Spheromak Formation by Steady Inductive Helicity Injection

A spheromak is formed for the first time using a new steady state inductive helicity injection method. Using two inductive injectors with odd symmetry and oscillating at 5.8 kHz, a steady state spheromak with even symmetry is formed and sustained through nonlinear relaxation. A spheromak with about 13 kA of toroidal current is formed and sustained using about 3 MW of power. This is a much lower power threshold for spheromak production than required for electrode-based helicity injection. Internal magnetic probe data, including oscillations driven by the injectors, agree with the plasma being in the Taylor state. The agreement is remarkable considering the only fitting parameter is the amplitude of the spheromak component of the state.

[1]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Non-inductive current generation in NSTX using coaxial helicity injection , 2001 .

[2]  Juan C Fernández,et al.  Progress with energy confinement time in the CTX spheromak , 1990 .

[3]  Thomas R. Jarboe,et al.  Review of spheromak research , 1994 .

[4]  M. G. Rusbridge,et al.  Structure of the n = 1 mode responsible for relaxation and current drive during sustainment of the SPHEX spheromak , 1997 .

[5]  R. L. Hagenson,et al.  Steady-State Spheromak Reactor Studies , 1985 .

[6]  M. Rosenbluth,et al.  MHD stability of Spheromak , 1979 .

[7]  Wysocki,et al.  Improved energy confinement in spheromaks with reduced field errors. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[8]  Wysocki,et al.  Evidence for a pressure-driven instability in the CTX spheromak. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[9]  M. Nagata,et al.  The internal magnetic field structures and current density profiles in the Helicity Injected Spherical Torus plasma driven by coaxial helicity injection , 2003 .

[10]  L. Woltjer,et al.  A THEOREM ON FORCE-FREE MAGNETIC FIELDS. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  B. Alper,et al.  A model for the loop voltage of reversed field pinches , 1987 .

[12]  J B Taylor,et al.  Relaxation and magnetic reconnection in plasmas , 1986 .

[13]  T. Jarboe.  Steady inductive helicity injection and its application to a high-beta spheromak , 1999 .

[14]  U. Shumlak,et al.  Stable high beta spheromak equilibria using concave flux conservers , 2000 .

[15]  D. N. Hill,et al.  Suppression of MHD fluctuations leading to improved confinement in a gun-driven spheromak. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[16]  Thomas R. Jarboe,et al.  Formation and sustainment of a low‐aspect ratio tokamak by coaxial helicity injection , 1995 .

[17]  D. N. Hill,et al.  Improved operation of the SSPX spheromak , 2005 .

[18]  Thomas R. Jarboe,et al.  The impedance and energy efficiency of a coaxial magnetized plasma source used for spheromak formation and sustainment , 1990 .

[19]  C. Barnes,et al.  Slow formation and sustainment of spheromaks by a coaxial magnetized plasma source , 1983 .

[20]  Cunningham,et al.  Observations of the magnetohydrodynamic dynamo effect in a spheromak plasma. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[21]  Juan C Fernández,et al.  The m=1 helicity source spheromak experiment , 1989 .

[22]  Thomas R. Jarboe,et al.  Demonstration of steady inductive helicity injection , 2006 .

[23]  A. Mattick,et al.  Results from current drive experiments on the Helicity Injected Torus , 1998 .

[24]  C. Barnes,et al.  Experimental determination of the conservation of magnetic helicity from the balance between source and spheromak , 1986 .

[25]  W. T. Hamp,et al.  Initial studies of steady inductive helicity injection on the HIT-SI experiment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[26]  M. Landreman,et al.  Experimental Observation of Energetic Ions Accelerated by Three-dimensional Magnetic Reconnection in a Laboratory Plasma , 2002 .

[27]  K. Gibson,et al.  Current amplification in SPHEX operated as a spherical tokamak , 2000 .