Function of the MAPK scaffold protein, Ste5, requires a cryptic PH domain.

Ste5, the prototypic mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) scaffold protein, associates with plasma membrane-tethered Gbetagamma freed upon pheromone receptor occupancy, thereby initiating downstream signaling. We demonstrate that this interaction and membrane binding of an N-terminal amphipathic alpha-helix (PM motif) are not sufficient for Ste5 action. Rather, Ste5 contains a pleckstrin-homology (PH) domain (residues 388-518) that is essential for its membrane recruitment and function. Altering residues (R407S K411S) equivalent to those that mediate phosphoinositide binding in other PH domains abolishes Ste5 function. The isolated PH domain, but not a R407S K411S derivative, binds phosphoinositides in vitro. Ste5(R407S K411S) is expressed normally, retains Gbetagamma and Ste11 binding, and oligomerizes, yet is not recruited to the membrane in response to pheromone. Artificial membrane tethering of Ste5(R407S K411S) restores signaling. R407S K411S loss-of-function mutations abrogate the constitutive activity of gain-of-function Ste5 alleles, including one (P44L) that increases membrane affinity of the PM motif. Thus, the PH domain is essential for stable membrane recruitment of Ste5, and this association is critical for initiation of downstream signaling because it allows Ste5-bound Ste11 (MAPKKK) to be activated by membrane-bound Ste20 (MAPKKKK).

[1]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  R. Schekman,et al.  COPII-Coated Vesicle Formation Reconstituted with Purified Coat Proteins and Chemically Defined Liposomes , 1998, Cell.

[3]  J. Thorner,et al.  Mutations in the YRB1 gene encoding yeast ran-binding-protein-1 that impair nucleocytoplasmic transport and suppress yeast mating defects. , 2001, Genetics.

[4]  Nancy Kleckner,et al.  A Method for Gene Disruption That Allows Repeated Use of URA3 Selection in the Construction of Multiply Disrupted Yeast Strains , 1987, Genetics.

[5]  M. Wigler,et al.  Complexes between STE5 and components of the pheromone-responsive mitogen-activated protein kinase module. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Shibuya,et al.  The Dimerization Property of Glutathione S-Transferase Partially Reactivates Bcr-Abl Lacking the Oligomerization Domain* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Kuang Lin,et al.  A simple and fast secondary structure prediction method using hidden neural networks , 2005, Bioinform..

[8]  K. Clark,et al.  Pheromone Response in Yeast: Association of Bem1p with Proteins of the MAP Kinase Cascade and Actin , 1995, Science.

[9]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  The Pfam protein families database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles , 2002, Proteins.

[11]  G. Sprague,,et al.  Assay of yeast mating reaction. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[12]  J. Thorner,et al.  Mutational analysis suggests that activation of the yeast pheromone response mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway involves conformational changes in the Ste5 scaffold protein. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[13]  J. Hirschman,et al.  The G beta gamma complex of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Subcellular fractionation and protein-protein interactions. , 1997, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  A. Neiman,et al.  A Membrane Binding Domain in the Ste5 Scaffold Synergizes with Gβγ Binding to Control Localization and Signaling in Pheromone Response , 2005 .

[15]  E. Elion,et al.  Nuclear export and plasma membrane recruitment of the Ste5 scaffold are coordinated with oligomerization and association with signal transduction components. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[16]  E. Elion,et al.  The Ste 5 p scaffold , 2001 .

[17]  John B. Anderson,et al.  CDD: a curated Entrez database of conserved domain alignments , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[19]  Joseph D. Schrag,et al.  Interaction of a G-protein β-subunit with a conserved sequence in Ste20/PAK family protein kinases , 1998, Nature.

[20]  P. Pryciak,et al.  Membrane recruitment of the kinase cascade scaffold protein Ste5 by the Gbetagamma complex underlies activation of the yeast pheromone response pathway. , 1998, Genes & development.

[21]  D. Botstein,et al.  Suppression of yeast geranylgeranyl transferase I defect by alternative prenylation of two target GTPases, Rho1p and Cdc42p. , 1993, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  G. Fink,et al.  Laboratory course manual for methods in yeast genetics , 1986 .

[23]  E. Elion,et al.  Functional binding between Gβ and the LIM domain of Ste5 is required to activate the MEKK Ste11 , 1998, Current Biology.

[24]  E. Elion,et al.  The SH3-domain protein Bem1 coordinates mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade activation with cell cycle control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[25]  Matthias Peter,et al.  The nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24p may be regulated by auto‐inhibition , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[26]  D. Jenness.  Mutational Activation oftheSTE5GeneProduct Bypasses theRequirement forG Protein eandy Subunits intheYeastPheromone Response Pathway , 1994 .

[27]  G K Lewis,et al.  Isolation of monoclonal antibodies specific for human c-myc proto-oncogene product , 1985, Molecular and cellular biology.

[28]  Diana Murray,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of membrane targeting by S. cerevisiae pleckstrin homology domains. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[29]  B. Errede,et al.  Constitutive mutants of the protein kinase STE11 activate the yeast pheromone response pathway in the absence of the G protein. , 1992, Genes & development.

[30]  J. Thorner,et al.  Ste5 RING-H2 domain: role in Ste4-promoted oligomerization for yeast pheromone signaling. , 1997, Science.

[31]  J. Thorner,et al.  Mutational activation of the STE5 gene product bypasses the requirement for G protein beta and gamma subunits in the yeast pheromone response pathway , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[32]  J. Hirschman,et al.  Dual Lipid Modification of the Yeast Gγ Subunit Ste18p Determines Membrane Localization of Gβγ , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[33]  K. Clark,et al.  Association of the yeast pheromone response G protein beta gamma subunits with the MAP kinase scaffold Ste5p. , 1995, Science.

[34]  G. Sprague,,et al.  Protein-protein interactions in the yeast pheromone response pathway: Ste5p interacts with all members of the MAP kinase cascade. , 1994, Genetics.

[35]  Henrik G. Dohlman,et al.  Pheromone Signaling Mechanisms in Yeast: A Prototypical Sex Machine , 2004, Science.

[36]  S. Reed,et al.  Pheromone-induced phosphorylation of a G protein β subunit in S. cerevisiae is associated with an adaptive response to mating pheromone , 1991, Cell.

[37]  E. Elion,et al.  Nuclear Shuttling of Yeast Scaffold Ste5 Is Required for Its Recruitment to the Plasma Membrane and Activation of the Mating MAPK Cascade , 1999, Cell.

[38]  E. Elion,et al.  The Ste5p scaffold. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[39]  M. Peter,et al.  Phosphorylation of the MEKK Ste11p by the PAK-like kinase Ste20p is required for MAP kinase signaling in vivo , 2000, Current Biology.

[40]  A. Levitzki,et al.  Dimerization of Ste5, a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade scaffold protein, is required for signal transduction. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  The role of Far1p in linking the heterotrimeric G protein to polarity establishment proteins during yeast mating. , 1998, Science.

[42]  E. Elion,et al.  Ste5 tethers multiple protein kinases in the MAP kinase cascade required for mating in S. cerevisiae , 1994, Cell.

[43]  Rachel E. Lamson,et al.  Regulation of Kinase Activity and Signaling by the Yeast p 21-Activated Kinase Ste 20 , 2002 .

[44]  J. Hirschman,et al.  The Gβγ Complex of the Yeast Pheromone Response Pathway , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  E. Elion,et al.  Cdc24 Regulates Nuclear Shuttling and Recruitment of the Ste5 Scaffold to a Heterotrimeric G Protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[46]  Liam J. McGuffin,et al.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server , 2000, Bioinform..

[47]  R. Deschenes,et al.  [7] Characterization of protein prenylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1995 .

[48]  M. Peter,et al.  Site‐specific regulation of the GEF Cdc24p by the scaffold protein Far1p during yeast mating , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[49]  S. Emr,et al.  Location, Location, Location: Membrane Targeting Directed by PX Domains , 2001, Science.

[50]  S. Emr,et al.  The yeast synaptojanin-like proteins control the cellular distribution of phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[51]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[52]  Kendall J Blumer,et al.  The p21-activated Protein Kinase-related Kinase Cla4 Is a Coincidence Detector of Signaling by Cdc42 and Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  J. Thorner,et al.  Mutational analysis of STE5 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: application of a differential interaction trap assay for examining protein-protein interactions. , 1997, Genetics.