Partnering Up: Including Managers as Research Partners in Systematic Reviews

Systematic reviews of academic research have not impacted management practice as much as many researchers had hoped. Part of the reason is that researchers and managers differ significantly in their knowledge systems—in both what they know and how they know it. Researchers can overcome some of these challenges by including managers as knowledge partners in the research endeavor; however, doing so is rife with challenges. This article seeks to answer, how can researchers and managers navigate the tensions related to differences in their knowledge systems to create more impactful systematic reviews? To answer this question, we embarked on a data-guided journey of the experience of the Network for Business Sustainability, which had undertaken 15 systematic reviews that involved researchers and managers. We interviewed previous participants of the projects, observed different systematic review processes, and collected archival data to learn more about researcher-manager collaborations in the systematic review process. This article offers guidance to researchers in imbricating academic with practical knowledge in the systematic review process.

[1]  Denise E Ross,et al.  Income Inequality , 2020 .

[2]  Pratima Bansal,et al.  Cocreating Rigorous and Relevant Knowledge , 2020 .

[3]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Interpreting results and drawing conclusions , 2019, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

[4]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  From the Editors—Seeing Practice Impact in New Ways , 2018, Academy of Management Journal.

[5]  S. Rynes,et al.  When the “Best Available Evidence” Doesn’t Win: How Doubts About Science and Scientists Threaten the Future of Evidence-Based Management , 2018, Journal of Management.

[6]  Carl Rhodes,et al.  The teaching of the other: Ethical vulnerability and generous reciprocity in the research process , 2018 .

[7]  R. Adams,et al.  Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies , 2017 .

[8]  B. Cooke,et al.  Impact and Management Research: Exploring Relationships between Temporality, Dialogue, Reflexivity and Praxis , 2017 .

[9]  John Bessant,et al.  Sustainability‐Oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review , 2016 .

[10]  D. Souder,et al.  Time Horizon of Investments in the Resource Allocation Process , 2016 .

[11]  M. Patterson,et al.  Organizations Driving Positive Social Change , 2016 .

[12]  Alexander T. Nicolai,et al.  The Intellectual Link Between Management Research and Popularization Media: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Harvard Business Review , 2015 .

[13]  Thomas G. Cummings,et al.  Scholarly Impact: A Pluralist Conceptualization , 2014 .

[14]  R. L. Dipboye.  Bridging the Gap in Organizational Behavior: A Review of Jone Pearce's Organizational Behavior: Real Research for Real Managers , 2014 .

[15]  Jean M. Bartunek,et al.  Academics and Practitioners Are Alike and Unlike , 2014 .

[16]  James R Cook.  Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2014 .

[17]  Jason T Jay,et al.  Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations , 2013 .

[18]  K. Orr,et al.  Public Administration Scholarship and the Politics of Coproducing Academic–Practitioner Research , 2012 .

[19]  David Denyer,et al.  Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool , 2012 .

[20]  Pratima Bansal,et al.  Bridging the Research–Practice Gap , 2012 .

[21]  A. Kieser,et al.  Collaborate With Practitioners , 2012 .

[22]  R. Briner,et al.  Evidence-Based Management: Concept Cleanup Time? , 2009 .

[23]  T. Reay,et al.  What's the Evidence on Evidence-Based Management? , 2009 .

[24]  A. Kieser,et al.  Why the Rigour-Relevance Gap in Management Research is Unbridgeable , 2009 .

[25]  S. Dwyer,et al.  The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[26]  Sari Stenfors,et al.  Exploring the Edges of Theory-Practice Gap: Epistemic Cultures in Strategy-Tool Development and Use , 2009 .

[27]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field's Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge through Syntheses , 2008 .

[28]  Lotte S. Luscher,et al.  Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox , 2008 .

[29]  Jean M. Bartunek,et al.  Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration. , 2007 .

[30]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research , 2007 .

[31]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Perceived Causes and Solutions of the Translation Problem in Management Research , 2007 .

[32]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Educating Managers From an Evidence-Based Perspective , 2007 .

[33]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[34]  F. Vermeulen.  On Rigor and Relevance: Fostering Dialectic Progress in Management Research , 2005 .

[35]  Jonathan Adams,et al.  Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact , 2005, Scientometrics.

[36]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[37]  Eduard Bonet,et al.  Sharing and expanding academic and practitioner knowledge in health care , 2003, Journal of health services research & policy.

[38]  Christopher Grey,et al.  Re‐imagining Relevance: A Response to Starkey and Madan , 2001 .

[39]  M. Kondrat.  Concept, Act, and Interest in Professional Practice: Implications of an Empowerment Perspective , 1995, Social Service Review.

[40]  Raymond F. Zammuto,et al.  Organization Science, Managers, and Language Games , 1992 .

[41]  Mary Ellen Kondrat,et al.  Reclaiming the Practical: Formal and Substantive Rationality in Social Work Practice , 1992, Social Service Review.

[42]  Jean M. Bartunek,et al.  Insider/Outsider Research Teams , 1992 .

[43]  Meryl Reis Louis,et al.  Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: “Inquiry from the Inside” and “Inquiry from the Outside” , 1981 .

[44]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Practices for leveraging the paradoxes of engaged scholarship , 2017 .

[45]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences , 2006 .

[46]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[47]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[48]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[49]  W. James.  Scientific Books: Pragmatism, a New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking: Popular Lectures on Philosophy , 1907 .

[50]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Knowledge for Theory and Practice , 2022 .