Comparative research methods

In this entry, we discuss the opportunities and challenges of comparative research. We outline the major obstacles in terms of building a comparative theoretical framework, collecting good‐quality data and analyzing those data, and we also explicate the advantages and research questions that can be addressed when taking a comparative approach. Additionally, the entry discusses statistical techniques that can be used to analyze quantitative comparative data, and we end with a discussion on how globalization impacts comparative (mainly cross‐national) research, as well as how such trends might call for the integration of research with multiple research units at multiple levels.

[1]  F. Esser,et al.  Comparing Political Communication: Meeting the Challenges of Global Communication and Political Integration: The Significance of Comparative Research in a Changing World , 2004 .

[2]  J. Strömbäck,et al.  Exploring Some Antecedents of the Media’s Framing of Election News: A Comparison of Swedish and Belgian Election News , 2010 .

[3]  Claes H. de Vreese,et al.  Explaining Campaign News Coverage: How Medium, Time, and Context Explain Variation in the Media Framing of the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections , 2013 .

[4]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research , 2014 .

[5]  Sven Engesser,et al.  Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems , 2014 .

[6]  Chris Norris.  "To Entertain, Inform, and Educate": Still the Role of Public Television , 2001 .

[7]  Jochen Peter,et al.  Reliability in Cross-National Content Analysis , 2002 .

[8]  James Stanyer,et al.  Comparative media analysis: Why some fuzzy thinking might help. Applying fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to the personalization of mediated political communication , 2010 .

[9]  B. Rihoux.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods , 2006 .

[10]  Stephen D. Reese.  Understanding the Global Journalist: a hierarchy-of-influences approach , 2001 .

[11]  F. Esser.  Dimensions of Political News Cultures: Sound Bite and Image Bite News in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States , 2008 .

[12]  P. Norris.  Comparative Political Communications: Common Frameworks or Babelian Confusion? , 2009, Government and Opposition.

[13]  W. Wirth,et al.  Comparing Political Communication: Designs and Methods of Comparative Political Communication Research , 2004 .

[14]  Rens Vliegenthart,et al.  News coverage and support for European integration, 1990-2006 , 2008 .

[15]  F. Esser,et al.  Competing models of journalism? Political affairs coverage in US, British, German, Swiss, French and Italian newspapers , 2013 .

[16]  Claes H. de Vreese,et al.  Who's Afraid of Conflict? The Mobilizing Effect of Conflict Framing in Campaign News , 2014, British Journal of Political Science.

[17]  Linda Hantrais,et al.  Contextualization in cross-national comparative research , 1999 .

[18]  Moritz Büchi.  Measurement invariance in comparative Internet use research , 2021 .

[19]  Peter G. Mwesige,et al.  Modeling Perceived Influences on Journalism: Evidence from a Cross-National Survey of Journalists , 2010 .

[20]  Jonathan N. Katz,et al.  What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[21]  R. Berganza,et al.  Explaining Journalists' Trust in Public Institutions Across 20 Countries: Media Freedom, Corruption, and Ownership Matter Most , 2012 .

[22]  Sven E. Wilson,et al.  A Lot More to Do: The Sensitivity of Time-Series Cross-Section Analyses to Simple Alternative Specifications , 2007, Political Analysis.