Estimation of test-day model (co)variance components across breeds using New Zealand dairy cattle data.

In New Zealand, a large proportion of cows are currently crossbreds, mostly Holstein-Friesians (HF) x Jersey (JE). The genetic evaluation system for milk yields is considering the same additive genetic effects for all breeds. The objective was to model different additive effects according to parental breeds to obtain first estimates of correlations among breed-specific effects and to study the usefulness of this type of random regression test-day model. Estimates of (co)variance components for purebred HF and JE cattle in purebred herds were computed by using a single-breed model. This analysis showed differences between the 2 breeds, with a greater variability in the HF breed. (Co)variance components for purebred HF and JE and crossbred HF x JE cattle were then estimated by using a complete multibreed model in which computations of complete across-breed (co)variances were simplified by correlating only eigenvectors for HF and JE random regressions of the same order as obtained from the single-breed analysis. Parameter estimates differed more strongly than expected between the single-breed and multibreed analyses, especially for JE. This could be due to differences between animals and management in purebred and non-purebred herds. In addition, the model used only partially accounted for heterosis. The multibreed analysis showed additive genetic differences between the HF and JE breeds, expressed as genetic correlations of additive effects in both breeds, especially in linear and quadratic Legendre polynomials (respectively, 0.807 and 0.604). The differences were small for overall milk production (0.926). Results showed that permanent environmental lactation curves were highly correlated across breeds; however, intraherd lactation curves were also affected by the breed-environment interaction. This result may indicate the existence of breed-specific competition effects that vary through the different lactation stages. In conclusion, a multibreed model similar to the one presented could optimally use the environmental and genetic parameters and provide breed-dependent additive breeding values. This model could also be a useful tool to evaluate crossbred dairy cattle populations like those in New Zealand. However, a routine evaluation would still require the development of an improved methodology. It would also be computationally very challenging because of the simultaneous presence of a large number of breeds.

[1]  A. Reverter,et al.  Purebred-crossbred performance and genetic evaluation of postweaning growth and carcass traits in Bos indicus x Bos taurus crosses in Australia. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[2]  W. Montgomerie Experiences with dairy cattle crossbreeding in New Zealand , 2002 .

[3]  N. López-Villalobos,et al.  Environmental sensitivity in New Zealand dairy cattle. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  B. Harris,et al.  Development of a national production testday model for New Zealand , 2006 .

[5]  Per Madsen,et al.  Residual maximum likelihood estimation of (co)variance components in multivariate mixed linear models using average information , 1997 .

[6]  J. V. D. van der Werf,et al.  Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[7]  I Misztal,et al.  Genetic correlations between two strains of Durocs and crossbreds from differing production environments for slaughter traits. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[8]  B. Harris Animal model for New Zealand dairy cattle evaluation , 1994 .

[9]  A. H. Sanders,et al.  Economic merit of crossbred and purebred US dairy cattle. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  R. W. Touchberry Crossbreeding effects in dairy cattle: the Illinois Experiment, 1949 to 1969. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  H. H. Timm,et al.  Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[12]  F. Schenkel,et al.  Additive, dominance, and epistatic loss effects on preweaning weight gain of crossbred beef cattle from different Bos taurus breeds. , 2005, Journal of animal science.

[13]  L. Dempfle,et al.  Genetic parameters for milk production and body size in New Zealand Holstein-Friesian and Jersey , 1992 .

[14]  N. López-Villalobos,et al.  Short communication: Effect of environment on the expression of breed and heterosis effects for production traits. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  Johnson Dl Estimation of lactation yield from repeated measures of test day yields , 1996 .

[16]  W. E. Vinson,et al.  Heritability of Milk Yield at Different Herd Means and Variance for Production , 1985 .

[17]  J. E. Legates Heritability of Fat Yields in Herds with Different Production Levels , 1962 .

[18]  B. Harris,et al.  Review of Holsteinization on Intensive Pastoral Dairy Farming in New Zealand , 2001 .

[19]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Strategies for estimating the parameters needed for different test-day models. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.