Molecular mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer.

Personalized cancer medicine based on the genetic milieu of individual colorectal tumors has long been postulated, but until recently this concept was not supported by clinical evidence. The advent of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) -targeted monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab has paved the way to the individualized treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here we discuss the evidence that mCRCs respond differently to EGFR-targeted agents and that the tumor-specific response has a genetic basis. We outline how, from the initial observation that cetuximab or panitumumab as monotherapy is effective only in 10% to 20% of mCRCs, knowledge has being gained on the molecular mechanisms underlying primary resistance to these agents. The role of oncogenic activation of EGFR downstream effectors such as KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and PTEN on response to therapy is discussed. We suggest that CRCs lacking oncogenic alterations in these four genes have the highest probability of response to anti-EGFR therapies and are defined as "quadruple negative." The rapid and effective translation of these findings into predictive biomarkers to couple EGFR-targeted antibodies to the patients who benefit from them is presented as a paradigm of modern clinical oncology. Finally, unresolved questions such as understanding the molecular basis of response as well the mechanisms of secondary resistance are presented as the future fundamental goals in this research field.

[1]  K. O'Byrne,et al.  Molecular and clinical predictors of outcome for cetuximab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Data from the FLEX study. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Linda Mol,et al.  Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Multi-Determinants Analysis of Molecular Alterations for Predicting Clinical Benefit to EGFR-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies in Colorectal Cancer , 2009, PloS one.

[4]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  6077 A meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies combining cetuximab with chemotherapy (CT) as 1st-line treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results according to KRAS and BRAF mutation status , 2009 .

[5]  J. Tabernero,et al.  10LBA Randomized phase 3 study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 compared to FOLFOX4 alone as 1st-line treatment (tx) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): the PRIME trial , 2009 .

[6]  F. Lordick,et al.  14LBA Randomized phase 3 study of panitumumab with FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) , 2009 .

[7]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  6079 Overall survival of patients with KRAS wild-type tumours treated with FOLFOX4± cetuximab as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: The OPUS study , 2009 .

[8]  N. Funel,et al.  PTEN expression and KRAS mutations on primary tumors and metastases in the prediction of benefit from cetuximab plus irinotecan for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. Balko,et al.  A gene expression predictor of response to EGFR-targeted therapy stratifies progression-free survival to cetuximab in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[10]  D. Lambrechts,et al.  PIK3CA Mutations Are Not a Major Determinant of Resistance to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  M. Somerfield,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  D. Lambrechts,et al.  PIK3CA mutations do not confer resistance to the EGFR-inhibitor cetuximab in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer , 2009 .

[13]  Francesca Molinari,et al.  PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with clinical resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. , 2009, Cancer research.

[14]  Seta Shahin,et al.  A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  K. Garber Trial offers early test case for personalized medicine. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  S. Andreola,et al.  PI3KCA/PTEN deregulation contributes to impaired responses to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  D. Zecchin,et al.  Replacement of normal with mutant alleles in the genome of normal human cells unveils mutation-specific drug responses , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Dongsheng Tu,et al.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  M. Choti,et al.  Urgent need for a new staging system in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  247 ORAL BRAF V600E confers resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab in metastatic colorectal cancer , 2008 .

[23]  F. Siannis,et al.  Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Clinical Usefulness of EGFR Gene Copy Number as a Predictive Marker in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Cetuximab: A Fluorescent In situ Hybridization Study , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  Daniel J. Freeman,et al.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Sanjay Goel,et al.  PIK3CA mutation/PTEN expression status predicts response of colon cancer cells to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab. , 2008, Cancer research.

[27]  G. Tortora,et al.  EGFR antagonists in cancer treatment. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Li Zhao,et al.  Helical domain and kinase domain mutations in p110α of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase induce gain of function by different mechanisms , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  A. Lièvre,et al.  KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  P. Jänne,et al.  EGFR FISH assay predicts for response to cetuximab in chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer patients. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[31]  Dongsheng Tu,et al.  Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  F. Cavalli,et al.  PTEN loss of expression predicts cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[33]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  Genetic knockouts and knockins in human somatic cells , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[34]  M. Moroni,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number and clinical outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  C. Hudis Trastuzumab--mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  G. Stamp,et al.  Binding of Ras to Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase p110α Is Required for Ras- Driven Tumorigenesis in Mice , 2007, Cell.

[37]  Manuel Hidalgo,et al.  Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  Silvia Benvenuti,et al.  Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. , 2007, Cancer research.

[39]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[40]  A. Lièvre,et al.  KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[41]  M. Moroni,et al.  Somatic mutation of EGFR catalytic domain and treatment with gefitinib in colorectal cancer. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[42]  E. Trimble,et al.  2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004). , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[43]  Silvia Benvenuti,et al.  Gene copy number for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and clinical response to antiEGFR treatment in colorectal cancer: a cohort study. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[44]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Cetuximab shows activity in colorectal cancer patients with tumors that do not express the epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemistry. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Somatic mutations of EGFR in colorectal cancers and glioblastomas. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  Armando Santoro,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  S. Gabriel,et al.  EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy , 2004, Science.

[48]  Patricia L. Harris,et al.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[49]  Neal J Meropol,et al.  Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[50]  M. Barbacid,et al.  RAS oncogenes: the first 30 years , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[51]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status , 2002, Nature.