A comparative study of the use of zero-crossing analysis methods for vowel recognition

Earlier results have determined mathematical interrelationships between several zero-crossing analysis methods which have been applied to automatic speech recognition. In the present paper, some initial work aimed at determining the relative applicability. of these zero-crossing analysis methods for speech recognition is presented. Toward this end, two simulation studies with English vowels are described. One study is aimed at determining the relative discriminability of the methods for vowel recognition. The other study is aimed at determining the noise vulnerability of the zero-crossing analysis methods. Results of this study indicate that one of the zero-crossing methods appears to have the potential for more accurate vowel recognition than the others.

[1]  Russell J. Niederjohn,et al.  A Computer Interface for Efficient Zero-Crossing Interval Measurement , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[2]  E. Peterson Frequency Detection and Speech Formants , 1951 .

[3]  T. Gasser,et al.  Numerical analysis of electroencephalographic data , 1970 .

[4]  K. Davis,et al.  Automatic Recognition of Spoken Digits , 1952 .

[5]  W. Bezdel,et al.  Results of an analysis and recognition of vowels by computer using zero-crossing data , 1965 .

[6]  D. Reddy Segmentation of Speech Sounds , 1966 .

[7]  Ian B. Thomas,et al.  The Influence of First and Second Formants on the Intelligibility of Clipped Speech , 1968 .

[8]  J. Taylor,et al.  Computer recognition of speech using zero-crossing information , 1969 .

[9]  Harry Press,et al.  Some Applications of Generalized Harmonic Analysis to Gust Loads on Airplanes , 1955 .

[10]  N. Burch,et al.  Period analytic estimates of moments of the power spectrum: a simplified EEG time domain procedure. , 1971, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  N R BURCH,et al.  PERIOD ANALYSIS OF THE ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM ON A GENERAL‐PURPOSE DIGITAL COMPUTER * , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. Niederjohn A mathematical formulation and comparison of zero-crossing analysis techniques which have been applied to automatioc speech recognition , 1975 .

[13]  I. Pollack,et al.  Effects of Differentiation, Integration, and Infinite Peak Clipping upon the Intelligibility of Speech , 1948 .

[14]  R. Niederjohn,et al.  Computer recognition of the continuant phonemes in connected english speech , 1973 .

[15]  D. Reddy Computer recognition of connected speech. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J. S. Bridle,et al.  Speech recognition using zero-crossing measurements and sequence information , 1969 .

[17]  Shuji Doshita,et al.  The Automatic Speech Recognition System for Conversational Sound , 1963, IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput..

[18]  W. A. Munson,et al.  A Speech Analyzer and Synthesizer , 1950 .

[19]  Sze-Hou Chang,et al.  Representations of Speech Sounds and Some of Their Statistical Properties , 1951, Proceedings of the IRE.