Disentangling the Causes for Faster-X Evolution in Aphids

Faster evolution of X chromosomes has been documented in several species and results from the increased efficiency of selection on recessive alleles in hemizygous males and/or from increased drift due to the smaller effective population size of X chromosomes. Aphids are excellent models for evaluating the importance of selection in faster-X evolution, because their peculiar life-cycle and unusual inheritance of sex-chromosomes lead to equal effective population sizes for X and autosomes. Because we lack a high-density genetic map for the pea aphid whose complete genome has been sequenced, we assigned its entire genome to the X and autosomes based on ratios of sequencing depth in males and females. Unexpectedly, we found frequent scaffold misassembly, but we could unambiguously locate 13,726 genes on the X and 19,263 on autosomes. We found higher non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions ratios (dN/dS) for X-linked than for autosomal genes. Our analyses of substitution rates together with polymorphism and expression data showed that relaxed selection is likely to contribute predominantly to faster-X as a large fraction of X-linked genes are expressed at low rates and thus escape selection. Yet, a minor role for positive selection is also suggested by the difference between substitution rates for X and autosomes for male-biased genes (but not for asexual female-biased genes) and by lower Tajima’s D for X-linked than for autosomal genes with highly male-biased expression patterns. This study highlights the relevance of organisms displaying alternative inheritance of chromosomes to the understanding of forces shaping genome evolution.

[1]  F. Legeai,et al.  Dosage compensation and sex-specific epigenetic landscape of the X chromosome in the pea aphid , 2017, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[2]  Bernardo J. Clavijo,et al.  Rapid transcriptional plasticity of duplicated gene clusters enables a clonally reproducing aphid to colonise diverse plant species , 2017, Genome Biology.

[3]  F. Legeai,et al.  De novo transcriptome assembly of the grapevine phylloxera allows identification of genes differentially expressed between leaf- and root-feeding forms , 2016, BMC Genomics.

[4]  J. Feldmann,et al.  Impact of selenium supplementation on fish antiviral responses: a whole transcriptomic analysis in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed supranutritional levels of Sel-Plex® , 2016, BMC Genomics.

[5]  D. Presgraves,et al.  Drosophila X-Linked Genes Have Lower Translation Rates than Autosomal Genes. , 2015, Molecular biology and evolution.

[6]  David Sankoff,et al.  Locating rearrangement events in a phylogeny based on highly fragmented assemblies , 2016, BMC Genomics.

[7]  Beatriz Vicoso,et al.  The X Chromosome of Hemipteran Insects: Conservation, Dosage Compensation and Sex-Biased Expression , 2015, Genome biology and evolution.

[8]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Genetic characterisation of new host‐specialised biotypes and novel associations with bacterial symbionts in the pea aphid complex , 2015 .

[9]  J. Mullikin,et al.  Evaluation of variant detection software for pooled next-generation sequence data , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  J. Parsch,et al.  Variation in the X:Autosome Distribution of Male-Biased Genes among Drosophila melanogaster Tissues and Its Relationship with Dosage Compensation , 2015, Genome biology and evolution.

[11]  Jian-Rong Yang,et al.  Determinants of the rate of protein sequence evolution , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  P. David,et al.  Molecular Evolution of Freshwater Snails with Contrasting Mating Systems. , 2015, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The effects of sex-biased gene expression and X-linkage on rates of adaptive protein sequence evolution in Drosophila , 2015, Biology Letters.

[14]  N. Galtier,et al.  Gene expression, chromosome heterogeneity and the fast-X effect in mammals , 2015, Biology Letters.

[15]  Shinn-Ying Ho,et al.  SCMPSP: Prediction and characterization of photosynthetic proteins based on a scoring card method , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[16]  Hailong Zhu,et al.  Predicting protein functions using incomplete hierarchical labels , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  Christina Boucher,et al.  Misassembly detection using paired-end sequence reads and optical mapping data , 2014, Bioinform..

[18]  F Legeai,et al.  Whole-genome re-sequencing of non-model organisms: lessons from unmapped reads , 2014, Heredity.

[19]  F. Legeai,et al.  Genetic Control of Contagious Asexuality in the Pea Aphid , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[20]  J. Peccoud,et al.  WIDESPREAD HOST‐DEPENDENT HYBRID UNFITNESS IN THE PEA APHID SPECIES COMPLEX , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Faster-X Effects in Two Drosophila Lineages , 2014, Genome biology and evolution.

[22]  Jennifer F. Hughes,et al.  Sequencing the Mouse Y Chromosome Reveals Convergent Gene Acquisition and Amplification on Both Sex Chromosomes , 2014, Cell.

[23]  C. Rispe,et al.  Accelerated evolution of morph-biased genes in pea aphids. , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  J. Moffat,et al.  Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics , 2014, bioRxiv.

[25]  Timothy B Sackton,et al.  POSITIVE SELECTION DRIVES FASTER‐Z EVOLUTION IN SILKMOTHS , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[27]  D. Halligan,et al.  Faster-X Adaptive Protein Evolution in House Mice , 2013, Genetics.

[28]  R. Meisel,et al.  The faster-X effect: integrating theory and data. , 2013, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[29]  J. Poulain,et al.  Masculinization of the X Chromosome in the Pea Aphid , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[30]  T. Cezard,et al.  Estimation of population allele frequencies from next‐generation sequencing data: pool‐versus individual‐based genotyping , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[31]  J. Dunham,et al.  Widespread Selection Across Coding and Noncoding DNA in the Pea Aphid Genome , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[32]  J. Parsch,et al.  The evolutionary causes and consequences of sex-biased gene expression , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[33]  F. Legeai,et al.  Genome scans reveal candidate regions involved in the adaptation to host plant in the pea aphid complex , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[34]  A. Wilm,et al.  LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Genomic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster , 2012, Genetics.

[36]  S. Namekawa,et al.  Human postmeiotic sex chromatin and its impact on sex chromosome evolution , 2012, Genome research.

[37]  N. Johnson,et al.  The genetics of sex chromosomes: evolution and implications for hybrid incompatibility , 2012, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.

[39]  Kevin R. Thornton,et al.  The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel , 2012, Nature.

[40]  F. Legeai,et al.  Accelerated evolution of sex chromosomes in aphids, an x0 system. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[41]  Jun Wang,et al.  Extensive X-linked adaptive evolution in central chimpanzees , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Are all sex chromosomes created equal? , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[43]  T. Fukatsu,et al.  Facultative Symbiont Infections Affect Aphid Reproduction , 2011, PloS one.

[44]  N. Friedman,et al.  Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[45]  M. DePristo,et al.  A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[46]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  The Ecoresponsive Genome of Daphnia pulex , 2011, Science.

[47]  A. Futschik,et al.  PoPoolation: A Toolbox for Population Genetic Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data from Pooled Individuals , 2011, PloS one.

[48]  Adam Eyre-Walker,et al.  Estimation of the neutrality index. , 2011, Molecular biology and evolution.

[49]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[50]  M. DePristo,et al.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. , 2010, Genome research.

[51]  C. Meiklejohn,et al.  Genetic conflict and sex chromosome evolution. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  W. Huber,et al.  which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. MAnorm: a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets , 2011 .

[53]  J. Mank,et al.  EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE AND THE FASTER‐X EFFECT: EMPIRICAL RESULTS AND THEIR INTERPRETATION , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[54]  J. Mank,et al.  Faster-Z evolution is predominantly due to genetic drift. , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[55]  G. K. Davis,et al.  Genome Sequence of the Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum , 2010, PLoS biology.

[56]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[57]  D. Absher,et al.  A role for a neo-sex chromosome in stickleback speciation , 2009, Nature.

[58]  N. Moran,et al.  Post-Pleistocene radiation of the pea aphid complex revealed by rapidly evolving endosymbionts , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Effective Population Size and the Faster-X Effect: An Extended Model , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[60]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[61]  J. Peccoud,et al.  A continuum of genetic divergence from sympatric host races to species in the pea aphid complex , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  M. Plantegenest,et al.  Host races of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum differ in male wing phenotypes , 2009, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[63]  Thomas Schiex,et al.  FrameDP: sensitive peptide detection on noisy matured sequences , 2009, Bioinform..

[64]  D. Adler,et al.  Mouse X chromosome , 2009, Mammalian Genome.

[65]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Host range expansion of an introduced insect pest through multiple colonizations of specialized clones , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[66]  S. Garcia-Vallvé,et al.  CAIcal: A combined set of tools to assess codon usage adaptation , 2008, Biology Direct.

[67]  D. Hartl,et al.  Effects of X-linkage and sex-biased gene expression on the rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[68]  G. Achaz Testing for Neutrality in Samples With Sequencing Errors , 2008, Genetics.

[69]  S. Nuzhdin,et al.  Rarity of Males in Pea Aphids Results in Mutational Decay , 2008, Science.

[70]  M. Mandrioli,et al.  Analysis of heterochromatic epigenetic markers in the holocentric chromosomes of the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum , 2007, Chromosome Research.

[71]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Sex Chromosome-Linked Species Recognition and Evolution of Reproductive Isolation in Flycatchers , 2007, Science.

[72]  Hans Ellegren,et al.  The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[73]  Gerard Talavera,et al.  Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[74]  J. R. Lobry,et al.  SeqinR 1.0-2: A Contributed Package to the R Project for Statistical Computing Devoted to Biological Sequences Retrieval and Analysis , 2007 .

[75]  A. Arnold,et al.  Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. , 2006, Genome research.

[76]  Wen-Hsiung Li Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution , 2006, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[77]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes , 2005, Heredity.

[78]  C. Wilke,et al.  Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Significant impact of protein dispensability on the instantaneous rate of protein evolution. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[81]  Doron Lancet,et al.  Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification , 2005, Bioinform..

[82]  James Ostell,et al.  The Genome Assembly Archive: A New Public Resource , 2004, PLoS biology.

[83]  R. Camerini-Otero,et al.  The mouse X chromosome is enriched for sex-biased genes not subject to selection by meiotic sex chromosome inactivation , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[84]  Rama S. Singh,et al.  Sex-linked mammalian sperm proteins evolve faster than autosomal ones. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[85]  Justen Andrews,et al.  Paucity of Genes on the Drosophila X Chromosome Showing Male-Biased Expression , 2003, Science.

[86]  C. Braendle,et al.  A sex-linked locus controls wing polymorphism in males of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) , 2002, Heredity.

[87]  Wei Qian,et al.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[88]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.

[89]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[90]  P. Sunnucks,et al.  RANDOM LOSS OF X CHROMOSOME AT MALE DETERMINATION IN AN APHID, SITOBION NEAR FRAGARIAE, DETECTED USING AN X-LINKED POLYMORPHIC MICROSATELLITE MARKER , 1997 .

[91]  A. Caballero,et al.  On the effective size of populations with separate sexes, with particular reference to sex-linked genes. , 1995, Genetics.

[92]  Armando Caballero,et al.  Developments in the prediction of effective population size , 1994, Heredity.

[93]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila , 1991, Nature.

[94]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[95]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian populations. 1931. , 1990, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[96]  G. Lavorgna,et al.  The abnormal oocyte phenotype is correlated with the presence of blood transposon in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1989, Genetics.

[97]  F. Tajima Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. , 1989, Genetics.

[98]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  The Relative Rates of Evolution of Sex Chromosomes and Autosomes , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[99]  W. Rice SEX CHROMOSOMES AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[100]  M. Kimura The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution: Introduction , 1983 .

[101]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.