Monte Carlo treatment planning for molecular targeted radiotherapy within the MINERVA system

The aim of this project is to extend accurate and patient-specific treatment planning to new treatment modalities, such as molecular targeted radiation therapy, incorporating previously crafted and proven Monte Carlo and deterministic computation methods. A flexible software environment is being created that allows planning radiation treatment for these new modalities and combining different forms of radiation treatment with consideration of biological effects. The system uses common input interfaces, medical image sets for definition of patient geometry and dose reporting protocols. Previously, the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), Montana State University (MSU) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) had accrued experience in the development and application of Monte Carlo based, three-dimensional, computational dosimetry and treatment planning tools for radiotherapy in several specialized areas. In particular, INEEL and MSU have developed computational dosimetry systems for neutron radiotherapy and neutron capture therapy, while LLNL has developed the PEREGRINE computational system for external beam photon-electron therapy. Building on that experience, the INEEL and MSU are developing the MINERVA (modality inclusive environment for radiotherapeutic variable analysis) software system as a general framework for computational dosimetry and treatment planning for a variety of emerging forms of radiotherapy. In collaboration with this development, LLNL has extended its PEREGRINE code to accommodate internal sources for molecular targeted radiotherapy (MTR), and has interfaced it with the plugin architecture of MINERVA. Results from the extended PEREGRINE code have been compared to published data from other codes, and found to be in general agreement (EGS4-2%, MCNP-10%) (Descalle et al 2003 Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 18 71-9). The code is currently being benchmarked against experimental data. The interpatient variability of the drug pharmacokinetics in MTR can only be properly accounted for by image-based, patient-specific treatment planning, as has been common in external beam radiation therapy for many years. MINERVA offers 3D Monte Carlo-based MTR treatment planning as its first integrated operational capability. The new MINERVA system will ultimately incorporate capabilities for a comprehensive list of radiation therapies. In progress are modules for external beam photon-electron therapy and boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). Brachytherapy and proton therapy are planned. Through the open application programming interface (API), other groups can add their own modules and share them with the community.

[1]  Kai Vetter,et al.  Treatment planning for molecular targeted radionuclide therapy. , 2002, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[2]  Floyd J. Wheeler,et al.  Computational dosimetry and treatment planning for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy , 1997, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[3]  Charles A Wemple,et al.  Application of MINERVA Monte Carlo simulations to targeted radionuclide therapy. , 2003, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[4]  P. Rubin Law and order of radiation sensitivity. Absolute versus relative. , 1989, Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology.

[5]  T K Johnson,et al.  On the possibility of 'real-time' Monte Carlo calculations for the estimation of absorbed dose in radioimmunotherapy. , 1989, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[6]  D. E. Wessol,et al.  MINERVA-a multi-modal radiation treatment planning system. , 2004, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[7]  Stephen R. Thomas Options for radionuclide therapy: from fixed activity to patient-specific treatment planning. , 2002, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[8]  W E Bolch,et al.  MIRD pamphlet No. 17: the dosimetry of nonuniform activity distributions--radionuclide S values at the voxel level. Medical Internal Radiation Dose Committee. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  A Monte-Carlo method for interface dosimetry of beta emitters. , 2003, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[10]  D. Nigg Computational Dosimetry and Treatment Planning Considerations for Neutron Capture Therapy , 2003, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[11]  Guy L. Steele,et al.  The Java Language Specification , 1996 .

[12]  M. Flower,et al.  Estimation and implications of random errors in whole-body dosimetry for targeted radionuclide therapy. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  M. Sonenberg,et al.  The relation of radioiodine dosimetry to results and complications in the treatment of metastatic thyroid cancer. , 1962, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[14]  W. S. Snyder,et al.  Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom. , 1974, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  P. Rubin Law and Order of Radiation Sensitivity , 1989 .

[16]  R. Wahl The clinical importance of dosimetry in radioimmunotherapy with tositumomab and iodine I 131 tositumomab. , 2003, Seminars in oncology.

[17]  B. Wessels,et al.  MIRD pamphlet no. 16: Techniques for quantitative radiopharmaceutical biodistribution data acquisition and analysis for use in human radiation dose estimates. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  M. Flower,et al.  Absorbed dose ratios for repeated therapy of neuroblastoma with I-131 mIBG. , 2003, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[19]  C S Chui,et al.  Implementation of a Monte Carlo dosimetry method for patient-specific internal emitter therapy. , 1997, Medical physics.

[20]  G. Denardo,et al.  Yttrium-90/indium-111-DOTA-peptide-chimeric L6: pharmacokinetics, dosimetry and initial results in patients with incurable breast cancer. , 1997, Anticancer research.

[21]  J. Wong,et al.  A method including edge effects for the estimation of radioimmunotherapy absorbed doses in the tumor xenograft model. , 1994, Medical physics.

[22]  G. Denardo,et al.  Requirements for a treatment planning system for radioimmunotherapy. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  T. Johnson,et al.  MABDOSE. II: Validation of a general purpose dose estimation code. , 1999, Medical physics.

[24]  G. Denardo,et al.  Impact of interpatient pharmacokinetic variability on design considerations for therapy with radiolabeled MAbs. , 2003, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[25]  P M Evans,et al.  Combining dosimetry for targeted radionuclide and external beam therapies using the biologically effective dose. , 2003, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[26]  A. Zelenetz A clinical and scientific overview of tositumomab and iodine I 131 tositumomab. , 2003, Seminars in oncology.

[27]  C S Chui,et al.  A Monte Carlo approach to patient-specific dosimetry. , 1996, Medical physics.

[28]  B. Faddegon,et al.  Description and dosimetric verification of the PEREGRINE Monte Carlo dose calculation system for photon beams incident on a water phantom. , 2001, Medical physics.