论文信息 - PSHA: is it science?

PSHA: is it science?

Abstract Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is beginning to be seen as unreliable. The problem with PSHA is that its data are inadequate and its logic is defective. Much more reliable, and more scientific, are deterministic procedures, especially when coupled with engineering judgment.

Cinna Lomnitz | Heriberta Castaños | C. Lomnitz | H. Castaños

[1] Cinna Lomnitz,et al. Fundamentals of Earthquake Prediction , 1994 .

[2] K. F. Gauss,et al. Theoria combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxiae , 1823 .

[3] Gail M. Atkinson,et al. Reassessing the new madrid seismic zone , 2000 .

[4] Ellis L. Krinitzsky,et al. How to obtain earthquake ground motions for engineering design , 2002 .

[5] John Schneider,et al. Uncertainties in Seismic Hazard Maps for the New Madrid Seismic Zone and Implications for Seismic Hazard Communication , 2001 .