Soup Over Bean of Pure Joy: Culinary Ruminations of an Artificial Chef

We introduce a system for generating novel recipes and use that context to examine some current theoretical ideas for computational creativity. Specifically, we have found that the notion of a single inspiring set can be generalized into two separate sets used for generation and evaluation, respectively, with the result being greater novelty as well as system flexibility (and the potential for natural meta-level creativity), that explicitly measuring artefact typicality is not always necessary, and that explicitly defining an artefact hierarchically results in greater novelty.

[1]  Pablo Gervás Dynamic Inspiring Sets for Sustained Novelty in Poetry Generation , 2011, ICCC.

[2]  Pablo Gervás,et al.  WASP: Evaluation of Different Strategies for the Automatic Generation of Spanish Verse , 2002 .

[3]  Rafael Pérez y Pérez,et al.  Employing emotions to drive plot generation in a computer-based storyteller , 2007, Cognitive Systems Research.

[4]  Dan Ventura,et al.  Autonomously Creating Quality Images , 2011, ICCC.

[5]  Anna Jordanous Evaluating Evaluation: Assessing Progress in Computational Creativity Research , 2011, ICCC.

[6]  J. Gero,et al.  THE DIGITAL CLOCKWORK MUSE: A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF AESTHETIC EVOLUTION , 2006 .

[7]  Graeme Ritchie,et al.  Some Empirical Criteria for Attributing Creativity to a Computer Program , 2007, Minds and Machines.

[8]  F. K. Hanna,et al.  AM: A Case Study in AI Methodology , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Carlo Strapparava,et al.  THE ACT OF CREATING HUMOROUS ACRONYMS , 2005, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[10]  Kristian J. Hammond,et al.  CHEF: A Model of Case-Based Planning , 1986, AAAI.

[11]  George E. Lewis Too Many Notes: Computers, Complexity and Culture in Voyager , 2000, Leonardo Music Journal.

[12]  Tony Veale,et al.  Comprehending and Generating Apt Metaphors: A Web-driven, Case-based Approach to Figurative Language , 2007, AAAI.

[13]  Simon Colton,et al.  Creativity Versus the Perception of Creativity in Computational Systems , 2008, AAAI Spring Symposium: Creative Intelligent Systems.

[14]  K. Binsted,et al.  Computational rules for generating punning riddles , 1997 .

[15]  Rafael Pérez y Pérez,et al.  MEXICA: A computer model of a cognitive account of creative writing , 2001, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[16]  Bruce G. Buchanan,et al.  Creativity at the Metalevel: AAAI-2000 Presidential Address , 2001, AI Mag..

[17]  Pablo Gervás,et al.  An expert system for the composition of formal Spanish poetry , 2001, Knowl. Based Syst..

[18]  Thomas R. Hinrichs,et al.  Problem solving in open worlds - a case study in design , 1992 .

[19]  MSc PhD Simon Colton BSc Automated Theory Formation in Pure Mathematics , 2002, Distinguished Dissertations.

[20]  Anna Jordanous,et al.  A Fitness Function for Creativity in Jazz Improvisation and Beyond , 2010, ICCC.

[21]  João Batista S. de Oliveira,et al.  Measuring aesthetic distance between document templates and instances , 2006, DocEng '06.

[22]  Geraint A. Wiggins,et al.  A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems , 2006, Knowl. Based Syst..