A finite element model of knee electrical bioimpedance for facilitating edema quantification

Electrical bioimpedance (EBI) is a non-invasive technique for quantifying the composition of biological tissue. Recent work has shown empirically that vector EBI measurements can potentially be used to assess knee health after acute injury: edema leads to decreased local tissue resistance and injury to cell membranes increases local reactance. However, there is a need to better understand the underlying factors that can affect knee EBI measures, including parameters associated with the injury (e.g., location, severity), measurement (e.g., electrode placement, frequency), and environment (e.g., ambient temperature). In this paper, we present a subject-specific finite element method (FEM) model of a human knee with edema, with a preliminary investigation of these underlying factors that can affect EBI measures. Two shapes are considered for the knee and contrasted: a cylinder and a truncated cone. These models allow us to perform initial analyses to determine the effects of edema volume on EBI changes. Additionally, the models are compared with experimental results from subjects with acute knee injury using a system our group has previously developed and tested for high-resolution EBI measurements.

[1]  P. Dieppe,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: a method of measuring response to intra-articular treatments , 1997, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  Omer T. Inan,et al.  A Robust System for Longitudinal Knee Joint Edema and Blood Flow Assessment Based on Vector Bioimpedance Measurements , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[3]  M. Hutchens,et al.  Evaluation of patients presenting with knee pain: Part I. History, physical examination, radiographs, and laboratory tests. , 2003, American family physician.

[4]  L Nescolarde,et al.  Localized bioimpedance to assess muscle injury , 2013, Physiological measurement.

[5]  S B Heymsfield,et al.  Bioimpedance analysis: evaluation of leg-to-leg system based on pressure contact footpad electrodes. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  Sarah K Fields,et al.  Epidemiology of 6.6 million knee injuries presenting to United States emergency departments from 1999 through 2008. , 2012, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[7]  F. Guilak,et al.  MRI-based characterization of bone anatomy in the human knee for size matching of a medial meniscal implant. , 2010, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  J H Keyak,et al.  Individuals with patellofemoral pain exhibit greater patellofemoral joint stress: a finite element analysis study. , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[9]  B. Jolles,et al.  Bioimpedance for oedema evaluation after total knee arthroplasty. , 2013, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[10]  Eduardo Borba Neves,et al.  Knee bioelectric impedance assessment in healthy/with osteoarthritis subjects , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[11]  Nitin Kumar Sahu,et al.  A Review of Use FEM Techniques in Modeling of Human Knee Joint , 2016 .

[12]  Mohamed Samir Hefzy,et al.  Review of Knee Models , 1988 .

[13]  J. Kruczyński,et al.  Ultrasound of the knee. , 2011, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[14]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  R. P. Csintalan,et al.  The influence of tibial and femoral rotation on patellofemoral contact area and pressure. , 2003, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[16]  L Nescolarde,et al.  Effects of muscle injury severity on localized bioimpedance measurements , 2015, Physiological measurement.