Impact of Carbon Regulations on the Supply Chain With Carbon Reduction Effort

Regarding carbon emission as a principal cause of global warming, governments begin to take note of the urgency of emission reduction and propose feasible carbon regulations. Consumers also become more caring about the carbon emission factor when purchasing product. In response, the firms have exerted considerable efforts to reduce their emissions. In this paper, we investigate a supply chain facing carbon-sensitive demand market. Two major carbon regulations, absolute-cap (AC) and intensity-cap (IC), are considered. We explore the optimization problems for the centralized and decentralized models, and derive the optimal solutions for the production quantity as well as the emission reduction effort. We find that under regulation IC, a higher emission cap will lower the carbon emission of unit product but raise the total production quantity, while the emission cap is irrelevant to these operational decisions under regulation AC. In addition, the production quantity and the emission reduction effort under regulation AC are lower than those under regulation IC. We further show double marginalization within this supply chain manifests as not only a lower production quantity but also a higher unit carbon emission. Finally, numerical experiments are conducted to obtain more insights.

[1]  D. Konur,et al.  Joint decisions on inventory replenishment and emission reduction investment under different emission regulations , 2014 .

[2]  D. Konur,et al.  Integrated inventory control and transportation decisions under carbon emissions regulations: LTL vs. TL carriers , 2014 .

[3]  Jingjing Jiang,et al.  The construction of Shenzhen׳s carbon emission trading scheme , 2014 .

[4]  Janat Shah,et al.  A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures , 2012 .

[5]  Xiaohang Yue,et al.  Effects of Carbon Emission Taxes on Transportation Mode Selections and Social Welfare , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[6]  Klaus Conrad,et al.  Price Competition and Product Differentiation When Consumers Care for the Environment , 2005 .

[7]  Mark S. Daskin,et al.  Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains: Insights From Simple Models , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[8]  William Dean Interactions among market mechanisms for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in California , 2016 .

[9]  Stefan Spinler,et al.  Sustainable Operations Management: An Enduring Stream or a Passing Fancy? , 2013 .

[10]  Dmitry Krass,et al.  Environmental Taxes and the Choice of Green Technology , 2013 .

[11]  Louis Y.Y. Lu,et al.  Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis , 2007 .

[12]  Bin Shen,et al.  The Coordination of Fashion Supply Chains With a Risk-Averse Supplier Under the Markdown Money Policy , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[13]  Gabriel Alves,et al.  Strategic and Tactical Evaluation of Conflicting Environment and Business Goals in Green Supply Chains , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[14]  M. Jaber,et al.  Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives , 2013 .

[15]  Gérard P. Cachon Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts , 2003, Supply Chain Management.

[16]  Zugang Liu,et al.  Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Bruno Agard,et al.  Environmental constraints in joint product and supply chain design optimization , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[18]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism , 2013 .

[19]  Xiaoyan Xu,et al.  Allocation of product-related carbon emission abatement target in a make-to-order supply chain , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[20]  P. He,et al.  Production lot-sizing and carbon emissions under cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations , 2015 .

[21]  Sanjeev Swami,et al.  Channel coordination in green supply chain management , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[22]  Cheryl T. Druehl,et al.  Design for the Environment: Life‐Cycle Approach Using a Newsvendor Model , 2013 .

[23]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Double Marginalization in Performance-Based Advertising: Implications and Solutions , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[24]  S. Chuanmin,et al.  Consumer behaviour on low-carbon agri-food purchase: a carbon labelling experimental study in China , 2018 .

[25]  G. Grolleau,et al.  Can Ecolabeling Schemes Preserve the Environment? , 2008 .

[26]  Mingming Leng,et al.  Analysis of the Single-Period Problem under Carbon Emissions Policies , 2012 .

[27]  J. Zhang,et al.  Game-theoretic analysis for an emission-dependent supply chain in a ‘cap-and-trade’ system , 2011, Annals of Operations Research.

[28]  Gilbert E. Metcalf,et al.  Market-Based Policy Options to Control U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2009 .

[29]  Shaofu Du,et al.  Game-theoretical analysis for supply chain with consumer preference to low carbon , 2015 .

[30]  T. Cheng,et al.  Managing carbon footprints in inventory management , 2011 .

[31]  Jim Yates,et al.  Customer Response to Carbon Labelling of Groceries , 2011 .

[32]  Richard Tay,et al.  Consumer preferences and policy implications for the green car market , 2016 .