The CTSA as an Exemplar Framework for Developing Multidisciplinary Translational Teams

Translational science requires that scientists from multiple disciplines work together to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of human disease. Although a literature exists on the design and management of multidisciplinary teams, little has been written on multidisciplinary translational teams (MTTs). MTTs are distinct hybrid entities, with goals taken from both industry and academic models. We identified 30 design factors in 10 domains from a literature survey relevant to our MTT model: specific goals, structures, and processes. These dimensions were adapted to our own institutional environment in the selection and management of 11 MTTs that exploited resources of University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Clinical and Translational Sciences Awards (CTSA). Case illustrations of two specific MTTs illustrate some of the challenges encountered and opportunities realized in terms of education and scientific advances. Network depiction of disciplinarity indicated that CTSA KRs and CTSA leadership contributed to discipline diversity especially in small (or nascent) MTTs. A separate depiction of MTT‐KR utilization indicated that data analysis, translational technologies, and novel methods were heavily utilized by MTTs, whereas other KRs contributed significant effort to infrastructure development. We conclude that the CTSA can provide a rich 
infrastructural framework and scientific environment for the development of successful MTTs. Clin Trans Sci 2013; Volume 6: 60–71

[1]  Mario Castro,et al.  Predicting Intermediate Phenotypes in Asthma Using Bronchoalveolar Lavage‐Derived Cytokines , 2010, Clinical and translational science.

[2]  Felicia G. Lassk,et al.  Antecedents of Team Creativity: An Examination of Team Emotional Intelligence, Team Trust and Collaborative Culture , 2010 .

[3]  Katy Börner,et al.  Advancing the Science of Team Science , 2010, Clinical and translational science.

[4]  D B McGuire Building and maintaining an interdisciplinary research team. , 1999, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[5]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[6]  D. Fay,et al.  Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi-sample study of team innovation in health care , 2006 .

[7]  K. Wade,et al.  Practice-Based Research , 2007, Social work in health care.

[8]  Howard Gadlin,et al.  Collaboration & team science: a field guide , 2013 .

[9]  Hans-Jörg Bullinger,et al.  Rapid product development—an overview , 2000 .

[10]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Theories of Small Groups: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. , 2005 .

[11]  Sze-Sze Wong,et al.  Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Stephen B. Johnson,et al.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. , 2003, JAMA.

[13]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[14]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[15]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Impact of Cross-Training on Team Functioning: An Empirical Investigation , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[16]  S. Woolf The meaning of translational research and why it matters. , 2008, JAMA.

[17]  Kara L Hall,et al.  The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[18]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  The Effect of Team Building on Performance , 1999 .

[19]  D. Rubio,et al.  Defining Translational Research: Implications for Training , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[20]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[21]  Suresh K. Bhavnani,et al.  How cytokines co-occur across asthma patients: From bipartite network analysis to a molecular-based classification , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[22]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  M. Jamieson,et al.  Team effectiveness in academic primary health care teams , 2008, Journal of interprofessional care.

[24]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[25]  Cathleen Kane,et al.  Evaluating Translational Research: A Process Marker Model , 2011, Clinical and translational science.

[26]  M. Buljac-Samardžić,et al.  Interventions to improve team effectiveness: a systematic review. , 2010, Health policy.

[27]  Mary Jane Koren,et al.  Translating research into practice: transitional care for older adults. , 2009, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[28]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  B. B. Morgan,et al.  An Analysis of Team Evolution and Maturation , 1993 .

[30]  E. Salas,et al.  Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. , 1992 .

[31]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. , 2007, Health services research.

[32]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  A. Hausladen,et al.  Host S-nitrosylation inhibits clostridial small molecule–activated glucosylating toxins , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[34]  Steve Hinkle,et al.  Theories of Small Groups: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. , 2004 .

[35]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Divergent and Convergent Idea Generation in Teams: A Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication , 2004 .

[36]  R. Wageman How Leaders Foster Self-Managing Team Effectiveness: Design Choices Versus Hands-on Coaching , 2001 .

[37]  M A Schnitker,et al.  THE AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH. , 1942, Science.

[38]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA , 2008 .

[39]  C. Savelsbergh,et al.  The Development and Empirical Validation of a Multidimensional Measurement Instrument for Team Learning Behaviors , 2009 .

[40]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[41]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Fostering Innovation in Complex Product Development Settings: The Role of Team Member Identity and Interteam Interdependence* , 2010 .

[42]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[43]  L. Lemieux-Charles,et al.  What Do We Know about Health Care Team Effectiveness? A Review of the Literature , 2006, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[44]  J. Westfall,et al.  Practice-based research--"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. , 2007, JAMA.

[45]  Robert R. Hirschfeld,et al.  Becoming team players: team members' mastery of teamwork knowledge as a predictor of team task proficiency and observed teamwork effectiveness. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  B. Cheng,et al.  Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness , 2008 .

[47]  R. Golembiewski Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[48]  M. Körner Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: a comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team approach , 2010, Clinical rehabilitation.

[49]  John T. Slattery,et al.  The Road We Must Take: Multidisciplinary Team Science , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[50]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Traces, trajectories, and timing: The temporal perspective on groups , 2005 .

[51]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[52]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: a role composition model of team performance. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[54]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[55]  Kara L Hall,et al.  Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[56]  Regina C. McNally,et al.  Your New Product Development (NPD) is Only as Good as Your Process: An Exploratory Analysis of New NPD Process Design and Implementation , 2007 .

[57]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation , 2003 .

[58]  W. Calhoun,et al.  The Role of Method Intuition in Translational Ethics , 2008 .

[59]  Katy Börner,et al.  A Multi-Level Systems Perspective for the Science of Team Science , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[60]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[61]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[62]  T. Elkins,et al.  Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework , 2003 .

[63]  J. Veijola,et al.  How should a scientific team be effectively formed and managed , 2002, Nordic journal of psychiatry.

[64]  S. Fiore Interdisciplinarity as Teamwork , 2008 .

[65]  Bernard C. K. Choi,et al.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. , 2007, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[66]  Kara L Hall,et al.  Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[67]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[68]  N. Petrelli,et al.  The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[69]  Mario Castro,et al.  Molecular phenotyping of severe asthma using pattern recognition of bronchoalveolar lavage-derived cytokines. , 2008, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[70]  D. L. Gladstein Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[71]  Haifa F. Sun,et al.  The effect of researchers' interdisciplinary characteristics on team innovation performance: evidence from university R&D teams in China , 2010 .

[72]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .