Providing signal priority for buses has been proposed as an inexpensive way to improve transit efficiency, productivity and reduce operation costs [1]. Bus signal priority has been implemented in several US cities to improve schedule adherence, reduce transit operation costs, and improve customer ride quality [2]. Current signal priority strategies implemented in various US cities mostly utilize sensors to detect buses at a fixed or preset distance away from an intersection. Traditional presence detection systems, ideally designed for emergency vehicles, usually send signal priority request after a preprogrammed time offset as soon as transit vehicles were detected without the consideration of bus readiness. The objective of this study is to take advantage of the already equipped GPS/AVL system on the buses in Minneapolis and develop an adaptive signal priority strategy that could consider the bus schedule adherence, its number of passengers, location and speed. Buses can communicate with intersection signal controllers using wireless technology to request signal priority. Communication with the roadside unit (e.g., traffic controller) for signal priority may be established using the readily available 802.11x WLAN or the DSRC (Dedicated Short Range Communication) 802.11p protocol currently under development for wireless access to and from the vehicular environment. This paper describes our proposed priority logic, and its evaluation using microscopic traffic simulation. Simulation results indicate that a 12-15% reduction in bus travel time during AM peak hours (7AM-9AM) and 4-11% reduction in PM peak hours (4PM-6PM) could be achieved by providing signal priority for buses. Average bus delay time was reduced in the range of 16-20% and 5-14% during AM and PM peak periods, respectively.
[1]
Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.
An Approach Towards the Integration of Bus Priority, Traffic Adaptive Signal Control, and Bus Information/Scheduling Systems
,
2001
.
[2]
R. J. Baker,et al.
AN OVERVIEW OF TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY
,
2002
.
[3]
Nick Hounsell,et al.
Bus Priority at Traffic Signals—Evaluating Strategy Options
,
2003
.
[4]
Laurence R. Rilett,et al.
Improved Transit Signal Priority System for Networks with Nearside Bus Stops
,
2005
.
[5]
Peter G Furth,et al.
Conditional Bus Priority at Signalized Intersections: Better Service with Less Traffic Disruption
,
2000
.
[6]
David T Crout.
Evaluation of Transit Signal Priority at the Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet)
,
2005
.
[7]
Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.
A REAL-TIME TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM: ARCHITECTURE, ALGORITHMS, AND ANALYSIS
,
2001
.
[8]
Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.
Integrated Transit Priority and Rail/Emergency Preemption in Real-Time Traffic Adaptive Signal Control
,
2004,
J. Intell. Transp. Syst..
[9]
Nick Hounsell,et al.
Public transport priority in SCOOT
,
1996
.
[10]
Alexander Skabardonis,et al.
A DYNAMIC MODEL FOR ADAPTIVE BUS SIGNAL PRIORITY
,
2003
.
[11]
Panos G Michalopoulos,et al.
Practical Procedure for Calibrating Microscopic Traffic Simulation Models
,
2003
.
[12]
Alexander Skabardonis,et al.
Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software
,
2004
.