Multiscale and multiresolution modeling of shales and their flow and morphological properties

The need for more accessible energy resources makes shale formations increasingly important. Characterization of such low-permeability formations is complicated, due to the presence of multiscale features, and defies conventional methods. High-quality 3D imaging may be an ultimate solution for revealing the complexities of such porous media, but acquiring them is costly and time consuming. High-quality 2D images, on the other hand, are widely available. A novel three-step, multiscale, multiresolution reconstruction method is presented that directly uses 2D images in order to develop 3D models of shales. It uses a high-resolution 2D image representing the small-scale features to reproduce the nanopores and their network, a large scale, low-resolution 2D image to create the larger-scale characteristics, and generates stochastic realizations of the porous formation. The method is used to develop a model for a shale system for which the full 3D image is available and its properties can be computed. The predictions of the reconstructed models are in excellent agreement with the data. The method is, however, quite general and can be used for reconstructing models of other important heterogeneous materials and media. Two biological examples and from materials science are also reconstructed to demonstrate the generality of the method.

[1]  J. Quiblier.  A new three-dimensional modeling technique for studying porous media , 1984 .

[2]  Schwartz,et al.  Grain consolidation and electrical conductivity in porous media. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[3]  David F. R. Mildner,et al.  Small‐angle scattering studies of the pore spaces of shaly rocks , 1986 .

[4]  Pierre M. Adler,et al.  Flow in simulated porous media , 1990 .

[5]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[6]  Bryant,et al.  Prediction of relative permeability in simple porous media. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[7]  J. Kärger,et al.  Flow and Transport in Porous Media and Fractured Rock , 1996 .

[8]  Anthony Roberts.  Statistical reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media from two-dimensional images , 1997 .

[9]  Ioannidis,et al.  On the Geometry and Topology of 3D Stochastic Porous Media. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[10]  Eustathios S. Kikkinides,et al.  Adsorption and diffusion in nanoporous materials from stochastic and process-based reconstruction techniques , 2002 .

[11]  Dominik Endres,et al.  A new metric for probability distributions , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Andre G. Journel,et al.  Spatial Connectivity: From Variograms to Multiple-Point Measures , 2003 .

[13]  C.A.J. Appelo,et al.  FLOW AND TRANSPORT , 2004 .

[14]  F. Javadpour,et al.  Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments , 2007 .

[15]  M. Blunt,et al.  Pore space reconstruction of vuggy carbonates using microtomography and multiple‐point statistics , 2007 .

[16]  F. Javadpour.  Nanopores and Apparent Permeability of Gas Flow in Mudrocks (Shales and Siltstone) , 2009 .

[17]  R. Slatt,et al.  Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales: Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks , 2011 .

[18]  Alan R. Butcher,et al.  FIB/SEM and SEM/EDX: a New Dawn for the SEM in the Core Lab? , 2011 .

[19]  Farzam Javadpour,et al.  Gas flow in ultra-tight shale strata , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  R. Grande,et al.  Does the casting mode influence microstructure, fracture and properties of different metal ceramic alloys? , 2012, Brazilian oral research.

[21]  Farzam Javadpour,et al.  Atomic-Force Microscopy: A New Tool for Gas-Shale Characterization , 2012 .

[22]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Multiple-point geostatistical modeling based on the cross-correlation functions , 2012, Computational Geosciences.

[23]  Stephen C. Ruppel,et al.  Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores , 2012 .

[24]  B. Hart,et al.  Mudstone (“shale”) depositional and diagenetic processes: Implications for seismic analyses of source-rock reservoirs , 2013 .

[25]  Carlos E. Molinares-Blanco,et al.  Pores, Spores, Pollen and Pellets: Small, but Significant Constituents of Resource Shales , 2013 .

[26]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  Measurement of gas storage processes in shale and of the molecular diffusion coefficient in kerogen , 2014 .

[27]  R. Slatt,et al.  Variations in Shale Pore Types and Their Measurement , 2014 .

[28]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Reconstruction of nonstationary disordered materials and media: Watershed transform and cross-correlation function. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  W. Tao,et al.  Nanoscale simulation of shale transport properties using the lattice Boltzmann method: permeability and diffusivity , 2014, Scientific reports.

[30]  M. E. Naraghi,et al.  A stochastic permeability model for the shale-gas systems , 2015 .

[31]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Geostatistical Simulation and Reconstruction of Porous Media by a Cross-Correlation Function and Integration of Hard and Soft Data , 2015, Transport in Porous Media.