Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change

Ensembles of coupled atmosphere–ocean global circulation model simulations are required to make probabilistic predictions of future climate change. “Perturbed physics” ensembles provide a new approach in which modelling uncertainties are sampled systematically by perturbing uncertain parameters. The aim is to provide a basis for probabilistic predictions in which the impact of prior assumptions and observational constraints can be clearly distinguished. Here we report on the first perturbed physics coupled atmosphere–ocean model ensemble in which poorly constrained atmosphere, land and sea-ice component parameters are varied in the third version of the Hadley Centre model (the variation of ocean parameters will be the subject of future study). Flux adjustments are employed, both to reduce regional sea surface temperature (SST) and salinity biases and also to admit the use of combinations of model parameter values which give non-zero values for the global radiation balance. This improves the extent to which the ensemble provides a credible basis for the quantification of uncertainties in climate change, especially at a regional level. However, this particular implementation of flux-adjustments leads to a weakening of the Atlantic overturning circulation, resulting in the development of biases in SST and sea ice in the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans. Nevertheless, model versions are produced which are of similar quality to the unperturbed and un-flux-adjusted version. The ensemble is used to simulate pre-industrial conditions and a simple scenario of a 1% per year compounded increase in CO2. The range of transient climate response (the 20 year averaged global warming at the time of CO2 doubling) is 1.5–2.6°C, similar to that found in multi-model studies. Measures of global and large scale climate change from the coupled models show simple relationships with associated measures computed from atmosphere-mixed-layer-ocean climate change experiments, suggesting that recent advances in computing the probability density function of climate change under equilibrium conditions using the perturbed physics approach may be extended to the transient case.

[1]  Carl Wunsch,et al.  An estimate of global ocean circulation and heat fluxes , 1996, Nature.

[2]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The time‐dependence of climate sensitivity , 2000 .

[3]  Michael E. Schlesinger,et al.  Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity , 2001 .

[4]  K. Taylor,et al.  An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project , 2003 .

[5]  S. Gorshkov,et al.  World ocean atlas , 1976 .

[6]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[7]  I. Musat,et al.  On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles , 2006 .

[8]  Richard L. Smith,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainty in Projections of Regional Climate Change: A Bayesian Approach to the Analysis of Multimodel Ensembles , 2005 .

[9]  F. Molteni,et al.  The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation , 1996 .

[10]  M. Collins,et al.  Projections of future climate change , 2002 .

[11]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  Changing spatial structure of the thermohaline circulation in response to atmospheric CO2 forcing in a climate model , 1999, Nature.

[12]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainties in Climate System Properties with the Use of Recent Climate Observations , 2002, Science.

[13]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations , 2004, Nature.

[14]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments , 2000 .

[15]  Upmanu Lall,et al.  Improved Combination of Multiple Atmospheric GCM Ensembles for Seasonal Prediction , 2004 .

[16]  T. Palmer.  A nonlinear dynamical perspective on model error: A proposal for non‐local stochastic‐dynamic parametrization in weather and climate prediction models , 2001 .

[17]  Tim N. Palmer,et al.  The economic value of ensemble forecasts as a tool for risk assessment: From days to decades , 2002 .

[18]  M. Collins,et al.  The internal climate variability of HadCM3, a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments , 2001 .

[19]  Aixue Hu,et al.  Factors Affecting Climate Sensitivity in Global Coupled Models , 2004 .

[20]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[21]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  Two Stable Equilibria of a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model , 1988 .

[22]  E. Kalnay,et al.  Ensemble Forecasting at NCEP and the Breeding Method , 1997 .

[23]  R. Betts,et al.  Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century , 2004 .

[24]  Renate Hagedorn,et al.  The rationale behind the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting — I. Basic concept , 2005 .

[25]  S. Josey,et al.  Inverse Analysis Adjustment of the SOC Air-Sea Flux Climatology Using Ocean Heat Transport Constraints , 2003 .

[26]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  Use of an upwelling-diffusion energy balance climate model to simulate and diagnose A/OGCM results , 2001 .

[27]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in changes in extreme event frequency in response to doubled CO2 using a large ensemble of GCM simulations , 2006 .

[28]  J. Murphy,et al.  Transient response of the Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere model to increasing carbon-dioxide , 1995 .

[29]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  Mechanisms Determining the Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation Response to Greenhouse Gas Forcing in a Non-Flux-Adjusted Coupled Climate Model , 2001 .

[30]  Reto Knutti,et al.  Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles , 2002, Nature.

[31]  M. Vellinga,et al.  Low-Latitude Freshwater Influence on Centennial Variability of the Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation , 2004 .

[32]  Renate Hagedorn,et al.  The rationale behind the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting-II , 2005 .

[33]  M. Allen,et al.  Constraints on climate change from a multi‐thousand member ensemble of simulations , 2005 .

[34]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  The Role of Climate Sensitivity and Ocean Heat Uptake on AOGCM Transient Temperature Response , 2002 .

[35]  Elizabeth C. Kent,et al.  Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century , 2003 .

[36]  V. Pope,et al.  The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3 , 2000 .

[37]  Matthew D. Collins,et al.  Understanding uncertainties in the response of ENSO to greenhouse warming , 2000 .

[38]  T. Wigley,et al.  Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean Warming , 2001, Science.

[39]  Carl Wunsch,et al.  Improved estimates of global ocean circulation, heat transport and mixing from hydrographic data , 2000, Nature.

[40]  J. Murphy.  Transient Response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Part III: Analysis of Global-Mean Response Using Simple Models , 1995 .

[41]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases , 2005, Nature.

[42]  R. Betts,et al.  Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , 2000, Nature.

[43]  M. Collins,et al.  El Niño- or La Niña-like climate change? , 2005 .

[44]  G. Boer,et al.  CMIP1 evaluation and intercomparison of coupled climate models , 2001 .