Prevalence of dementia in Latin America, India, and China: a population-based cross-sectional survey

Summary Background Studies have suggested that the prevalence of dementia is lower in developing than in developed regions. We investigated the prevalence and severity of dementia in sites in low-income and middle-income countries according to two definitions of dementia diagnosis. Methods We undertook one-phase cross-sectional surveys of all residents aged 65 years and older (n=14 960) in 11 sites in seven low-income and middle-income countries (China, India, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Venezuela, Mexico, and Peru). Dementia diagnosis was made according to the culturally and educationally sensitive 10/66 dementia diagnostic algorithm, which had been prevalidated in 25 Latin American, Asian, and African centres; and by computerised application of the dementia criterion from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV). We also compared prevalence of DSM-IV dementia in each of the study sites with that from estimates in European studies. Findings The prevalence of DSM-IV dementia varied widely, from 0·3% (95% CI 0·1–0·5) in rural India to 6·3% (5·0–7·7) in Cuba. After standardisation for age and sex, DSM-IV prevalence in urban Latin American sites was four-fifths of that in Europe (standardised morbidity ratio 80 [95% CI 70–91]), but in China the prevalence was only half (56 [32–91] in rural China), and in India and rural Latin America a quarter or less of the European prevalence (18 [5–34] in rural India). 10/66 dementia prevalence was higher than that of DSM-IV dementia, and more consistent across sites, varying between 5·6% (95% CI 4·2–7·0) in rural China and 11·7% (10·3–13·1) in the Dominican Republic. The validity of the 847 of 1345 cases of 10/66 dementia not confirmed by DSM-IV was supported by high levels of associated disability (mean WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II score 33·7 [SD 28·6]). Interpretation As compared with the 10/66 dementia algorithm, the DSM-IV dementia criterion might underestimate dementia prevalence, especially in regions with low awareness of this emerging public-health problem. Funding Wellcome Trust (UK); WHO; the US Alzheimer's Association; and Fondo Nacional De Ciencia Y Tecnologia, Consejo De Desarrollo Cientifico Y Humanistico, and Universidad Central De Venezuela (Venezuela).

[1]  B. Reisberg,et al.  Diagnostic Criteria in Dementia: A Comparison of Current Criteria, Research Challenges, and Implications for DSM-V , 2006, Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology.

[2]  R. Stewart,et al.  The protocols for the 10/66 dementia research group population-based research programme , 2007, BMC Public Health.

[3]  A. Pickles,et al.  Two-phase epidemiological surveys in psychiatric research , 1999, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  S. DeKosky,et al.  Incidence of Alzheimer’s disease in a rural community in India , 2001, Neurology.

[5]  M. Prince Methodological issues for population‐based research into dementia in developing countries. A position paper from the 10/66 Dementia Research Group , 2000, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[6]  A. King,et al.  The question of familial meningiomas and schwannomas: , 2000, Neurology.

[7]  K. Kieburtz,et al.  Prevalence of dementia in rural China: impact of age, gender and education , 2006, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[8]  M. Prince,et al.  Caregivers of people with Alzheimer's disease: a qualitative study from the Indian 10/66 Dementia Research Network , 2003, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[9]  R. Nitrini,et al.  Mortality from dementia in a community‐dwelling Brazilian population , 2005, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[10]  R. Katzman.,et al.  Cross‐national interrater agreement on the clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia , 1994, Neurology.

[11]  R. Stewart,et al.  The 10/66 Dementia Research Group's fully operationalised DSM-IV dementia computerized diagnostic algorithm, compared with the 10/66 dementia algorithm and a clinician diagnosis: a population validation study , 2008, BMC public health.

[12]  M. Prince,et al.  Dementia diagnosis in developing countries: a cross-cultural validation study , 2003, The Lancet.

[13]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  A Ogunniyi,et al.  Incidence of dementia and Alzheimer disease in 2 communities: Yoruba residing in Ibadan, Nigeria, and African Americans residing in Indianapolis, Indiana. , 2001, JAMA.

[15]  M. Prince,et al.  Commentary: Two-phase surveys. A death is announced; no flowers please. , 2003, International journal of epidemiology.

[16]  M. Prince,et al.  The diagnosis of dementia in the community , 2007, International Psychogeriatrics.

[17]  D. Ames,et al.  Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in developing countries , 2004, International Psychogeriatrics.

[18]  M. Prince The need for research on dementia in developing countries , 1997, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[19]  J. Robine,et al.  The relationship between age and the prevalence of senile dementia: a meta-analysis of recent data. , 1992, International journal of epidemiology.

[20]  G. Livingston,et al.  Mental health care for the elderly in low-income countries: a health systems approach. , 2007, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[21]  O. Gureje,et al.  Risk of mortality for dementia in a developing country: the Yoruba in Nigeria , 2002, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[22]  S. DeKosky,et al.  Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in rural India , 1998, Neurology.

[23]  V Hachinski,et al.  The effect of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dementia. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  L. Berg,et al.  Cross-national interrater reliability of dementia diagnosis in the elderly and factors associated with disagreement , 1996, Neurology.

[25]  P. Menezes,et al.  High prevalence of dementia among older adults from poor socioeconomic backgrounds in São Paulo, Brazil , 2008, International Psychogeriatrics.

[26]  G. Maestre,et al.  High Prevalence of Dementia in a Caribbean Population , 2007, Neuroepidemiology.

[27]  C. Mathers,et al.  Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study , 2005, The Lancet.

[28]  J. Copeland,et al.  A computerized psychiatric diagnostic system and case nomenclature for elderly subjects: GMS and AGECAT , 1986, Psychological Medicine.

[29]  J. Petzel Diagnostic Issues in Dementia: Advancing the Research Agenda for DSM-V , 2008 .

[30]  A. Hofman,et al.  Incidence of dementia and major subtypes in Europe: A collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurologic Diseases in the Elderly Research Group. , 2000, Neurology.

[31]  V. Patel,et al.  Ageing and mental health in a developing country: who cares? Qualitative studies from Goa, India , 2001, Psychological Medicine.

[32]  Shekhar Saxena,et al.  On the development and psychometric testing of the WHO screening instrument to assess disablement in the general population , 1999 .

[33]  Zhenxin Zhang,et al.  Socio-Demographic Variation of Dementia Subtypes in China: Methodology and Results of a Prevalence Study in Beijing, Chengdu, Shanghai, and Xian , 2006, Neuroepidemiology.

[34]  H C Hendrie,et al.  Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and dementia in two communities: Nigerian Africans and African Americans. , 1995, The American journal of psychiatry.

[35]  M. Prince Care arrangements for people with dementia in developing countries , 2004, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[36]  G. Ratcliff,et al.  Cognitive Test Performance in a Community-Based Nondemented Elderly Sample in Rural India: The Indo-U.S. Cross-National Dementia Epidemiology Study , 1996, International Psychogeriatrics.

[37]  A. Hofman,et al.  Prevalence of dementia and major subtypes in Europe: A collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurologic Diseases in the Elderly Research Group. , 2000, Neurology.