalence , 2014 .

[78]  P. Matthyssens,et al.  Boosting servitization through digitization: Pathways and dynamic resource configurations for manufacturers , 2017 .

[79]  T. Papadopoulos,et al.  Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach , 2016 .

[80]  J. Miner Organizational Behavior 1: Essential Theories of Motivation and Leadership , 2005 .

[81]  Ying Liao,et al.  Knowledge acquisition and product innovation flexibility in SMEs , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[82]  Saara Brax,et al.  Meta-model of servitization: The integrative profiling approach , 2017 .

[83]  Mark L. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  Understanding Work and Knowledge Management from a Knowledge-in-Practice Perspective , 2013 .

[84]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Uncovering Productivity Gains of Digital and Green Servitization: Implications from the Automotive Industry , 2018 .

[85]  Helena Forslund,et al.  ERP systems' capabilities for supply chain performance management , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[86]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Servitization: revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities , 2017 .

[87]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications , 2016 .

[88]  A. Neely Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing , 2008 .

[89]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World , 2017, MIS Q..

[90]  Jakki J. Mohr,et al.  Radical Product Innovation Capability: Literature Review, Synthesis, and Illustrative Research Propositions , 2014 .

[91]  Christie M. Fuller,et al.  Marker Variable Choice, Reporting, and Interpretation in the Detection of Common Method Variance , 2015 .

[92]  Rogelio Oliva,et al.  Separate or Integrate? Assessing the Impact of Separation Between Product and Service Business on Service Performance in Product Manufacturing Firms , 2011, Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing.

[93]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Towards a “theoretical toolbox” for strategic sourcing , 2009 .

[94]  M. Taisch,et al.  The value of Big Data in servitization , 2015 .

[95]  Tim Baines,et al.  Network positioning and risk perception in servitization: evidence from the UK road transport industry , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[96]  Marko Kohtamäki,et al.  Strategy map of servitization , 2017 .

[97]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[98]  Nina Helander,et al.  Servitization in global business-to-business distribution: The central activities of manufacturers , 2017 .

[99]  Marco Paiola,et al.  A capability perspective on service business development in small and medium-sized suppliers , 2012 .

[100]  Arjen van Witteloostuijn,et al.  From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research , 2010 .

[101]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Interfirm IT Capability Profiles and Communications for Cocreating Relational Value: Evidence from the Logistics Industry , 2012, MIS Q..

[102]  Fariborz Damanpour,et al.  Footnotes to Research on Management Innovation , 2014 .

[103]  Leif Jarle Gressgård,et al.  Knowledge exchange and learning from failures in distributed environments: The role of contractor relationship management and work characteristics , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[104]  Zhiheng Zhao,et al.  Location Management of Cloud Forklifts in Finished Product Warehouse , 2017, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[105]  Naomi B. Robbins,et al.  Design of Diverging Stacked Bar Charts for Likert Scales and Other Applications , 2014 .

[106]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: a global view , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[107]  Pennie Frow,et al.  The role of multichannel integration in customer relationship management , 2004 .

[108]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[109]  J. Eggers Reversing course: Competing technologies, mistakes, and renewal in flat panel displays: Competing Technologies and Renewal in Flat Panel Displays , 2016 .

[110]  Marc Gruber,et al.  R&D Team Diversity and Performance in Hypercompetitive Environments , 2017 .

[111]  Giovanni Perrone,et al.  Network embeddedness and new product development in the biopharmaceutical industry: The moderating role of open innovation flow , 2015 .

[112]  Euripidis Loukis,et al.  The effect of soft ICT capital on innovation performance of Greek firms , 2013, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[113]  M. Johnsson Innovation Enablers for Innovation Teams - A Review , 2017 .

[114]  Nianxin Wang,et al.  Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..