A Definition Framework for the Terms Nanomaterial and Nanoparticle

Scientific writings and policy documents define the terms nanomaterial and nanoparticle in various ways. This variation is considered problematic because the absence of a shared definition is understood as potentially hindering nanomaterial knowledge production and regulation. Another view is that the existence of a shared definition may itself cause problems, as rigid definitions arguably exclude important aspects of the studied phenomena. The aim of this paper is to inform this state of disagreement by providing analytical concepts for a systematic understanding of how, and even whether, nanomaterial and nanoparticle could and should be defined. To do this, we review definitions of nanomaterial and nanoparticle presented in research articles and policy documents. Definitions were identified by first conducting a Scopus search and then tracing cited definitions back to their sources. In total, 36 definitions were identified. Theories of definition from philosophy and linguistics provide analytical guidance for structuring and categorizing the identified definitions, and the main analytical dimensions of the definitions are then identified and discussed. Finally, we propose a framework for understanding the process of defining nanomaterial and nanoparticle. This framework considers both the generality needed for a shared understanding (by suggesting proto-definitions of nanomaterial and nanoparticle) and the level of precision required for different purposes (by allowing for various explications of the proto-definitions).

[1]  H. Putnam Meaning and Reference , 1973 .

[2]  Padmavati Manchikanti,et al.  Nanomaterials and Effects on Biological Systems: Development of Effective Regulatory Norms , 2010 .

[3]  Mark Crane,et al.  The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[4]  J. Flowerdew Definitions in Science Lectures , 1992 .

[5]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterials , 2007 .

[6]  Daniela Marrani,et al.  Nanotechnologies and Novel Foods in European Law , 2013 .

[7]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[8]  W. Quine Main trends in recent philosophy: two dogmas of empiricism. , 1951 .

[9]  Martha Marrapese,et al.  Current Perspectives in Nanotechnology Terminology and Nomenclature , 2011 .

[10]  Andrew D. Maynard,et al.  Don't define nanomaterials , 2011, Nature.

[11]  S. Laurence,et al.  Concepts: Core Readings , 1999 .

[12]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[13]  S. Laurence,et al.  Concepts and Cognitive Science , 1999 .

[14]  Jean-Paul Noben,et al.  Proteomics investigations of drug-induced hepatotoxicity in HepG2 cells. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[15]  John M Taylor,et al.  New Dimensions for Manufacturing: A UK Strategy for Nanotechnology , 2002 .

[16]  Carl G. Hempel,et al.  Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science , 1952 .

[17]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[18]  Joel D'Silva,et al.  Defining Nanomaterials for the Purpose of Regulation within the European Union , 2010, European Journal of Risk Regulation.

[19]  Maxim Y. Sheinin,et al.  The Novelty of Nano and the Regulatory Challenge of Newness , 2010 .

[20]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Nanotechnology Research Directions: IWGN Workshop Report. Vision for Nanotechnology R&D in the Next Decade , 1999 .

[21]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[22]  G. Lowry,et al.  Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[23]  W. Quine The two dogmas of empiricism , 1951 .

[24]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Gibson Peter,et al.  Considerations on a Definition of Nanomaterial for Regulatory Purposes , 2010 .

[26]  Fritz Allhoff,et al.  On the Autonomy and Justification of Nanoethics , 2007 .

[27]  Andrew D Maynard,et al.  The new toxicology of sophisticated materials: nanotoxicology and beyond. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[28]  Donald A. Tomalia,et al.  In quest of a systematic framework for unifying and defining nanoscience , 2009, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[29]  D. Allan Bromley Science, technology, and politics , 2002 .

[30]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology , 2007 .

[31]  William Ramsey,et al.  Thinking about Thinking: Philosophers Talk to Cognitive Scientists about Intuition@@@Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry , 2001 .

[32]  Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz Three Concepts of Definition , 1958 .

[33]  Marc Saner,et al.  Commercial, Societal and Administrative Benefits from the Analysis and Clarification of Definitions: The Case of Nanomaterials , 2013 .

[34]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Naming and Necessity , 1980 .

[35]  Alan Drengson,et al.  Precization and Definition , 2005 .

[36]  Sacha Loeve About a Definition of Nano: How to Articulate Nano and Technology? , 2010 .

[37]  Margaret A. Hamburg,et al.  FDA's Approach to Regulation of Products of Nanotechnology , 2012, Science.

[38]  Graeme Hodge,et al.  A Big Regulatory Tool-Box for a Small Technology , 2008 .

[39]  Sven Oven Hansson,et al.  How to define: a tutorial , 2006 .

[40]  J. Jehlička,et al.  Terrestrial and Extraterrestrial Fullerenes , 2003 .

[41]  Arne Naess Toward a theory of interpretation and preciseness , 2008 .

[42]  Christian Joachim,et al.  To be nano or not to be nano? , 2005, Nature materials.

[43]  John Flowerdew,et al.  Pragmatic modifications on the ‘representative’ speech act of defining , 1991 .

[44]  Qasim Chaudhry,et al.  A complementary definition of nanomaterial , 2010 .

[45]  Vicki Stone,et al.  Toxicology of nanoparticles: A historical perspective , 2007 .

[46]  O. Renn,et al.  Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance , 2006, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[47]  Julie W. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy , 2005, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[48]  Max Boholm,et al.  The many faces of nano in newspaper reporting , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[49]  Haibo Guo,et al.  Nature's Nanostructures , 2012 .

[50]  Fern Wickson,et al.  Social and Ethical Interactions with Nano: Mapping the Early Literature , 2007 .