Overcoming Obstacles to Understanding and Solving Word Problems in Mathematics

ABSTRACT The trouble students have with solving word problems often comes from the difficulty in understanding the problem structure embedded in the problem text. This research was conducted to study the interactive effects of learner and instructional variables on understanding and solving word problems among Filipino‐English bilingual grade school students in the Philippines. The results showed better understanding and solution performance (1) when problems were written in the students’ first language, (2) when the problems were re‐worded to state more explicitly the relationship among the known and unknown quantities, (3) for students in higher levels of schooling and (4) for students with higher levels of academic achievement. The effects of re‐wording were mediated by the effects of the language; and the effects of language also varied between the highand low‐achievement students. In most cases where the students’ performance improved, the improvement seems to be due to better comprehension of the te...

[1]  Mary S. Riley,et al.  Development of Children's Problem-Solving Ability in Arithmetic. , 1984 .

[2]  W Kintsch,et al.  Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. , 1985, Psychological review.

[3]  E. Stern,et al.  What makes certain arithmetic word problems involving the comparison of sets so difficult for children , 1993 .

[4]  Lawal O. Adetula,et al.  Language factor: Does it affect children's performance on word problems? , 1990 .

[5]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. , 1988 .

[6]  K. McGilly,et al.  Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. , 1994 .

[7]  K. Hakuta.  The Mirror Of Language: The Debate On Bilingualism , 1987 .

[8]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  The Role of Rewording and Context Personalization in the Solving of Mathematical Word Problems. , 1991 .

[9]  Tom Hudson,et al.  Correspondences and Numerical Differences between Disjoint Sets. , 1983 .

[10]  P. Cobb.  Where Is the Mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development , 1994 .

[11]  E. Corte.  Fostering cognitive growth: A perspective from research on mathematics learning and instruction , 1995 .

[12]  Barbara L. McCombs,et al.  How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education. , 1998 .

[13]  Philip Clarkson.  Language comprehension errors: A further investigation , 1991 .

[14]  C. Benbow,et al.  Enhanced problem translation and short-term memory: components of mathematical talent , 1990 .

[15]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Influence of the semantic structure of word problems on second graders' eye movements. , 1990 .

[16]  Paul Black,et al.  Changing the Subject: Innovations in Science, Maths and Technology Education , 1996 .

[17]  Vadim Andreevich Krutet︠s︡kiĭ.  The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren , 1976 .

[18]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examination , 1995 .

[19]  E. Corte,et al.  The Effect of Semantic Structure on First Graders' Strategies for Solving Addition and Subtraction Word Problems. , 1987 .

[20]  James M. Moser,et al.  Representation of Addition and Subtraction Word Problems. , 1988 .

[21]  Hermine H. Marshall.  Recent and emerging theoretical frameworks for research on classroom learning : contributions and limitations , 1996 .

[22]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Language and mathematics: A comparison of bilingual and monolingual students of mathematics , 1992 .

[23]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The role of understanding in solving word problems , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.