Biomass gasification cogeneration – A review of state of the art technology and near future perspectives

Abstract Biomass is a renewable resource from which a broad variety of commodities can be produced. However, the resource is scarce and must be used with care to avoid depleting future stock possibilities. Flexibility and efficiency in production are key characteristics for biomass conversion technologies in future energy systems. Thermal gasification of biomass is proved throughout this article to be both highly flexible and efficient if used optimally. Cogeneration processes with production of heat-and-power, heat-power-and-fuel or heat-power-and-fertilizer are described and compared. The following gasification platforms are included in the assessment: The Harboore up draft gasifier with gas engine, the Gussing FICFB gasifier with gas engine or PDU, the LT-CFB gasifier with steam cycle and nutrient recycling and finally the TwoStage down draft gasifier with gas engine, micro gas turbine (MGT), SOFC, SOFC/MGT or catalytic fuel synthesis.

[1]  Brian Elmegaard,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of small-scale dimethyl ether (DME) and methanol plants based on the efficien , 2011 .

[2]  Copernicus Copernicus,et al.  Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass , 2001 .

[3]  A. Cowie,et al.  Biochar and Emissions of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases from Soil , 2012 .

[4]  D. Laird,et al.  Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil , 2010 .

[5]  Jesper Ahrenfeldt,et al.  The potential of pyrolysis technology in climate change mitigation – influence of process design and –parameters, simulated in SuperPro Designer Software , 2011 .

[6]  Fuat E. Celik,et al.  Large‐scale gasification‐based coproduction of fuels and electricity from switchgrass , 2009 .

[7]  Brian Elmegaard,et al.  Technoeconomic analysis of a low CO2 emission dimethyl ether (DME) plant based on gasification of torrefied biomass , 2010 .

[8]  Stephen Joseph,et al.  Biochar for environmental management: an introduction , 2015 .

[9]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2000 .

[10]  Toshiyuki Suda,et al.  The Superior Technical Choice for Dual Fluidized Bed Gasification , 2006 .

[11]  U. Hohenwarter,et al.  High temperature electrolyte supported Ni-GDC/YSZ/LSM SOFC operation on two-stage Viking gasifier product gas , 2007 .

[12]  M. Rillig,et al.  Characteristics of Biochar: Biological Properties , 2012 .

[13]  Simon Harvey,et al.  CO2 emission balances for different black liquor gasification biorefinery concepts for production of electricity or second-generation liquid biofuels. , 2010 .

[14]  Hofbauer Hermann,et al.  Biomass CHP Plant Güssing - A Success Story , 2002 .

[15]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology , 2009 .

[16]  T. Schildhauer,et al.  Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass - A technology review from 1950 to 2009 , 2010 .

[17]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Exergetic evaluation of 5 biowastes-to-biofuels routes via gasification , 2010 .

[18]  Masoud Rokni,et al.  Thermodynamic Performance Study of Biomass Gasification, Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Micro Gas Turbine Hybrid Systems , 2010 .

[19]  Jesper Ahrenfeldt,et al.  The design, construction and operation of a 75kW two-stage gasifier , 2006 .