Development and sensitivity of a method to select time- and flow-paced storm event sampling intervals for headwater streams

Water quality research and monitoring programs often form the basis from which related legislation is derived. Yet, no standard, protocol, or method is available for guiding the selection of a water quality sampling strategy for runoff from fields and small watersheds. The objective of this study was to develop a methodology that provides guidance in the selection of a water quality sampling strategy for headwater streams (drainage areas less than 2500 ha; 6,177 ac). The developed method is based on the dimensionless unit hydrograph and relationships of measured pollutant concentrations to discharge hydrographs. The methodology was designed for storm events with a specific return interval and a selected acceptable level of error in pollutant load. Nine input parameters (hydraulic length, watershed slope, curve number, drainage area, runoff coefficient, 10-year, one hour precipitation amount, 100-year, one hour precipitation amount, 10 year, 24 hour precipitation amount, and recurrence interval) were used to develop the design hydrograph. Both time- and flow-paced sampling techniques were considered. A global sensitivity analysis of the method indicated that time-paced sampling was primarily sensitive to parameters included in the time of concentration calculation (hydraulic length, watershed slope, and curve number). Flow-paced sampling showed some sensitivity to all nine input parameters. An example application illustrates the utility of the method. Use of the method should facilitate the selection of water quality sampling strategies for field and small watershed scale studies and aid in budgetary planning for sample collection and analysis. The measurements taken based on the recommended sampling strategy will provide more confidence in the pollutant storm load estimates.

[1]  R. D. Harmel,et al.  UNCERTAINTY IN MEASURED SEDIMENT AND NUTRIENT FLUX IN RUNOFF FROM SMALL AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS , 2005 .

[2]  R. D. Harmel,et al.  AUTOMATED STORM WATER SAMPLING ON SMALL WATERSHEDS , 2003 .

[3]  R. D. Harmel,et al.  CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING A WATER QUALITY SAMPLING STRATEGY , 2001 .

[4]  L. C. Brown,et al.  Pesticide Transport to Subsurface Tile Drains in Humid Regions of North America , 2001 .

[5]  M. H. Johnson,et al.  FLOW-PROPORTIONAL, TIME-COMPOSITED, AND GRAB SAMPLE ESTIMATION OF NITROGEN EXPORT FROM AN EASTERN COASTAL PLAIN WATERSHED , 2000 .

[6]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Timing, frequency of sampling affect accuracy of water-quality monitoring , 1999 .

[7]  Forrest T. Izuno,et al.  TIME VERSUS FLOW COMPOSITE WATER SAMPLING FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES IN THE EVERGLADES AGRICULTURAL AREA , 1998 .

[8]  T. K. Tremwel,et al.  Geometrically Incremental Volume Sampling for Ephemeral Channel Pollutants , 1996 .

[9]  Robert B. Thomas,et al.  An evaluation of flow-stratified sampling for estimating suspended sediment loads , 1995 .

[10]  N. Peters Water-quality variations in a forested Piedmont catchment, Georgia, USA , 1994 .

[11]  D. Baker,et al.  Pesticide concentration patterns in agricultural drainage networks in the lake Erie Basin , 1993 .

[12]  U. C. Kothyari,et al.  Rainfall Intensity‐Duration‐Frequency Formula for India , 1992 .

[13]  D. Walling Erosion and sediment yield research — Some recent perspectives , 1988 .

[14]  R. K. Linsley,et al.  Flood Estimates: How Good Are They? , 1986 .

[15]  R. Ferguson River Loads Underestimated by Rating Curves , 1986 .

[16]  R. E. White,et al.  Automatic sampling of stream water during storm events in small remote catchments , 1982 .

[17]  B. Mar,et al.  Composite Sampling of Highway Runoff: Year 2 , 1980 .

[18]  R. J. Stevens,et al.  A comparison of discrete and intensive sampling for measuring the loads of nitrogen and phosphorus in the river main, County Antrim , 1978 .

[19]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Sampling Techniques, 3rd Edition , 1963 .

[20]  David M. Hershfield,et al.  Rainfall frequency atlas of the United States for durations from 30 minutes to 24 hours and return periods from 1 to 100 years , 1961 .