How to Design Rating Schemes of Risk Matrices: A Sequential Updating Approach

Risk matrices have been widely used as a risk evaluation tool in many fields due to their simplicity and intuitive nature. Designing a rating scheme, i.e., determining the number of ratings used in a risk matrix and assigning different ratings to different cells, is an essential part of risk matrix construction. However, most of the related literature has focused on applying a risk matrix to various fields, instead of researching how to design risk matrices. Based on the analysis of several current rules, we propose a new approach, namely, the sequential updating approach (SUA), to design the rating scheme of a risk matrix in a reliable way. In this article, we propose three principles and a rating algorithm based on these principles. The three principles, namely, adjusted weak consistency, consistent internality, and continuous screening, characterize a good rating scheme. The resulting rating scheme has been proven to be unique. A global rating algorithm is then proposed to create the design that satisfies the three principles. We then explore the performance of the SUA. An illustrative application is first given to explain the feasibility of our approach. The sensitivity analysis shows that our method captures a resolution-reliability tradeoff for decisionmakers in choosing an appropriate rating scheme for a risk matrix. Finally, we compare the designs based on the SUA and Cox's axioms, highlighting the advantages of the SUA.

[1]  Dengsheng Wu,et al.  A fuzzy mapping framework for risk aggregation based on risk matrices , 2018 .

[2]  D. Ball,et al.  Further Thoughts on the Utility of Risk Matrices , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Caspar J. M. Hewett,et al.  Towards a nutrient export risk matrix approach to managing agricultural pollution at source , 2004 .

[4]  Eric D. Smith,et al.  Risk matrix input data biases , 2009 .

[5]  Nijs Jan Duijm,et al.  Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices , 2015 .

[6]  Sandeep Shashikant Janwadkar,et al.  Electromagnetic MWD improves drilling performance in the Fayetteville , 2010 .

[7]  Gritta Schrader,et al.  Eliciting and Combining Decision Criteria Using a Limited Palette of Utility Functions and Uncertainty Distributions: Illustrated by Application to Pest Risk Analysis , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  Michael Smithson,et al.  Never say "not": Impact of negative wording in probability phrases on imprecise probability judgments , 2012, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[9]  Jerald C. Dethlefs,et al.  Assessing Well-Integrity Risk: A Qualitative Model , 2012 .

[10]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Xing Hong Risk Matrix Analysis Using Copulas , 2012 .

[12]  Gary W. Yohe,et al.  Development of risk matrices for evaluating climatic change responses of forested habitats , 2012, Climatic Change.

[13]  Wen-Kai Hsu,et al.  Evaluating the risk of operational safety for dangerous goods in airfreights – A revised risk matrix based on fuzzy AHP , 2016 .

[14]  Tim Bedford,et al.  Decision Making for Group Risk Reduction: Dealing with Epistemic Uncertainty , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  Stephen P. Cowley,et al.  Risk Matrices: Implied accuracy and false assumptions , 2010 .

[16]  Cameron A MacKenzie,et al.  Summarizing Risk Using Risk Measures and Risk Indices , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  David Pritchard,et al.  Drilling hazard management: The value of risk assessment , 2010 .

[18]  H. Ni,et al.  Some extensions on risk matrix approach , 2010 .

[19]  E. S. Levine Improving risk matrices: the advantages of logarithmically scaled axes , 2012 .

[20]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[21]  Xin Ruan,et al.  Risk Matrix Integrating Risk Attitudes Based on Utility Theory , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  On the assessment of uncertainty in risk diagrams , 2016 .

[23]  Louis Anthony Cox,et al.  What's Wrong with Risk Matrices? , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Peter Burnap,et al.  On the origin of PCDS - (Probability consequence diagrams) , 2015 .

[25]  Philip Thomas,et al.  The Risk of Using Risk Matrices , 2013 .

[26]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  Designing and exploring risk matrices with MACBETH , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..