Enhancement and summation in the perception of two successive vibrotactile stimuli

Enhancement and summation were found to be fundamentally different perceptual processes affecting the sensation magnitude of two successive vibrotactile stimuli. Enhancement, defined operationally as an increment in the subjective magnitude of one stimulus due to the presentation of a prior stimulus, and summation, defined as an increment in overall subjective magnitude of the two stimuli, were measured for sinusoidal vibration of the thenar eminence of the hand. The effect of summation was maximum when the two stimuli greatly differed in frequency, whereas maximum enhancement effects were found when both stimuli were close in frequency. The summation effect showed little decay as the interstimulus interval was increased to as much as 500 msec, whereas enhancement effects decayed to zero at approximately 500 msec. Results were similar to those obtained in comparable studies of audition and support the hypothesis that there are at least two distinct information-processing channels for the perception of cutaneous vibration.

[1]  S. S. Stevens The Measurement of Loudness , 1955 .

[2]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Critical Band Width in Loudness Summation , 1957 .

[3]  S. S. Stevens Tactile vibration: dynamics of sensory intensity. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  J. Zwislocki Theory of Temporal Auditory Summation , 1960 .

[5]  M SATO,et al.  Response of Pacinian corpuscles to sinusoidal vibration , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  C. Hunt,et al.  On the nature of vibration receptors in the hind limb of the cat , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. T. Verrillo TEMPORAL SUMMATION IN VIBROTACTILE SENSITIVITY. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  W. Loewenstein,et al.  Components of receptor adaptation in a Pacinian corpuscle , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  E. Zwicker,et al.  A MODEL OF LOUDNESS SUMMATION. , 1965, Psychological review.

[10]  R. T. Verrillo,et al.  Specificity of a cutaneous receptor , 1966 .

[11]  R. T. Verrillo,et al.  Vibrotactile sensitivity and the frequency response of the Pacinian corpuscle , 1966 .

[12]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  B. Scharf,et al.  Dichotic summation of loudness. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  A. Fraioli,et al.  Sensation magnitude of vibrotactile stimuli , 1969 .

[15]  Loudness Summation of Pairs of Short Sounds , 1970 .

[16]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Loudness effects in pairs of tone bursts , 1971 .

[17]  Loudness Enhancement and Summation in Pairs of Short Sound Bursts , 1972 .

[18]  N. Squires,et al.  Loudness enhancement following contralateral stimulation. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  R. Nodar,et al.  Loudness enhancement and summation in pairs or short sound bursts , 1974 .

[20]  On loudness enhancement of a tone burst by a preceding tone burst , 1974 .