Cophylogeny of the anther smut fungi and their caryophyllaceous hosts: Prevalence of host shifts and importance of delimiting parasite species for inferring cospeciation

BackgroundUsing phylogenetic approaches, the expectation that parallel cladogenesis should occur between parasites and hosts has been validated in some studies, but most others provided evidence for frequent host shifts. Here we examine the evolutionary history of the association between Microbotryum fungi that cause anther smut disease and their Caryophyllaceous hosts. We investigated the congruence between host and parasite phylogenies, inferred cospeciation events and host shifts, and assessed whether geography or plant ecology could have facilitated the putative host shifts identified.For cophylogeny analyses on microorganisms, parasite strains isolated from different host species are generally considered to represent independent evolutionary lineages, often without checking whether some strains actually belong to the same generalist species. Such an approach may mistake intraspecific nodes for speciation events and thus bias the results of cophylogeny analyses if generalist species are found on closely related hosts. A second aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the impact of species delimitation on the inferences of cospeciation.ResultsWe inferred a multiple gene phylogeny of anther smut strains from 21 host plants from several geographic origins, complementing a previous study on the delimitation of fungal species and their host specificities. We also inferred a multi-gene phylogeny of their host plants, and the two phylogenies were compared. A significant level of cospeciation was found when each host species was considered to harbour a specific parasite strain, i.e. when generalist parasite species were not recognized as such. This approach overestimated the frequency of cocladogenesis because individual parasite species capable of infecting multiple host species (i.e. generalists) were found on closely related hosts. When generalist parasite species were appropriately delimited and only a single representative of each species was retained, cospeciation events were not more frequent than expected under a random distribution, and many host shifts were inferred.Current geographic distributions of host species seemed to be of little relevance for understanding the putative historical host shifts, because most fungal species had overlapping geographic ranges. We did detect some ecological similarities, including shared pollinators and habitat types, between host species that were diseased by closely related anther smut species. Overall, genetic similarity underlying the host-parasite interactions appeared to have the most important influence on specialization and host-shifts: generalist multi-host parasite species were found on closely related plant species, and related species in the Microbotryum phylogeny were associated with members of the same host clade.ConclusionWe showed here that Microbotryum species have evolved through frequent host shifts to moderately distant hosts, and we show further that accurate delimitation of parasite species is essential for interpreting cophylogeny studies.

[1]  M. Hood,et al.  Karyotypic similarity identifies multiple host-shifts of a pathogenic fungus in natural populations. , 2003, Infection, Genetics and Evolution.

[2]  C. Richards,et al.  Relative effects of nocturnal vs diurnal pollinators and distance on gene flow in small Silene alba populations. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[3]  T. Giraud,et al.  Isolation of 44 polymorphic microsatellite loci in three host races of the phytopathogenic fungus Microbotryum violaceum , 2002 .

[4]  T Giraud,et al.  When can host shifts produce congruent host and parasite phylogenies? A simulation approach , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[5]  A. D. Gordon,et al.  Obtaining common pruned trees , 1985 .

[6]  H. Godfray,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF HOST-PLANT USE IN A GENUS OF LEAF-MINING MOTHS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  Roderic D. M. Page,et al.  PARALLEL PHYLOGENIES: RECONSTRUCTING THE HISTORY OF HOST‐PARASITE ASSEMBLAGES , 1994 .

[8]  Makoto Kato,et al.  COSPECIATION ANALYSIS OF AN OBLIGATE POLLINATION MUTUALISM: HAVEGLOCHIDION TREES (EUPHORBIACEAE) AND POLLINATING EPICEPHALA MOTHS(GRACILLARIIDAE) DIVERSIFIED IN PARALLEL? , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  A. Jackson,et al.  A RECONCILIATION ANALYSIS OF HOST SWITCHING IN PLANT‐FUNGAL SYMBIOSES , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  M. Pettersson,et al.  Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations : option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris , 1991 .

[11]  Fredrik Ronquist,et al.  RECONSTRUCTING THE HISTORY OF HOST‐PARASITE ASSOCIATIONS USING GENERALISED PARSIMONY , 1995, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[12]  F. Volckaert,et al.  Comparing host and parasite phylogenies: gyrodactylus flatworms jumping from goby to goby. , 2005, Systematic biology.

[13]  R. Page,et al.  Molecular phylogenies and host-parasite cospeciation: gophers and lice as a model system. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  T Giraud,et al.  Speciation: Selection against migrant pathogens: the immigrant inviability barrier in pathogens , 2006, Heredity.

[15]  Gi-Ho Sung,et al.  Ancient Tripartite Coevolution in the Attine Ant-Microbe Symbiosis , 2003, Science.

[16]  M. Perlin Pathovars or Formae speciales of Microbotryum violaceum Differ in Electrophoretic Karyotype , 1996, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[17]  A. Widmer,et al.  Molecular evidence for allopolyploid speciation and a single origin of the narrow endemic Draba ladina (Brassicaceae). , 1999, American journal of botany.

[18]  R. Page,et al.  When do parasites fail to speciate in response to host speciation? , 2003, Systematic biology.

[19]  R. Page,et al.  Trees within trees: phylogeny and historical associations. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  B. Roy,et al.  PATTERNS OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CRUCIFERS AND THEIR FLOWER‐MIMIC PATHOGENS: HOST JUMPS ARE MORE COMMON THAN COEVOLUTION OR COSPECIATION , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software , 2001, Bioinform..

[22]  M. Hood,et al.  The Ecology and Genetics of a Host Shift: Microbotryum as a Model System , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[23]  E. Garber,et al.  Transmission genetics of Microbotryum violaceum (Ustilago violacea): a case history. , 2002, Advances in applied microbiology.

[24]  Olivier C. Martin,et al.  A congruence index for testing topological similarity between trees , 2007, Bioinform..

[25]  D. Downie,et al.  Phylogenetic congruence of mealybugs and their primary endosymbionts , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[26]  F. K. Barker,et al.  The utility of the incongruence length difference test. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[27]  A. Erhardt,et al.  Pollination crisis in the butterfly-pollinated wild carnation Dianthus carthusianorum? , 2006, The New phytologist.

[28]  P. V. van Tienderen,et al.  EVOLUTION OF GENERALISTS AND SPECIALISTS IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  A. Biere,et al.  Plant life-history and disease susceptibility - the occurrence of Ustilago violacea on different species within the Caryophyllaceae , 1993 .

[30]  U. Mueller,et al.  Complex host-pathogen coevolution in the Apterostigma fungus-growing ant-microbe symbiosis , 2006, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[31]  J. Jaenike,et al.  INFECTION SUCCESS IN NOVEL HOSTS: AN EXPERIMENTAL AND PHYLOGENETIC STUDY OF DROSOPHILA-PARASITIC NEMATODES , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  T. Giraud,et al.  The anther smut disease on Gypsophila repens: a case of parasite sub‐optimal performance following a recent host shift? , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[33]  J. Liro Die Ustilagineen Finnlands , 1924 .

[34]  B. Oxelman,et al.  Evolution of a RNA polymerase gene family in Silene (Caryophyllaceae)-incomplete concerted evolution and topological congruence among paralogues. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[35]  M. Macphail,et al.  A Middle-Late Eocene inflorescence of Caryophyllaceae from Tasmania, Australia. , 2003, American journal of botany.

[36]  C. Rueffler,et al.  Natural enemies and sex: how seed predators and pathogens contribute to sex-differential reproductive success in a gynodioecious plant , 2002, Oecologia.

[37]  J. Shykoff,et al.  Differences in population structure of the anther smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum on two closely related host species, Silene latifolia and S. dioica , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[38]  S. Takamatsu,et al.  Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the maple powdery mildew (Sawadaea, Erysiphaceae) inferred from nuclear rDNA sequences. , 2005, Mycological research.

[39]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[40]  D. Six,et al.  Phylogenetic comparison of ascomycete mycangial fungi and Dendroctonus bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) , 1999 .

[41]  T. Kawecki Red Queen Meets Santa Rosalia: Arms Races and the Evolution of Host Specialization in Organisms with Parasitic Lifestyles , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[42]  K. Jakobsen,et al.  Molecular phylogeny and evolution of Monilinia (Sclerotiniaceae) based on coding and noncoding rDNA sequences. , 1997, American journal of botany.

[43]  David Posada,et al.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..

[44]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[45]  Read,et al.  What makes a specialist special? , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[47]  Mathieu Fourment,et al.  PATRISTIC: a program for calculating patristic distances and graphically comparing the components of genetic change , 2006, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[48]  J. Shykoff,et al.  Genetic Isolation among Host Races of the Anther Smut Fungus Microbotryum violaceum on Three Host Plant Species , 1999, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[49]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Pollination and seed predation by moths on Silene and allied Caryophyllaceae: evaluating a model system to study the evolution of mutualisms. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[50]  Jaa Nylander,et al.  MrModeltest 2.2. Program Distributed by the Author , 2004 .

[51]  T. Giraud,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC EVIDENCE OF HOST-SPECIFIC CRYPTIC SPECIES IN THE ANTHER SMUT FUNGUS , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[52]  C. Bult,et al.  TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE , 1994 .

[53]  K. Vánky The genus Microbotryum (smut fungi) , 1998 .

[54]  D. Swofford PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[55]  P. V. Tienderen,et al.  EVOLUTION OF GENERALISTS AND SPECIALISTS IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS. , 1991 .

[56]  B. LePage,et al.  The Fossil Fungi of the Princeton Chert , 1994, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[57]  Bengt Oxelman,et al.  Origin and evolution of North American polyploid Silene (Caryophyllaceae). , 2007, American journal of botany.

[58]  T. Giraud,et al.  Speciation in fungi. , 2008, Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B.

[59]  B. Oxelman,et al.  A revised generic classification of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae) (vol 20, pg 513, 2000) , 2000 .

[60]  Masami Hasegawa,et al.  CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection , 2001, Bioinform..

[61]  H. G. Baker Infection of Species of Melandrium by Ustilaǵo violacea (Pers.) Fuckel and the Transmission of the Resultant Disease , 1947 .

[62]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  A statistical test for host-parasite coevolution. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[63]  T. Giraud,et al.  Importance of the life cycle in sympatric host race formation and speciation of pathogens. , 2006, Phytopathology.

[64]  T. Giraud,et al.  EVOLUTION OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION WITHIN A PARASITIC FUNGAL SPECIES COMPLEX , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[65]  A. Jürgens,et al.  Reproduction and Pollination in Central European Populations of Silene and Saponaria Species , 1996 .

[66]  R. Palma,et al.  Cophylogenetic relationships between penguins and their chewing lice , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[67]  P. Gouyon,et al.  Evolution of reproductive systems in the genus Silene , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[68]  L. Minuto,et al.  Molecular phylogeny of the Caryophyllaceae (Caryophyllales) inferred from chloroplast matK and nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[69]  M. P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .

[70]  M. Göker,et al.  Implications of molecular characters for the phylogeny of the Microbotryaceae (Basidiomycota: Urediniomycetes) , 2006, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[71]  J. Veevers Gondwanaland from 650–500 Ma assembly through 320 Ma merger in Pangea to 185–100 Ma breakup: supercontinental tectonics via stratigraphy and radiometric dating , 2004 .