From mirror neurons to joint actions

The discovery of mirror neurons has given rise to a number of interpretations of their functions together with speculations on their potential role in the evolution of specifically human capacities. Thus, mirror neurons have been thought to ground many aspects of human social cognition, including the capacity to engage in cooperative collective actions and to understand them. We propose an evaluation of this latter claim. On the one hand, we will argue that mirror neurons do not by themselves provide a sufficient basis for the forms of agentive understanding and shared intentionality involved in cooperative collective actions. On the other hand, we will also argue that mirror neurons can nevertheless play an important role in an account of the production and understanding of joint action, insofar as they provide the basic constituents of implicit agent-neutral representations and are useful elements in a process of online mutual adjustment of participants' actions.

[1]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  The mirror system in humans , 2002 .

[2]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Agency, simulation and self-identification , 2004 .

[3]  Daniel J Povinelli,et al.  Young and juvenile chimpanzees' (Pan troglodytes) reactions to intentional versus accidental and inadvertent actions , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[4]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography , 1994, Nature.

[5]  D. Perrett A Cellular Basis for Reading Minds from Faces and Actions , 1999 .

[6]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Is human imitation based on a mirror-neurone system? Some behavioural evidence , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  J. Decety,et al.  Top down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a pet investigation. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  M. Arbib,et al.  Language within our grasp , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  J. Stevenson The cultural origins of human cognition , 2001 .

[12]  J. Searle Consciousness and Language: Collective Intentions and Actions , 2002 .

[13]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Collective Intentions and Actions , 2003 .

[14]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  The neural correlates of action understanding in non-human primates , 2002 .

[15]  V. Gallese The ‘‘shared manifold’’ hypothesis: from mirror neurons to empathy , 2001 .

[16]  M. Arbib The mirror system, imitation, and the evolution of language , 2002 .

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Shared Cooperative Activity , 1991 .

[19]  V. Gallese The Roots of Empathy: The Shared Manifold Hypothesis and the Neural Basis of Intersubjectivity , 2003, Psychopathology.

[20]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication , 1991, CL.

[22]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Beyond Consciousness of External Reality: A “Who” System for Consciousness of Action and Self-Consciousness , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[23]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 1988, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  M. Litch,et al.  On Explaining Behavior , 2000 .

[26]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language , 2002 .

[28]  V. Gallese The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  J. Perry The Problem Of The Essential Indexical , 1979 .

[30]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Imitation in Animals and Artifacts , 2002 .

[31]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition , 2001 .

[32]  V. Gallese,et al.  The mirror matching system: A shared manifold for intersubjectivity , 2001 .

[33]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[34]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Audiovisual mirror neurons and action recognition , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  D I Perrett,et al.  Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions. , 1989, The Journal of experimental biology.

[37]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  The Mirror System, Imitation, and the Evolution of Language , 1999 .

[38]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  The mirror system and joint action , 2002 .

[39]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  The Evolving Mirror System: A Neural Basis for Language Readiness , 2003 .

[40]  R. Passingham,et al.  Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Hearing Sounds, Understanding Actions: Action Representation in Mirror Neurons , 2002, Science.

[42]  H. Wellman,et al.  Children Talk About the Mind , 1995 .