Modeling, mutagenesis, and structural studies on the fully conserved phosphate‐binding loop (Loop 8) of triosephosphate isomerase: Toward a new substrate specificity

Loop 8 (residues 232–242) in triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) is a highly conserved loop that forms a tight binding pocket for the phosphate moiety of the substrate. Its sequence includes the fully conserved, solvent‐exposed Leu238. The tight phosphate‐binding pocket explains the high substrate specificity of TIM being limited to the in vivo substrates dihydroxyacetone‐phosphate and D‐glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate. Here we use the monomeric variant of trypanosomal TIM for exploring the structural consequences of shortening this loop. The mutagenesis, guided by extensive modeling calculations and followed up by crystallographic characterization, is aimed at widening the phosphate‐binding pocket and, consequently, changing the substrate specificity. Two new variants were characterized. The crystal structures of these variants indicate that in monomeric forms of TIM, the Leu238 side‐chain is nicely buried in a hydrophobic cluster. Monomeric forms of wild‐type dimeric TIM are known to exist transiently as folding intermediates; our structural analysis suggests that in this monomeric form, Leu238 of loop 8 also adopts this completely buried conformation, which explains its full conservation across the evolution. The much wider phosphate‐binding pocket of the new variant allows for the development of a new TIM variant with a different substrate specificity. Proteins 2001;42:383–389. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  W G Hol,et al.  Three hTIM mutants that provide new insights on why TIM is a dimer. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[3]  J. Knowles,et al.  Enzyme catalysis: not different, just better , 1991, Nature.

[4]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[5]  L. Wyns,et al.  Triose-phosphate isomerase (TIM) of the psychrophilic bacterium Vibrio marinus. Kinetic and structural properties. , 1998, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  N. Thanki,et al.  Active site properties of monomeric triosephosphate isomerase (monoTIM) as deduced from mutational and structural studies , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  Takashi Takagi An α/gb-barrel full of evolutionary trouble , 1993 .

[8]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Protein engineering with monomeric triosephosphate isomerase (monoTIM): the modelling and structure verification of a seven-residue loop. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[9]  J. Knowles,et al.  Segmental movement: definition of the structural requirements for loop closure in catalysis by triosephosphate isomerase. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[10]  J. Knowles,et al.  Stabilization of a reaction intermediate as a catalytic device: definition of the functional role of the flexible loop in triosephosphate isomerase. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[11]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Directed evolution of new catalytic activity using the α/β-barrel scaffold , 2000, Nature.

[12]  J. Nielsen,et al.  The ionization of a buried glutamic acid is thermodynamically linked to the stability of Leishmania mexicana triose phosphate isomerase. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[13]  A. Shrake,et al.  Ligand-induced biphasic protein denaturation. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  S. Ferreira,et al.  Kinetics and energetics of subunit dissociation/unfolding of TIM: the importance of oligomerization for conformational persistence and chemical stability of proteins. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[15]  M. Noble,et al.  Structures of the “open” and “closed” state of trypanosomal triosephosphate isomerase, as observed in a new crystal form: Implications for the reaction mechanism , 1993, Proteins.

[16]  M. Noble,et al.  Comparison of the refined crystal structures of liganded and unliganded chicken, yeast and trypanosomal triosephosphate isomerase. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  F. Opperdoes,et al.  Kinetic properties of triose-phosphate isomerase from Trypanosoma brucei brucei. A comparison with the rabbit muscle and yeast enzymes. , 1987, European journal of biochemistry.

[18]  H. W. Hellinga,et al.  Computational protein engineering , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  J. Hiltunen,et al.  Crystallization experiments with 2-enoyl-CoA hydratase, using an automated 'fast-screening' crystallization protocol. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[20]  Michael L. Connolly,et al.  Computation of molecular volume , 1985 .

[21]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[22]  G. Farber An α/β-barrel full of evolutionary trouble , 1993 .

[23]  J. Navaza,et al.  AMoRe: an automated package for molecular replacement , 1994 .

[24]  L. Regan Protein redesign. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[25]  J M Blackburn,et al.  Directed evolution of new catalytic activity using the alpha/beta-barrel scaffold. , 2000, Nature.

[26]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  M Karplus,et al.  Anatomy of a conformational change: hinged "lid" motion of the triosephosphate isomerase loop. , 1990, Science.

[28]  J. Knowles,et al.  Segmental motion in catalysis: investigation of a hydrogen bond critical for loop closure in the reaction of triosephosphate isomerase. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[29]  R. Mariuzza,et al.  Luxury accommodations: the expanding role of structural plasticity in protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Structure.

[30]  R. Jaenicke,et al.  Folding and Association of Triose Phosphate Isomerase from Rabbit Muscle , 1980, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[31]  R Abagyan,et al.  Three new crystal structures of point mutation variants of monoTIM: conformational flexibility of loop-1, loop-4 and loop-8. , 1995, Structure.

[32]  G Vriend,et al.  Refined 1.83 A structure of trypanosomal triosephosphate isomerase crystallized in the presence of 2.4 M-ammonium sulphate. A comparison with the structure of the trypanosomal triosephosphate isomerase-glycerol-3-phosphate complex. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.