Quantitative assessment of mis-registration issues of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)

Image distortions caused by eddy current and patient motion have been two major sources of the mis-registration issues in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Numerous registration methods have been proposed to correct them. However, quality control of DTI remains an important issue, because we rarely report how much mis-registration existed and how well they were corrected. In this paper, we propose a method for quantitative reporting of DTI data quality. This registration method minimizes a cost function based on mean square tensor fitting errors. Registration with twelve-parameter full affine transformation is used. From the registration result, distortion and motion parameters are estimated. Because the translation parameters involve both eddy-current-induced image translation and the patient motion, by analyzing the transformation model, we separate them by removing the contributions that are linearly correlated with diffusion gradients. We define the metrics measuring the amounts of distortion, rotation, translation. We tested our method on a database with 64 subjects and found the statistics of each of metrics. Finally we demonstrate that how these statistics can be used for assessing the data quality quantitatively in several examples.

[1]  Edward W. Hsu,et al.  Distortion correction using mutual information in 3D diffusion tensor microscopy , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[2]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  C. Pierpaoli,et al.  Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Michael Deppe,et al.  Correcting eddy current and motion effects by affine whole‐brain registrations: Evaluation of three‐dimensional distortions and comparison with slicewise correction , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Distortion correction and robust tensor estimation for MR diffusion imaging , 2002, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  P. Basser,et al.  Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion‐weighted MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  A. W. Joshi,et al.  Elements of group theory for physicists , 1974 .

[9]  M E Bastin,et al.  Correction of eddy current-induced artefacts in diffusion tensor imaging using iterative cross-correlation. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  P. Basser,et al.  A unifying theoretical and algorithmic framework for least squares methods of estimation in diffusion tensor imaging. , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[11]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools , 2005, NeuroImage.