Understanding the role of ICT and study circles in enabling economic opportunities: Lessons learned from an educational project in Kenya

In this paper, we explore how the combination of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and self‐organised study circles improves rural communities' ability to enhance their economic opportunities. We present the case study of an adult study‐circle project in the Kwale County of Kenya with the objective of providing rural communities with viable and sustainable livelihoods. Study circles can be seen as a democratic and emancipatory method for learning, where community groups regularly meet for participatory discussions to educate themselves on a variety of topics of their own interest. The main goal of the study‐circle members was to increase economic opportunities using ICT and, more specifically, to start micro‐businesses, improve production efficacy and methods, and obtain employment. Using the capability approach and affordances as theoretical lenses, our analysis of the explorative case study shows that the outcomes of the study circle were dependent on various conversion factors and facilitating conditions, such as resources, skills, socio‐cultural norms, and infrastructure. The main contributions from our work are represented by the five practical lessons learned from the study‐circle members' goals (starting micro‐businesses, product efficiency, and obtaining employment) from the self‐organised training approach (study circles) and from our theoretical approach (combining the capability approach and affordances).

[1]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The story of socio‐technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  James Found Children's Fund , 2010 .

[3]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  New socio-technical perspectives of IS innovation in organizations , 2003 .

[4]  Wallace Chigona,et al.  Telecentres Use in Rural Communities and Women Empowerment: Case of Western Cape , 2017, ICT4D.

[5]  Richard Heeks,et al.  ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development , 2008, Computer.

[6]  Fazila Bhimji Identities and agency in religious spheres: a study of British Muslim women's experience , 2009 .

[7]  Øystein Sæbø,et al.  Building collective capabilities through ICT in a mountain region of Nepal: where social capital leads to collective action , 2012, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[8]  Nimmi Rangaswamy,et al.  The PC in an Indian urban slum: enterprise and entrepreneurship in ICT4D 2.0 , 2012, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[9]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The enactments and consequences of token, shared, and compliant participation in information systems development , 1996 .

[10]  William W. Gaver Technology affordances , 1991, CHI.

[11]  Sturla Bjerkaker Changing Communities. The Study Circle – For Learning and democracy , 2014 .

[12]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Unveiling the modernity bias: a critical examination of the politics of ICT4D , 2012, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[13]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[14]  Devinder Thapa,et al.  "What You See is Not What You Get" - Challenges in Actualization of EHR Affordances , 2017, ICIS.

[15]  Mathias Hatakka,et al.  Victim, mother, or untapped resource? : Discourse analysis of the construction of women in ICT policies , 2017 .

[16]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Context is king! Considering particularism in research design and reporting , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[18]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[19]  Devinder Thapa,et al.  Understanding ICT in ICT4D: An Affordance Perspective , 2017, HICSS.

[20]  I. Robeyns Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Human Development the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey , 2022 .

[21]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Øystein Sæbø,et al.  A holistic perspective on the theoretical foundations for ICT4D research , 2018, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[23]  Yingqin Zheng,et al.  Inequality of what? Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[24]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[25]  Karen Stendal,et al.  When Is an Affordance? Outlining Four Stances , 2016, IS&O.

[26]  M. Turshen Development as Freedom , 2001 .

[27]  S. Faraj,et al.  The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective , 2013 .

[28]  C. Aydin,et al.  Evaluating the organizational impact of healthcare information systems , 2005 .

[29]  Maung K. Sein,et al.  Trajectory of Affordances: Insights from a case of telemedicine in Nepal , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[30]  Shirin Madon,et al.  Enhancing human resource development through information and communications technology , 2006 .

[31]  Yingqin Zheng,et al.  Capabilities and Affordances in the ICT4D Context - Similarities, Differences, and Complementarities , 2019, ICT4D.

[32]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affordance, conventions, and design , 1999, INTR.

[33]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Bangladesh calling: farmers' technology use practices as a driver for development , 2011, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[34]  R. Jensen The Digital Provide: Information (Technology), Market Performance, and Welfare in the South Indian Fisheries Sector , 2007 .

[35]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[36]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Critical Realism and Affordances: Theorizing IT-Associated Organizational Change Processes , 2013, MIS Q..

[37]  Marcia Triunfol When What You See Is Not What You Get: , 2005, The Book of Job in Jewish Life and Thought.

[38]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Information and Communication Technology and the Social Inclusion of Refugees , 2016, MIS Q..

[39]  Arlene Bailey,et al.  Issues Affecting the Social Sustainability of Telecentres in Developing Contexts: A Field Study of Sixteen Telecentres in Jamaica , 2009, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[40]  Yingqin Zheng,et al.  Affordances of social media in collective action: the case of Free Lunch for Children in China , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[41]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Deriving an ICT4D research agenda: a commentary on ‘Information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D): solutions seeking problems?’ , 2012, J. Inf. Technol..

[43]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems , 2005 .

[44]  Wan Rozaini Sheik Osman,et al.  A Conceptual Model for Psychological Empowerment of Telecentre Users , 2010, Comput. Inf. Sci..

[45]  B. Stahl,et al.  Technology, capabilities and critical perspectives: what can critical theory contribute to Sen’s capability approach? , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[46]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[47]  D. Kleine “The Men Never Say that They do not Know”: Telecentres as Gendered Spaces , 2011 .